This podcast is packed full of information, neuroscience and paradigm shifts. I’ll put a few thoughts below to whet your appetites. 1/
Mary Helen thinks we need a paradigm shift in education as fundamental as Copernicus - who first realised that the earth went around the sun and not vice versa. 2/
Early scientists looked up from the earth and tried to predict what was happening with the assumption that they were at the centre. It kind of worked, but there was lots that didn’t fit. 2/
After Copernicus, everything was different. All the data had to be reinterpreted in the light of this new perspective. New theories and models arose. 3/
In education, we’re sitting on the earth watching kids’ trajectories, trying to work out how to get them to change and go in the direction we’d like. Tweaks like ‘growth mindset’ are attempts to do this. 4/
The shift she suggested is that we put how it feels to be a thinking person in the system at the centre of the educational solar system. Then all of our other work should be centred around that. When we do this, many of the other problems disappear. 5/
This is beyond what is thought of as a whole child approach, it means we centre the experience and thinking of the learner. It implies that we should reinterpret the data we have to ask what it reveals about how it feels to be the person who was measured by that data point. 6/
She thinks that learning outcomes are important but these are not the metrics we should be centering our education system around. How the learner feels about what they are doing is more important than any information they remember in the long term. 7/
She thinks educators should be asking, what dispositions of heart and mind are we supporting in this setting? We need to shift the purpose of education from promoting learning outcomes to promoting human development. 8/
She uses the analogy of soccer - adults look at the game, people need strong legs to play, so we make the kids do weights to develop their muscles, send them off to the soccer field - but they can’t play! They don’t know how to do it, their learning was decontextualised. 9/
So school decontextualises learning and then we sent kids off into the real world to be autonomous citizens but they’ve never had a chance to practice really living and being a person with agency. 10/
From the neuroscience, what predicts young adult outcomes such as happiness, purpose in life, relationships is not how much they know, it’s how they think and the learning dispositions they bring to the world. 11/
Moving onto #cogsci, she says that there is a tendency to organise studies around what is easy to measure and then the system becomes organised around that. But what if learning info curated by someone else doesn’t help you live happily in the world in the long term? 12/
We need to understand that learning and development is not an efficient process.The messiness &non-linearity is important.Otherwise it’s like saying that babies should skip crawling &go right onto biking because they’ll never need to crawl as adults&so it’s a waste of time. 13/
So education has, from her perspective, the wrong aims. We should be thinking seriously about what it feels like to think within the system - do kids have agency? Are they engaging with complex information that they deeply care about?Are they able to bring all that they are?14/
To her, these things are the fundamentals. High control school environments actively dissuade these things because they focus on the wrong outcomes. They focus on outputs, on behaviour& production-and not what is actually going on inside a young person’s head&how they feel.15/
She says, when we micro-control young people and their learning, we rob them of the opportunity to develop inside themselves the capacity to manage themselves as thinkers. 16/
High-control learning environments steal real learning opportunities which are inevitably messy, inefficient, difficult and context-dependent. We clean it all up and by doing so rob YP of the change to learn how to manage for themselves when the structure is no longer there. 17/
She talks about different brain systems &how when we focus kids attention on the here & now, on goal directed outcomes &behaviour, we suppress activity in other brain networks which are not in the immediate here & now, which focus on deep understanding and complex problems. 18/
She says, adolescents need time to do both. They need time to be free form, out of the box thinkers. They need opportunities to think abstractly and deeply. Keeping them focused on outcomes and remembering actively stops this from happening. 19/
If kids don’t get the opportunities to practice managing their own thinking, chances to move themselves between goal directed work and a different way of thinking, Mary Helen says we can actually see the difference in their brains. They develop less effectively. 20/
And this lack of opportunity to develop thinking & your relationship to thinking in the messy, inefficient way which human development demands actually translates to less achievement and lower wellbeing as adults. 21/
