I often say that feeling a lack of control over your life contributes to poor mental health - and recently several people have asked for my evidence. It's such a well-established finding in psychology that I hadn't realised that it wasn't well known in the wider population.1/
This comes from many psychological theories - one I use is cognitive theory, which suggests that particular thoughts and beliefs about the world (like, I have no control, or I can't change anything) underpin and lead to emotional responses such as depression. 2/
It is also very well backed up with evidence. The research talks about control in many different ways, but one important way is agency - the belief that you can make choices and decisions to influence events and have an impact on the world. 3/
Developmental psychologists talk a lot about how agency develops in children - basically, they need opportunities to make meaningful choices and decisions. Taking the control from them, even if you think you know best, robs them of this chance. 4/
Here's an international expert in childhood talking about exactly that. She says that assuming that adults know best and protecting children from acting in a way which adults think isn't in their 'best interests' in the long term denies them agency. 5/thesector.com.au/2020/07/24/chi…
The research literature approaches this from many angles, one of which is locus of control. Having an internal locus of control (i.e. agency, or believing that you can make a meaningful difference to your life) is associated with better mental health in the long term. 6/
Here's a large 2021 study which looked at this in the UK and Japan. They conclude 'an external locus of control is associated with poor mental health regardless of cultural context'. 4/frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
Here's another study which finds that people who feel in control of their lives and who find purpose and meaning in life are less likely to develop anxiety disorder when things are tough.cam.ac.uk/research/news/…. 6/
Then there is self-determination theory, which suggests that autonomy, competence and relatedness enhance intrinsic motivation which in the long term leads to better learning and wellbeing. 7/
Niemiec & Ryan wrote a review. They say (with reference to education) 'Under such controlling conditions, however, the feelings of joy, enthusiasm, and interest that once accompanied learning are frequently replaced by experiences of anxiety, boredom, or alienation.'8/
Here's the chapter. semanticscholar.org/paper/Autonomy… 9/
I could go on, but you can google for yourselves. There is a lot of research which shows that feeling in control of your life and that you can make meaningful choices is good for your mental health and long term outcome. 10/
We learn this sense of agency as we grow and develop, and there are many factors which may mean a young person does not feel they can make meaningful choices or have any control - poverty, oppression, abuse, even the pandemic. 11/
But there is one thing which isn't inevitable - young people do not have to have their control taken away in the name of education. That is done because adults believe it is in their best interests to do so. They believe that young people must be made to learn. 12/
In their zeal to do so, they may focus on exam results and performance outcomes, and forget to ask how the young person feels about what they are doing - it doesn't seem as important as the exams or retaining subject information. 13/
But what if, by taking away young people's control over their lives in our desire to educate them, we are doing other damage? What if that sense of agency really matters - and is best learnt by exercising it throughout development? 14/
We could make school this amazing opportunity - no matter what else is going on in young people's lives outside, maybe school could be a place to practice making meaningful choices and decisions. They are there for 30 hours a week for 12-13 years. So much time.15/
But to do that, we the adults have to pivot. We have to let go of standardised test scores and the idea that we know best, and instead focus on creating the circumstances for children to thrive in whatever way works best for them. 16/
And that requires a serious rethink of our priorities, instead of test outcomes we need to think about how we can best help children to develop their sense of agency, to find meaning and purpose in their lives. 17/
Agency, meaning and purpose need to be lived. They can't be taught from a book or remembered from a lecture. You need lots of chances to make those decisions and see the consequences. Even if sometimes they are bad decisions. 18/
So that's why I keep saying that a sense of control is important. Currently we remove control from children in the name of education, and it makes no sense to do so. Not if we see education as a holistic, developmental process and not if we care about more than test results. 19/
And that's quite enough from me. I am going to exercise my agency and go to bed. Good night. 20/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Naomi Fisher

Naomi Fisher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @naomicfisher

16 Oct
This podcast is packed full of information, neuroscience and paradigm shifts. I’ll put a few thoughts below to whet your appetites. 1/
Mary Helen thinks we need a paradigm shift in education as fundamental as Copernicus - who first realised that the earth went around the sun and not vice versa. 2/
Early scientists looked up from the earth and tried to predict what was happening with the assumption that they were at the centre. It kind of worked, but there was lots that didn’t fit. 2/
Read 26 tweets
1 Oct
Cultural capital and #cogsci. Cognitive scientists sometimes say that deprived children lack the background knowledge that other children acquire at home, and so the aim of education should be to even this out. 1/
One efficient way to do this, it’s said, is by explicitly teaching a body of facts which are said to make up the common knowledge that as as a culture we expect ‘well educated’ people to have. 2/
@DTWillingham suggests that this should be the back ground knowledge necessary to read a broadsheet newspaper or books written for the ‘intelligent layman’ on science or politics. This,he says, is the information which will have the greatest cognitive benefit.3/
Read 18 tweets
29 Sep
It is strange how many seem to believe that if we didn’t send children to school, they will remain in early childhood forever, playing, running around and exploring. 1/
School teaches that it is essential, and it seems we grow up to believe that. We can’t imagine how otherwise a person can develop into an adult. 2/
It is particularly strange because in many countries in the world today, lots of people do not go to school, and yet they grow up and become functioning adults. 3/
Read 14 tweets
6 Sep
Such an interesting episode on the science of learning with neuroscientist Samah Karaki and ⁦@teb_logan⁩. I had to listen to it twice. I’ll put some of my thoughts below. podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/fut…
1/ Dr Karaki starts by saying that she’s a neuroscientist by training, but she’s aware that it’s only one perspective. Her aim is to bring together ways of thinking about learning from biology, psychology and social science.
2/ She points out that education often ignores the fact that brains always exist in a cultural and social context, that learning does not happen in a vacuum. Experimental studies remove people from their context and so reduce learning to a technical process.
Read 22 tweets
29 Aug
‘Lack of psychologists hits pupils with special educational needs’ this article demonstrates how psychology is (inefficiently) being used to prop up the educational system which fails many children. Thread below. theguardian.com/education/2021…
1/ It works like this. Child is not thriving in the system, whether that is shown by distress, behaviour or academic difficulties. Child is referred to psychology where they often wait for a very long time.
2/ During this time, everyone’s energies are put into hoping that the assessment process will provide the desired solutions. Finally the top of the waiting list is reached.
Read 12 tweets
9 Jul
Systematic review of the applied research on how cognitive science is applied in schools by ⁦@TWPerry1⁩ and colleagues. Really interesting, I’ll put a few of my thoughts below.
1/ There’s an important distinction between basic research (or pure) and applied research. Basic research looks at cognitive processes and models, and constructs lab tests to pull apart different factors. Applied research is far more messy and harder to control.
2/ Cognitive theories focus on information processing and memory, but in the real world there are many other factors at play, such as student-specific, teacher-specific and environmental factors.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(