I've also found this is why I rarely write in a linear fashion. I tend to have a very rough timeline of events, and then over time scenes within that just get written as the right emotional mood hits me, or a smell triggers me etc. etc.
Then BOSH. 2000 more words done.
Also means I'm hugely wasteful as a writer. I end up throwing away a LOT when the full story starts to emerge and suddenly 'scenes' don't fit.
Which is agonising enough in the short story format. I'm discovering it's utterly traumatising (but necessary) in the novel process.
E.g I couldn't have written the first draft of this 'scene' anywhere other than while sitting in a pub in the rain, on a weekday, watching London go about its business.
Been tweaked a lot since. But it only popped into my head because I felt it.
Then I realised it fit that particular character, her thoughts and her motivations. Thus it became part of her story.
Whether it survives to the final version of the manuscript remains to be seen.
Guess the 'lesson' such as there is from this (Which is only for me. Every writer is different.) is I realised a long time ago that what I needed on my mental post it note at all times was:
"If you feel it. WRITE IT. NOW. Worry about where it goes, and making it better, later."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, yes, I know any MP COULD vote against the whip, theoretically, but there is always a lot of nuance in play with that. Let's not pretend there isn't. It's not how life works.
A big issue these days is removing nuance and oversimplification of politics.
Yes, I know that there's a tiny bit of grey writing on the full voting record page that gives some vague indication of whether they toed the party line, but that's really not clear enough.
Because in most instances, it's the BIGGEST driver of how they voted.
Now OBVIOUSLY if you're writing an effing academic paper on it, or a book aimed at historians (paid or amateur) then you need the extra precision.
But think about your audience, and err towards under, not over-explaining.
Make an emotional connection first. Battalions later.
I care about which battalions it was. I should be able to tell you which battalions it was if you ask (or at the very least point you to where you can find out).
But that's because I'm already interested in that stuff.
Anyone who thinks MPs are lazy hasn't seen how much time Stella Creasy has to spend each week writing to TfL about the lift at Walthamstow Central being broken again.
(I'm not being snarky here. She's an insanely good constituency MP)
I honestly think it would be quicker if TfL just gave her a JIRA account.
There's a reason she wins the seat in General Elections with the kind of majority that would make Saddam Hussein blush.
"Housing costs are not included on the assumption that most pensioners have paid off mortgages."
Fixed that for you, BBC/Loughborough Uni.
(Also, not being funny, but when I retire and don't have to work anymore, 10k a year is going to be my annual bar tab. But that may be just me)
"For the first time in the assessment, Netflix subscriptions and items such as haircuts are included"
Remember kids, the people who do one of the best known pension requirement calculations started factoring in Netflix and chill before they factored in the lack of home-ownership