Did you see all the recent developments in #climatelitigation in @SabinCenter's global database? In case you missed them, here is a summary of what happened in the past 2 weeks:
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Lots of new cases in Germany:
First, two cases targeting auto companies.
The first one is against BMW:
πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3vjbiUu
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ The second one, against Mercedes-Benz:
πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/30l4iL8
I wrote a more detailed post about them and what that means in the broader scheme of global #climatelitigation:
πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3p4mPWm
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Then a series of cases brought against state governments in Germany for the failure to adopt a climate law or the inadequacy for an existing climate law:
@Umwelthilfe vs state of Nordrhein-Westfalen (inadequacy)

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3FSOKyq
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Also against the state of Nordrhein-Westfalen, a claim brought by youth plaintiffs:

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3p9Ygr8
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ A youth claim against the state of Hesse (inadequacy of a bill under debate):

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3lHtROU
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ A youth claim against the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (lack of a climate law):

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3n0NReP
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ A youth claim against the state of Saarland (lack of a climate law):

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3BONHNU
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ A youth claim against the state of Sachsen (lack of a climate law):

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3lJRIxx
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ A youth claim against the state of Sachsen-Anhalt (lack of a climate law):

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3FSgu6D
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ A youth claim against the state of Brandenburg (lack of a climate law):

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3p9ZUsO
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ And three cases against the state of Bayern:

A constitutional claim:
πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/2XgmkNv
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ A subsidiary claim against the state of Bayern:

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3lGeiXI
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ And a final claim brought by @Umwelthilfe against the state of Bayern:

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3veuoen
πŸ‡«πŸ‡· A big decision in the #AffaireDuSiecle case calling on the government to comply with its emission reduction targets and repair the damages of its inaction: @NotreAffaire

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3AKDXTe
And finally, a decision by the @UNChildRights1 on the children's climate case determining the extraterritorial responsibilities of states related to carbon pollution (despite dismissing the case for lack of admissibility):

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3AKnu1z
I wrote a more detailed note about the CRC's decision:

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/2YTsgwd
@threadreaderapp unroll, please.

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Maria Antonia Tigre

Maria Antonia Tigre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @toniatigre

1 Oct
Did you follow all of the new cases added to the @SabinCenter climate litigation database? Check this thread to see if you missed any development in global #climatelitigation? 🧡
Starting with the cases recently added to our database:

An ICSID tribunal found Colombia πŸ‡¨πŸ‡΄ breached an FTA due to its protection of the pΓ‘ramos ecosystem - essential in carbon sequestration.

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3B17bOA
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Brazilian court in Rio Grande do Sul finds that thermal power stations are required to assess potential climate damage in EIAs.

πŸ‘‰ bit.ly/3zTmYxI
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(