Paul Poast Profile picture
Oct 16, 2021 39 tweets 12 min read Read on X
Global supply chains are a mess.

What to do? World War I offers a lesson.

[THREAD] ImageImage
This @latimes piece offers a great primer on the current delays in the global supply chain. #COVID19 is partially to blame, but supply chains were a mess before the pandemic.
latimes.com/business/story…
A key culprit is that many supply chains were set up for a "just in time" supply model coupled with "on demand" delivery expectations. So no "wiggle room".

Another cause is a lack of information sharing by the ports -- distributors can't know that there is a problem until it's too late. This is a long standing issue (consider that this tweet on the issue was from 2018)
And then there is simply a shortage of workers: from unloading at docks to driving trucks.
msnbc.com/the-11th-hour/…
All these issues were present before #COVID19. But the pandemic exacerbated them due to changes in consumption behavior and disruptions in production/distribution (read: shutdowns).
clevelandfed.org/en/newsroom-an…
When I see the above list of supply issues, I immediately think, "hmmm...we've seen something like this before."🤔
Not "we" specifically (it was 100 years ago), but the global economy: World War I and the market for foodstuffs (and coal and raw materials) ImageImage
By early 1915, it was clear that the war was resource intensive. The European allies -- 🇫🇷🇬🇧🇮🇹 -- were going to need a host of resources: munitions, raw materials, and food. LOTS of food.

And "food" mostly meant wheat, which was important for soldiers & civilians. Image
This was captured in various government propaganda posters ImageImageImage
Though they were "allies", each government wanted to make sure they fed their *own* soldiers and own civilians.

Each ally was scared of bread lines in THEIR OWN country!

Talk about a cooperation problem! Image
So each ally was competing with the other to secure wheat. And the best source to buy wheat? 🇺🇸 Image
But problems immediately arose.

First, they were all bidding against one another. You can imagine what that was doing to the price of wheat.

The below figure shows what the price of wheat did on the Chicago Board of Trade over the course of the war (data from @stlouisfed) Image
Second, even after a government secured the wheat, it had to ship it to Europe. There simply weren't enough ships.. Image
...and the ships that were available were subject to being sunk by German U-boats. Image
This resulted in freight costs shooting through the roof! Image
Addressing this problem required coordination and information sharing, big time!
The allies had created "coordinating bodies" early in the war, such as the Commission Internationale de Ravitaillement (in August 1914). Image
But this was just a talk shop, and the allies had no obligations regarding what was said or done.

Each ally would simply INFORM the others: "hey, we're purchasing wheat in Chicago, okay? Good!"
By and large, this arrangement was okay for 🇬🇧 (it had the most ships and money).

But 🇫🇷 was feeling more pressure to do something (maybe because the fighting was on their soil)

Along came Etienne Clementel, who became French Minister of Commerce in December 1915. Image
He, his "right hand man" Jean Monnet (yes, THAT Jean Monnet -- 🇪🇺), & Monnet's British counterpart, Arthur Salter, worked to find a "better" solution. ImageImage
As Monnet wrote in his memoir...
amazon.com/Memoirs-Jean-M…
...the existing system was a mess:

"For a whole year this divided purchasing system had been operating in a spirit of competition that encouraged international speculation. To put an end to this situation had become vital."
The solution? A strong International Organization!
As Monnet wrote:

"To use the opportunity to try out a new method of co-operation had become possible. I persuaded Clementel that with so good an opportunity he should play for high stakes. The British wanted rapid results: we wanted a lasting organization"
And Monnet & Salter thought that the wheat shortage emergencies made it the perfect "test case":

"Salter and I thought that the first test case for Allied co-operation should be wheat, where there had already been a very unsatisfactory attempt at joint organization"
But Salter had to convince his superior, Walter Runciman (a cabinet member and President of the British Board of Trade), that the time was now to try a new approach. Image
Fortunately, Runciman was already hearing the same message directly from Clementel (as shown in this letter from the Runciman archives). Image
So Allied officials met in late November 1916 to negotiate and sign the "Wheat Executive" agreement. Image
The Wheat Executive was an organization based in London with three 1 British, 1 French, 1 Italian.

Critically, the executive had “full authority to meet Allied needs regarding the purchase and sharing of those grains subject to inventory, and to arrange for their shipment.”
In other words, it was an ALLIED organization. It made all wheat purchasing decisions for the ALLIES as a whole.

