Hey @netflix you wouldn't happen to be launching a propaganda operation about WikiLeaks three days before Julian Assange's court date on October 27th, would you?
I ask because it really seems like you are launching a propaganda operation about WikiLeaks three days before Julian Assange's court date on October 27th.
wsws.org/en/articles/20… Image
I mean I guess maybe it could be a coincidence that you @netflix are launching a 130-minute smear job on Julian Assange three days before a crucial court date for Julian Assange. That's why I thought I'd ask.
Because I think if I wanted to launch a propaganda operation about Julian Assange three days before his court date on October 27th, I'd probably choose one so aggressively hostile that WikiLeaks had to publish a shot-by-shot refutation of it in 2013:
wikileaks.org/IMG/html/gibne… Image
The advantage to using that 2013 film to advance a smear campaign against Julian Assange ahead of a crucial court date would be that it works: it changes people's opinion of Assange and makes them despise him.
That is to say, it would be an advantage if your intention is to hurt public opinion of Julian Assange in the nation whose government is trying to extradite him immediately prior to a crucial date in that very extradition trial. But surely that is not your intention, @netflix?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

16 Oct
It Takes A Lot Of Education To Keep Us This Stupid

"The fact that the propagandists have to work so hard to keep our society this insane means the natural gravitational pull is toward sanity."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/it-takes-a-l…
It Takes A Lot Of Education To Keep Us This Stupid (Audio)

"You think you're struggling? You should see the people trying to manufacture consent for a status quo that is both plainly insane and self-evidently unsustainable."
soundcloud.com/going_rogue/it…
The oligarchic empire is working harder and harder to bolt down our minds in service of its agendas.

Silicon Valley is working more and more openly in conjunction with the US government,
caitlinjohnstone.com/2021/07/16/bid…
Read 19 tweets
15 Oct
One time I tweeted that anarchism sounds good in theory but in practice it just means regurgitating foreign policy talking points from the US State Department, and the thread quickly filled up with anarchists regurgitating State Department lines about Russia, China and Syria.
Read 5 tweets
14 Oct
In the escalations between the US and China, one is the aggressor and the other is acting defensively. You can tell which is which by asking yourself how the other would react if the situation was reversed. If China started doing this to the US there would be war instantaneously. Image
"That military presence is to protect China's neighbors from Chinese aggression."

Look up all USA's murderous interventions in Central and South America. China would be far MORE justified setting up a military presence to protect nations like Cuba and Venezuela. Yet it doesn't.
This means between the US power alliance and China, Washington is the aggressor and Beijing is acting defensively. The reason western news media do not report on these escalations in this way is because western news media is propaganda.
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
How it started How it's going
This tweet had nearly 26k shares. He said there was going to be a "final solution" in which a third of Uyghurs are exterminated and the rest enslaved and exploited.
This is what he claimed would be done with those who weren't exterminated:
Read 5 tweets
13 Oct
The financial elite hate crypto not because crypto itself poses a threat to their empire, but its existence is destroying trust/belief in the "realness" narrative of money among regular people. Bitcoin is imaginary, but it's worth real money. Why? Because money is also imaginary.
The complexity of the markets is absolutely essential in controlling the narrative around why a few live like kings while the rest work like slaves just to keep a roof over their heads. You, regular person, are not meant to understand it. Because if you did it could not continue.
If you define crypto as shares it makes it clear that shares don't need to be based in any kind of physical reality in order to create "value" in a market-based system. Crypto as currency makes it clear that currency doesn't need the trade of a national economy to back it.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(