It Takes A Lot Of Education To Keep Us This Stupid
"The fact that the propagandists have to work so hard to keep our society this insane means the natural gravitational pull is toward sanity." caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/it-takes-a-l…
It Takes A Lot Of Education To Keep Us This Stupid (Audio)
"You think you're struggling? You should see the people trying to manufacture consent for a status quo that is both plainly insane and self-evidently unsustainable." soundcloud.com/going_rogue/it…
The oligarchic empire is working harder and harder to bolt down our minds in service of its agendas.
The mass media have become so blatantly propagandistic that US intelligence operatives are now openly employed by news outlets they used to have to infiltrate covertly. caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-cia-used…
NATO and military institutions are studying and testing new forms of mass-scale psychological manipulation to advance the still developing science of propaganda. caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-science-…
A transparently fake "whistleblower" is being promoted by the US political/media class to manufacture support for more internet censorship and shore up monopolistic control for institutions like Facebook who are willing to enforce it. greenwald.substack.com/p/democrats-an…
The powerful work so hard at such endeavors because they understand something that most ordinary people do not: whoever controls the dominant narratives about the world controls the world itself.
Power is controlling what happens; absolute power is controlling what people think about what happens.
This status quo of exploitation, ecocide, oppression and war benefits our rulers immensely, bringing them more wealth and power than the kings of old could ever dream of.
And they're only getting more and more aggressive about it. More and more forceful, less and less sly and subtle in their campaign to control the thoughts that are in our heads.
Many who have this realization see it as cause for despair. I personally see it as cause for hope.
They work so hard to manufacture our consent for the status quo because they absolutely require that consent; history shows us that rulers do not fare well after a critical mass of the population has turned against them.
And they're working harder and harder to manufacture that consent, even as extremely influential people begin questioning whether we're being deliberately deceived about everything.
They used to look like someone using a bucket to bail out water from a leaky boat. Now they look like someone treading water, barely managing to get their mouth and nose high enough to take gasps of air.
They're working harder and harder because they need to.
You think you're struggling? You should see the people trying to manufacture consent for a status quo that is both plainly insane and self-evidently unsustainable. They're the ones doing all the heavy lifting in this struggle. They're the ones fighting gravity.
Hope is not a popular position to take in a world that is being abused, exploited and being driven mad by manipulative sociopaths. Which is understandable.
But I just can't help it.
I look how hard they are struggling to keep the light from bursting in and driving out the darkness, and I can't help but think, "Those poor bastards can't keep that up much longer."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To be absolutely clear, the US government has appointed itself the authority to unilaterally decide which of the world's populations get to eat and which do not, and to imprison anyone who tries to facilitate unauthorized eating in a US-sanctioned nation.
The US has extradited Venezuela diplomat Alex Saab, beneath all the legal jargon for no other reason than trying to get food past US economic blockades. This May article has more info on Saab's case: mintpressnews.com/alex-saab-v-th…
This is the empire's ultimate goal: to have the world so bent to its will that war becomes unnecessary, since you can just cut off any disobedient population from the world economy. Then the media you own and control will report that that population's leader is starving them.
A question I am trying to make a habit of asking myself is "what healing can I pass on?" In my experience, so much damage can continue long after the person who is doing the damage has dropped their weapon simply because they didn't admit they were wrong to those they wronged.
I'll give you an example. A father brings his son up to believe being gay is a sin. The son hides his homosexuality from his dad. But the dad dropped that notion years ago he just never wanted to admit he was wrong. The son's shame builds to a point where he kills himself.
What haven't cleaned up on? Is there something you believed in the past that could be holding someone you love hostage still now? We are all learning and changing your mind is healthy, but it is important to hit all the way through and pass on that health to those you affected.
One time I tweeted that anarchism sounds good in theory but in practice it just means regurgitating foreign policy talking points from the US State Department, and the thread quickly filled up with anarchists regurgitating State Department lines about Russia, China and Syria.
In the escalations between the US and China, one is the aggressor and the other is acting defensively. You can tell which is which by asking yourself how the other would react if the situation was reversed. If China started doing this to the US there would be war instantaneously.
"That military presence is to protect China's neighbors from Chinese aggression."
Look up all USA's murderous interventions in Central and South America. China would be far MORE justified setting up a military presence to protect nations like Cuba and Venezuela. Yet it doesn't.
This means between the US power alliance and China, Washington is the aggressor and Beijing is acting defensively. The reason western news media do not report on these escalations in this way is because western news media is propaganda.
Hey @netflix you wouldn't happen to be launching a propaganda operation about WikiLeaks three days before Julian Assange's court date on October 27th, would you?
I ask because it really seems like you are launching a propaganda operation about WikiLeaks three days before Julian Assange's court date on October 27th. wsws.org/en/articles/20…
I mean I guess maybe it could be a coincidence that you @netflix are launching a 130-minute smear job on Julian Assange three days before a crucial court date for Julian Assange. That's why I thought I'd ask.