Almost everyone has at least heard of the Huns, Goths, Vandals, Franks, and Saxons, and of their legendary leaders like Attila, Clovis, and Hengist and Horsa. However, few know anything about Odoacer, the general turned king who actually ended the Western Roman Empire. A thread:
It's not clear what, exactly, Odoacer was, although he certainly wasn't considered Roman. Classical sources variously call him a Hun or a member of various east Germanic tribes that had just broken out of Attila's collapsing empire.
The earliest supposed mention of Odoacer is from the Life of St Severinus. The future king, then a young man, met the holy ascetic while traveling through the Alps to Italy, who told him, "Go to Italy, go, now covered with mean hides; soon you will make rich gifts to many."
By 470 AD, he was a senior officer in the Italian field army of the Western Roman Empire. By this point, the Western Empire was mostly just Italy and Dalmatia along the Adriatic coast; everywhere else had been broken off by Germanic invaders and rebellious generals.
At the time, the Empire was dominated by the Burgundian general Ricimer. He served under the Emperor Majorian, but assassinated him in 461 and placed a puppet senator, Libius Severius, on the throne, because as a non-Roman he could not take power himself.
(For more on the assassination of Majorian and its consequences throughout the empire, see this thread: )
When Libius Severius died in 465, the East stepped in to impose order on what they saw as a failed state. The Eastern Emperor Leo sent a general, Anthemius, to Italy with an army to make himself emperor. Ricimer was cowed by his military might and reluctantly swore allegiance.
The strategic priority for the Empire was clear: retake North Africa. It was the breadbasket of the west - its grain fed Rome and its taxes paid its armies. Unfortunately, it had been seized by the Vandals in 439, who used it as a base for raiding throughout the Mediterranean.
Majorian had tried to retake North Africa and failed. Anthemius could not - his expedition represented the last gasp of the Western Empire. Backed by Eastern money and men, he set sail with 1,000 ships and 30,000 soldiers in 468 and attempted to land at Cape Bon, near Carthage.
However, the Vandals launched a surprise attack with fire ships, destroying much of the Roman fleet and defeating the expedition. Anthemius continued to try to rebuild the Empire, but this was hopeless - he was bankrupt, his army was gone, and he had lost the backing of the East.
At this point Ricimer resumed his old games and Odoacer steps firmly into the historical record. Ricimer had never had a good relationship with the Emperor; the Bishop of Pavia tried to broker a true between them but failed. In 472 it descended into open warfare between them.
Anthemius was backed by the aristocracy and people of Rome itself; Ricimer, by the Italian army, with Odoacer as one of his senior officers. After five months of urban combat in Rome, Anthemius was cornered in his last stronghold, starved out, and executed.
Ricimer put another puppet on the throne, Olybrius, but died only six weeks after his rival. This left a power vacuum with numerous generals and aristocrats itching to fill it. Olybrius died right afterward; he was followed by another weak Emperor, Glycerius.
In 474, Julius Nepos, commander of Roman forces in Dalmatia, took his army into Italy, deposed Glycerius, and became emperor himself, all with the backing of the East. He ruled for a year, defeating a Visigothic invasion of Italy and trying to reassert Imperial authority in Gaul.
However, Odoacer, now commander of his Germanic Foederati, and Orestes, one of his generals, schemed against him. In 475, they staged a coup. Nepos fled back to Dalmatia and the plotters put Orestes' young son, Romulus Augustulus, on the throne.
Orestes' power ultimately relied on his mostly Germanic army, who above all wanted land in Italy to settle on. When Orestes refused to give it to them, Odoacer led them in a revolt in 476, killing Orestes in battle and deposing and exiling the young emperor to a villa.
What Odoacer did was entirely unexceptional, except perhaps for the mercy he showed Romulus. What was new was what he did afterwards - he informed the Eastern Emperor that there was no need for two emperors; Odoacer would simply govern Italy under his authority as Patrician.
To his soldiers and the people of Italy, however, he declared himself "Rex Italiae" - King of Italy. His rule was surprisingly successful and even Roman. He maintained the support of the senate throughout, giving them more authority than they enjoyed under the emperors.
He forced the Vandals to cede Sicily to him and his armies retook Dalmatia and Raetia. Pope Felix III had no conflict with Odoacer, despite his Arianism and that of his soldiers. His 17 year reign was the longest period of stability anyone alive in Italy at the time had known.
