I can’t attest to the accuracy of this post making the rounds on Chinese social media. It purports to summarize reforms proposed by Minister of Education Huai Jinpeng, who took office in Aug. Rumors of major changes have been abroad a while but this would be quite extreme. 1/N
Huai was formerly president of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, vice-minister of the MIIT, deputy secretary of the Tianjin Municipal Committee, and secretary of the Party Group of the Chinese Association for Science and Technology. 2/N
Right up top is a new emphasis on physical education, meant to combat “the phenomenon of feminization of boys,” (heteronormative much?) stressing major ball sports. It also calls for the construction of more sports facilities in communities. 3/N
The next one would be huge. Compulsory education would be shifted to end with two years of high school, with foreshortened elementary school (4 years from 6), and eliminating pre-kindergarten (小升初, not sure what that means). 4/N
It calls for much earlier tracking and toward one of three types of high school: specialized, general, and vocational. The aim is to create students adapted to “social survival” and work after high school. 5/N
All current technical high schools will be demoted (下放為) to vocational high schools, and the current practice of awarding senior technician certificates to students still in school will be stopped. 6/N
Another big one: university reform. Over one-third of universities will be transformed to engineering or “high-level blue-collar universities” (高级蓝领大学), focused on training of senior technical workers, to lay the foundation for the 4th Industrial Revolution. 7/N
To quickly change the current situation of college students with “grand visions but low skills, high test scores but low abilities” and to increase society’s respect for labor and workers, and “truly realize the glory of labor and equality or all.” This is really at the core. 8/N
Emphasis on correct socialist values and worldview, allowing children to enjoy learning and reducing the burden on them, having families shoulder more of the burden, and cultivating diverse talent. 9/N
Huai has pushed a concept called “有温度的教育” (an education with warmth?) which stresses “interpersonal communication, humanistic communication, human qualities, teamwork, and especially confidence in culture and understanding of society.” 10/N
The piece ends with a quote from Huai: "In today's increasingly fierce game between major powers, the technology battle is also a battle over standards, economics, and morality.” 11/N
“We need to convince people with reason and innovation and creativity. We also need to persuade people with virtue and adhere to integrity and to ethics. We need to put people first and promote human welfare." 12/N
So I read this — again, with the caveat that I don't know whether this is "official" or comes from Huai himself — as the education component of the Red New Deal. It reflects many themes we've already seen emerge. 13/N
The thrust is to restore dignity to technical education, to labor and to manufacturing. China clearly wants to avoid a hollowing out of manufacturing, to preserve process knowledge. The underlying belief is that innovation and manufacturing are inextricably linked. 14/N
It's not clear to me whether all three types of high schools will continue to be three year (10th through 12th), or whether the vocational will only be two years. I would appreciate any clarification! 15/N END (for now)
PS: Let me reiterate that this is NOT an official post. In fact on higher-visibility platforms like Sohu, the piece seems already to have been deleted. I have doubts especially about specific policy proposals, though much of this does accord with things Huai has said publicly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Xi Jinping's essay on "common prosperity" in Qiushi has been published. DeepL translates it pretty decently if you don't feel like slogging through the Chinese. qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2021-…
Early into the essay (from a speech delivered in August), he warns about the dangers of income inequality, political polarization, the tearing of the social fabric, the collapse of the middle class, and the rise of populism in "some countries." Insists China won't go that way.
Says "obvious and substantial progress" will have been made by 2035 toward the equalization of basic public services, and basic realization of "common prosperity" for all the people by mid-century (read: 2049).
On this week's @SinicaPodcast, leading Taiwan scholar Shelley Rigger of Davidson College discusses her excellent new book 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘳 𝘓𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘯: 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘛𝘢𝘪𝘸𝘢𝘯 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢'𝘴 𝘌𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘙𝘪𝘴𝘦. supchina.com/podcast/how-ta…
We also publish a transcript of our podcast for those who prefer reading. You can find that here: supchina.com/2021/10/14/a-h…
Shelley brings up something that way too many mainlanders fail to recognize and internalize: That Taiwan's colonization from 1895 to 1945 created a vast "psychological distance" from the mainland during exactly the period where modern Chinese nationalism was formed.
There’s a Chinese language Clubhouse room on the Xinjiang camps right now.
Some fantastically candid things being said. One woman asked, earnestly, how to handle the sense of offense, her instinctive defensiveness, as a Han person confronted with allegations and evidence of the atrocity. Absent so far is any overt denial or apologism.
To be sure, there's skepticism and a lot of watering-down and defensiveness – "Well, isn't it right to try to prevent a 9/11?" and the like – but anything nudging people into more of a shared reality I count as a victory.
1/ You’ve probably seen the photo of Trump’s modified speech, where he crossed out “Corona” and wrote in “Chinese.” This was a deliberate provocation, and he said as much even before the pictures were out. He'll doubtless use it again in his upcoming press conference.
2/ But even if Trump is not a hateful bigot – and there’s every reason to believe he is – then at the least, he’s unacceptably tolerant of bigotry and insensitive to how he is fomenting it. He is endangering people who look like my wife, and my children, and many of my friends.
3/ I’ve already heard and read dozens of anecdotes, including several from my own close friends, about incidents of overt racism toward people who look “Chinese” – even though they may be of Korean, Taiwanese, Japanese, or another East Asian ancestry.