Interesting article in QS where Xi explains reasons behind the "common prosperity" drive: 1. Taking the promotion of common prosperity for all people as the focus of seeking happiness for the people, and constantly consolidating the foundation of the party’s long-term governance;
2. High-quality development requires high-quality workers. Only by promoting common prosperity, increasing the income of urban and rural residents, and enhancing human capital, can we increase total factor productivity and consolidate the foundation for high-quality development.
3. The problem of global income inequality is prominent. Some countries are divided between the rich and the poor, ...leading to social tearing, political polarization & populism. China must resolutely prevent polarization, & achieve social harmony & stability.
so how to achieve this? Xi laid down the following principles: 1. everyone has to take part in, avoiding "involution" and "laying flat".
2. Adhere to the basic economic system. Public ownership is the mainstay & plays important role in promoting common prosperity, at the same time promote the healthy development of the non-public economy and the healthy growth of people from the non-public economy.
"healthy"...
3. Don't try to raise your appetite & make promises that cannot be fulfilled. The government can't pay everything. Don't fall into the trap of "welfare states" and raise lazy people.
4. "Common prosperity" can't be achieved overnight. It will be with us for a long time.
& now some practical advice: 1. "Coordinated development of finance and real estate with the real economy". So the days of big profits for big banks and developers are over?
2. "Attract more high-quality talents to join the team of skilled workers". Good news for college graduates!
3. "Adhere to the positioning that the house is used for living, not for speculation, rent and purchase at the same time, implement policies in accordance with the city, and improve the long-term rental policy".
More bad news for the developers?
4. "Strengthen the regulation and adjustment of high income".
How? income tax, capital tax, property tax, consumption tax.
So what exactly constitutes "excessively high income"? I tweeted this 2 months ago:
& this part is so loaded:
"We have a complete solution to the problem of poverty, but we still need to explore and accumulate experience on how to get rich. It is necessary to protect property rights and intellectual property rights, and protect legal wealth".
"We must resolutely oppose the disorderly expansion of capital, draw a negative list for access to sensitive areas, strengthen anti-monopoly supervision. At the same time, we must mobilize enthusiasm of entrepreneurs to promote the healthy development of various types of capital"
5. "Promote the common prosperity of the people's spiritual life", in line with the drive for “online civilization" that I discussed in @china_neican earlier this month. neican.org/p/civilizing-c…
6. "Accelerate the industrialization of agriculture" and "revitalize rural assets", which is coded language for lifting the restrictions on sale of rural land.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hugely important decision from @EU_Commission, which used the role of CCP members in company management and decision to infer state interference on prices and costs, which led to the rejection of Chinese prices as the basis for normal value determination in anti-dumping cases.
In response, Xiamen Xiashun, one of the companies under investigation, argues that CCP membership is nothing more than joining "a religion or political party of its choice and it has no bearing on the decision making in the company".
Personally, I find the reasoning of @EU_Commission a bit weak. Instead, I'd suggest @EU_Commission use this direct quote from Board Chairman of the company, as reported in 2015:
"Party organization & party members have played a vital role in ensuring our impressive performance."
China's Deputy Permanent Representative to the @UN: “Rule-based international order” is a violation of the spirit of the rule of law. newsus.cgtn.com/news/2021-10-1…
"there is only one international system, i.e. the international system with the United Nations at its core. There is only one international order, i.e. the international order underpinned by international law."
"And there is only one set of rules, i.e. the basic norms governing international relations underpinned by the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter"
1. a man and two women:
Remember this guy? The former CEO of Taobao and heir apparent to Jack Ma. He got into a high-profile scandal last year when he was allegedly involved in an extra-marital affair, then Alibaba rushed to removed all posts from social media.
This is how the scandal made its way into a high-level report to the top leadership, where the CAC called it an example of "capital manipulating media". Since then, Alibaba has been ordered to divest its huge media empire, as reported by @WSJ in March. wsj.com/articles/beiji…
1. The 2021 list is a very broad ban on everything relating to the news media sector, while the 2020 list does allow non-public capital participation, subject to equity caps.
2. While many of the items banned in 2020 remain banned in 2021, there have been many important additions on the 2021 list, including banning non-public capital from engaging in news reporting & editing, public account, importing foreign news, holding news summits or prize awards
China just published its Statements at the DSB Meeting on 27 September 2021. most interesting is the part on the US-Solar Safeguards case, where China noted the following: 1. the panel lowered the legal standards for safeguard measures, esp on the causation analysis;
2. the panel failed to conduct an objective assessment of the matter by deferring to ITC's findings, esp on "unforeseen development" analysis re China's industrial policies.
3. the panel did not follow the proper standard of review by allowing post hoc rationalization by the US.