Readers of Apocalypse Never will recall that the book pivoted around my visit to Britain in 2019, where I had the surreal experience of making the case for nuclear at 10 Downing Street, and to then Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, as Extinction Rebellion activists shut down London
Why, I wondered, were the people who claimed to be most apocalyptic about climate change — eg Extinction Rebellion activists glueing themselves to train cars — also the most opposed to nuclear power?
During our visit we received no support from supposedly pro-nuclear Brits, the most high-profile of whom had actually opposed a nuclear build-out, claiming that nuclear was too expensive — a bizarre claim coming from people who insisted that climate change would be apocalyptic
While there, I debated with energy experts who said Britain didn’t need nuclear because it could just build more wind turbines. I argued that wind wasn’t reliable (duh). Two years later, lack of wind triggered today’s energy crisis.
Today, with British factories shutting down due to energy scarcity, it’s clear that the cost of new nuclear in UK was always cheap, not expensive
Public consciousness must evolve: “levelized cost of electricity” (LCOE) doesn’t account for reliability & is thus grossly misleading
For the last five years My colleagues and I have argued that what nuclear needs more than anything else is for people to stand up for the tech, including and especially to the people who are most hostile to it, and trying to persuade them. Today’s victory is proof that it works.
Nuclear remains the most controversial tech in the world, and so it’s always two steps forward and one step backwards. It’s easy to get discouraged. That makes it all the more important to keep the faith.
Progressives are mad that Sen. Manchin killed the climate provisions in Biden's budget, but they shouldn't be. The provisions would have increased electricity prices, blackouts, and emissions. Congress should pass nuclear-focused legislation instead.
Progressives are mad that moderate Democratic @Sen_JoeManchin has reportedly opposed the inclusion of climate-related legislation in President Joe Biden’s budget “This is absolutely the most important climate policy in the package,” said Canadian political scientist @LeahStokes
Stokes helped write the legislation. “We fundamentally need it to meet our climate goals," she said, "That’s just the reality.”
But that’s not the reality. The “Clean Energy Performance Program” is not needed to meet climate goals, and might actually undermine them.
Over the last 6 years I warned policymakers directly in the US, Canada, Japan, UK, S. Korea, Netherlands, Philippines, and indirectly through the media, that over-reliance on renewables, & under-investment in reliable energy sources, threatened their economies & security.
In response the renewable energy industry waged a non-stop campaign to defame me, Democrats slandered me, and then denied me a chance to respond, & even some pro-nuclear people labeled me inflammatory for pointing out the obvious problems with renewables
A lot of people believe that the reason for the global energy crisis, which is threatening economic recovery, is because we didn’t do enough renewables, but the opposite is the case. Nations overinvested in weather-dependent renewables & under-invested in reliable power sources
Renewables will constitute 70% the $530 billion spent globally on new electricity generation capacity in 2021
It’s been that way for years. Had that money gone to reliable energy sources, there would be no global energy supply shortage
Climate activism helped create the energy supply shortages directly through pressure on companies and indirectly through policies that subsidized unreliable renewables and disincentivized reliable power.
A lot of people said we were transitioning to renewables but as energy prices have spiked, and renewables have faltered, nations including France, Britain, & Japan are returning to nuclear
It's true that cowardice is common but courage is contagious
National leaders around the world are announcing big plans to return to nuclear energy now that the cost of natural gas, coal, and petroleum are spiking, and weather-dependent renewables are failing to deliver.
“The number one objective is to have innovative small-scale nuclear reactors in France by 2030 along with better waste management,” said French President Emmanuel Macron.
For over a decade, the city of San Francisco has been carrying out an experiment. What happens when thousands of drug addicts are not only permitted to use heroin, fentanyl and meth publicly, but also enabled to do so? The results are in: hundreds of them die annually.
Last year, 712 people in San Francisco died from drug overdoses or poisoning, and this year a similar number are on track to do so.