As Salter described it in his memoir: Image
Reflecting on it later, Monnet fully recognized the significance: Image
The Wheat Executive was so successful that, a year latter, the Europeans and Americans would use the Wheat Executive as the model from creating the Allied Maritime Transport Council (AMTC), which would facilitate ALL supply purchases and transport for the allies. Image
What does all of this mean for the current supply chain issues?

In a word: cooperation.

In two words: international organization
Global supply chains can't be left to the "good planning" of individual companies and the regulations of individual governments. The modern global economy requires the equivalent of the "Wheat Executive" for the sake of coordination and information sharing.
Back in May, @AtlanticCouncil proposed that 🇺🇸🇯🇵 take the lead on this effort. Could they play the roles played by 🇬🇧🇫🇷 100 years ago? If so, who will be the equivalent of Salter and Monnet?
atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-resea…
If governments don't take such steps to improve global coordination, then I suppose there is another benefit (h/t @TheOnion)
theonion.com/white-house-wa…
In sum, current shortages are due to long standing issues with global supply chains. #COVID19 now, like World War I 100 years ago, shocked an already fragile system. The solution, then and now, lies in international politics -- creating international organization.

[END]
P.S. All of the information regarding World War I is based on an exciting project I'm working on with @rosellacappella on how allied economic cooperation during the "Great War" set the foundation for institutions that govern the current "Global Economy"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

Apr 21
The House passed a defense supplement for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.

Ukraine aid was the most controversial portion of the supplement and might cost Speaker Johnson his leadership position.

Why did he do it?

[THREAD] Image
As is being reported, Johnson stated “To put it bluntly, I would rather send bullets to Ukraine than American boys. My son is going to begin in the Naval Academy this fall....This is not a game, this is not a joke.”
cnn.com/2024/04/21/pol…
While it's partly personal for Johnson, his remarks emphasize a larger point, one that I raised in a recent @WPReview column: cutting off US aid won't end the war. Instead, it would embolden Russia.
worldpoliticsreview.com/us-ukraine-aid…
Read 19 tweets
Apr 20
Let's do this.

A close reading of Donald Trump's recent description of the Battle of Gettysburg.

TL, DR: there were no pirates.

[THREAD] Image
ICYMI, here is a clip of what Trump said about the Battle of Gettysburg at his recent Pennsylvania rally

Let's start at the beginning:

"The Union was saved by the immortal heroes at Gettysburg"
Read 30 tweets
Apr 14
Are we on the brink of a larger Middle East War?

The risk increased in the past day, but is still low.

[SHORT THREAD]
Many of the points raised in 👇 🧵 from October still apply: larger wars happen because states want to be drawn in.

Is that still the case?
This @goodauth piece from October made related points about the tools states -- specifically Iran and Israel -- can use to control escalation.

goodauthority.org/news/will-the-…
Read 9 tweets
Apr 13
"International law is fake law."

"The only real law is domestic law."

Both statements are wrong. In some sense, the opposite might be true.

[THREAD] Image
As I wrote recently in @WPReview, international law is flawed. But flawed shouldn't be confused with pointless.

worldpoliticsreview.com/war-gaza-inter…
I emphasized how international law is part of a broader diplomatic process where states try to convey their preferences over policy.

In other words, from signing a treaty to filing a ICJ dispute, international law provides information.

journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Read 20 tweets
Apr 6
To truly understand the current value of NATO, you need to think about a world without NATO.

Such "counterfactual thinking" lies at the heart of policy analysis...and IR scholarship.

[THREAD] Image
This 🧵 builds on my latest @WPReview piece. I argued that NATO is more valuable than ever to its members. But how do we actually know that?

worldpoliticsreview.com/nato-ukraine-r…
The key is to ask, "if NATO wasn't here, what would happen?"
Read 26 tweets
Mar 30
NATO turns 75 years old this coming week.

To mark the event, here are 7 (and a half) historical facts about NATO.

[THREAD] Image
These facts draw from the #NATO7for70 series of 🧵 I wrote during NATO's 70th anniversary (along with *half* a new one). So this is essentially a 🧵 of🧵s.
Fact 1: NATO almost didn't happen. The negotiations were contentious, with France (yep, France) almost scuttling the whole deal. Lot's of contention over the treaty covering Algeria (then part of France) and including Italy.

Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(