I won’t go through the rest of it - this is a long podcast and she talks fast and says lots. But there were a couple of other aha moments for me. 22/
One was how emotion and cognition are always intertwined, but this doesn’t show up in scientific studies because emotion is effectively held constant in studies in order to focus on cognition. Real world learning is far messier. 23/
The separation between cognition and emotion is artificial, because the whole person always includes emotions, experiences, culture and what they feel about what they are doing is fundamental. 24/
My take: meaning and purpose are a fundamental part of learning.Putting the experience of the learner in the centre of the solar system means enabling autonomy and self-direction. It’s a paradigm shift which would have dramatic effects on wellbeing, motivation and learning. 25/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Naomi Fisher

Naomi Fisher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @naomicfisher

17 Oct
I often say that feeling a lack of control over your life contributes to poor mental health - and recently several people have asked for my evidence. It's such a well-established finding in psychology that I hadn't realised that it wasn't well known in the wider population.1/
This comes from many psychological theories - one I use is cognitive theory, which suggests that particular thoughts and beliefs about the world (like, I have no control, or I can't change anything) underpin and lead to emotional responses such as depression. 2/
It is also very well backed up with evidence. The research talks about control in many different ways, but one important way is agency - the belief that you can make choices and decisions to influence events and have an impact on the world. 3/
Read 22 tweets
1 Oct
Cultural capital and #cogsci. Cognitive scientists sometimes say that deprived children lack the background knowledge that other children acquire at home, and so the aim of education should be to even this out. 1/
One efficient way to do this, it’s said, is by explicitly teaching a body of facts which are said to make up the common knowledge that as as a culture we expect ‘well educated’ people to have. 2/
@DTWillingham suggests that this should be the back ground knowledge necessary to read a broadsheet newspaper or books written for the ‘intelligent layman’ on science or politics. This,he says, is the information which will have the greatest cognitive benefit.3/
Read 18 tweets
29 Sep
It is strange how many seem to believe that if we didn’t send children to school, they will remain in early childhood forever, playing, running around and exploring. 1/
School teaches that it is essential, and it seems we grow up to believe that. We can’t imagine how otherwise a person can develop into an adult. 2/
It is particularly strange because in many countries in the world today, lots of people do not go to school, and yet they grow up and become functioning adults. 3/
Read 14 tweets
6 Sep
Such an interesting episode on the science of learning with neuroscientist Samah Karaki and ⁦@teb_logan⁩. I had to listen to it twice. I’ll put some of my thoughts below. podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/fut…
1/ Dr Karaki starts by saying that she’s a neuroscientist by training, but she’s aware that it’s only one perspective. Her aim is to bring together ways of thinking about learning from biology, psychology and social science.
2/ She points out that education often ignores the fact that brains always exist in a cultural and social context, that learning does not happen in a vacuum. Experimental studies remove people from their context and so reduce learning to a technical process.
Read 22 tweets
29 Aug
‘Lack of psychologists hits pupils with special educational needs’ this article demonstrates how psychology is (inefficiently) being used to prop up the educational system which fails many children. Thread below. theguardian.com/education/2021…
1/ It works like this. Child is not thriving in the system, whether that is shown by distress, behaviour or academic difficulties. Child is referred to psychology where they often wait for a very long time.
2/ During this time, everyone’s energies are put into hoping that the assessment process will provide the desired solutions. Finally the top of the waiting list is reached.
Read 12 tweets
9 Jul
Systematic review of the applied research on how cognitive science is applied in schools by ⁦@TWPerry1⁩ and colleagues. Really interesting, I’ll put a few of my thoughts below.
1/ There’s an important distinction between basic research (or pure) and applied research. Basic research looks at cognitive processes and models, and constructs lab tests to pull apart different factors. Applied research is far more messy and harder to control.
2/ Cognitive theories focus on information processing and memory, but in the real world there are many other factors at play, such as student-specific, teacher-specific and environmental factors.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(