“Since our built environment is itself a condition of successfully ordered human action, the construction of this environment has immense ethical significance. Christopher Alexander’s architectural theory is remarkably consonant with this picture…”
Alexander’s pattern language as an Aristotelian exploration of the material conditions for the common good; e.g., “Light on Two Sides of Every Room” allows people to understand each other.
I’ve been thinking about this in terms of the mind’s embodiedness making architecture a central concern for thinking itself. Bachelard’s “Poetics of Space” views the home as the structure that protects daydreaming. Thinking takes space, it happens somewhere, it’s embedded.
hmm, it’s not that a self is everything in a holistic sense, but a self is an “index” for everything
the Proustian smell of a childhood cookie is an example: the smell activates a certain self (or “selfoid”) which then launches a mood and outlook that encompasses the whole lifeworld
selves are like perspectives, like cameras with idiosyncratic filters and focusing tendencies, like origins that the world is organized around
@AskYatharth I wonder if “God” is a way of non-doing with larger scale intentions. Like, letting Jesus take the wheel. You don’t just trust your gut intuition, but attune to the wisdom of the universal conscience.
@AskYatharth In general I’m very curious how people manage to bring larger scale motivation, perception, direction into the present moment of non-coercive unfolding.
@AskYatharth Institutions are one way, I suppose: the social architecture aligns your daily actions with institutional frames. But that doesn’t seem sufficient.