1/ consider 4 right-wing powers:
- building a successful organization for your family and your tribe
- getting rich, passing that on
- leading people
- teaching & raising the next generation
those have been deeply undermined through progressive legislation and cultural artifacts
2/ in particular legislation that mandates you have to include blue-tribe people in your organization
- you can't simply pick anybody.
and the blue-tribe members get gov aid in dismantling (suing) your organization according to their own sensibilities (tilted playing field).
3/ you can't amass money for your own family & tribe, the gov redistributes it to *competing* others.
4/ you can't personally take charge & lead; instead it must be done in accordance with wishes of committees of media editors
5/ and you literally aren't allowed to teach and raise the next generation yourself, you must do it through schools. limited both by legislation and by two-working-parents societal setup.
certain heroic individuals manage to do it tho.
6/ certain exceptions have been granted to those limitations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ we were told of dystopian future "corporations will oppress you in myriad ways". we were baited into giving governments extraordinary powers over corporations
every single thing came to pass - and it's the governments & their NGOs doing it. le pikachu shock face. and no neons
1/ in which @MrPrudentialist documents a particularly nasty example of
the progs baiting a new civil war
2/ the title: 100%
the progs won't stop until you follow their ever-changing rules to the T.
a good point about *language manipulation*, and dripping contempt
worth noting how calls for unity by the ruling elite are calls to *obey*.
3/ let's disagree a bit why my esteemed colleague:
>there's been a growing sentiments
>for some kind of national separation
with the blue tribe having a death grip on the comms and on the narrative-making, i surmise the sentiment is being *pumped* rather than grown organically.
2/ >In the three years I’ve spent at Facebook, I’ve found multiple blatant attempts by foreign national governments to abuse our platform on vast scales to mislead their own citizenry,
maybe don't ask a gov to get even more power over FB then?
3/ >That power contrasted with what she said seemed to be a lack of desire from senior leadership to protect democratic processes in smaller countries
somehow i trust the governments even less with this shit. and journalists *even* less than that.
1/ the "facebook whistleblower" is an op to push for more censorship. her today's testimony is for pushing more censorship to stem - get this - the danger of "political polarization" and "stoking division". manufacturing consent much?
2/ even worse, the "harming kids" narrative is based on an online poll (!). apparently 15% teens responded FB makes their lives worse, 34% that it makes their lives *better*, and 51% didn't lean either way.
this is how a "whistleblower" made it to congressional hearing lol
3/ the unsaid part is that FB is killing the old style media, and their narrative-making capability.
the other unsaid part is journalists were told to stop being little hall monitors.