However, Odoacer could not ultimately escape the fate of his predecessors. His growing power and independence became a threat to the Eastern Emperor Zeno, who sent a rebellious Ostrogothic general, Theodoric, to depose him and rule Italy in his stead.
Theodoric invaded Italy in 489 and, after a series of back and forth battles, defeated Odoacer and besieged him in Ravenna in 490. After a three year siege, the Bishop of Ravenna brokered a peace deal under which the two men would rule Italy together.
Ten days later, they held a banquet to celebrate the treaty. Seated next to his elderly rival, Theodoric drew his sword without warning and killed him, yelling, "This is what you did to my friends!" His followers descended on Odoacer's family and supporters.
Odoacer destroyed the Roman empire, but in a sense he preserved it. He had accomplished what none of the emperors he served under could - consolidating the territories under his rule and bringing over a decade of peace and stability to people under him.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stilicho

Stilicho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StilichoReads

17 Oct
Gallo-Roman bishop Sidonius Apollinaris wrote a letter to his uncle describing his meeting with the Visigothic King Theodoric II, sometime in the 450s. Sidonius describes him as a temperate and Christian ruler, giving a picture of the life of a Post-Roman Germanic king. A thread: Image
Before daybreak, the king prayed with a small group of priests, before devoting his mornings to the administration of his kingdom and meetings with foreign diplomats. Image
He hunted for pleasure, a servant carrying his bow for him. Theodoric was such an expert archer that he would ask his companions what to shoot, never missing the target they selected. Image
Read 6 tweets
17 Oct
One Roman legion was founded by Augustus and is last attested fighting against the Islamic conquest of Egypt. It had the longest known service history of any Roman legion - 680 years. Its history is that of the empire itself. A thread on Legio V Macedonia:
Legio V was one of the original 28 legions raised by Octavian in 43 BC. It almost certainly fought at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC against Marc Anthony before being transferred to Macedonia in 30 BC, where it acquired it's nickname. It would remain in the province until 6 AD.
In 62 AD, some detachments were sent to Armenia to fight the Parthians. Traditionally a Roman client, the Parthians had managed to put their own man in the throne. Legio V was part of the army sent to remove him. Although Rome suffered some defeats, they did so in the end.
Read 16 tweets
8 Oct
Were the armies of the Germanic kingdoms of Post-Roman Europe essentially Roman, the descendants of Late Roman field armies; essentially Germanic, the descendants of tribal warbands; or something in between? A thread:
It's clear that all of them were based around the retinues of powerful individuals, whether kings, lesser noblemen, or even bishops. However, the political and social role of such men was more complex than might be imagined, acting variously as royal officials or elite soldiers.
The 6th century Frankish Salic Law describes two types of royal retainers: the higher ranking antrustiones and the pueri regis - literally "royal boys." The antrustiones, at least, were a legally distinct category, with a higher weregild than ordinary citizens.
Read 19 tweets
4 Oct
I wanted to do a thread on the complex relationship between civil wars and barbarian invasions in the last decades of the Western Roman Empire. I decided to illustrate this through the life of one man: Aegidius, a Roman general who made himself an independent ruler:
Aegidius began as a loyal supporter of Majorian, one of the last capable western emperors, who took power in 457. The two men had served together in the army, and Aegidius was made Magister Militum per Gallias - commander of Roman forces in Gaul.
They had their work cut out for them. By this point, Rome had lost control of much of its territory to semi-independent barbarian kingdoms, including the critical breadbasket of North Africa. They had to force these rulers to submit to imperial authority.
Read 17 tweets
1 Oct
One of the commonly given causes of the fall of the Western Roman Empire is the barbarianization of its army - the army was increasingly made up of foreign Germanic tribesmen, with a corresponding decrease in loyalty and effectiveness. Was this true? A thread:
It isn't really in doubt that the Roman Army was increasingly made up of ethnic Germans, both recruited individually into professional field army units and incorporated as whole tribes of Foedreti. Still, the majority of soldiers were probably born within the empire.
An analysis of soldiers mentioned in sources found that 52% were born in Gaul and Illyricum, and only about 25% were born outside the empire's borders. However, they appear to have been more numerous in the most elite units, and this was still an increase over the early empire.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(