The Government have decided that they're going to throw out parts of the Northern Ireland protocol in order to "Get Brexit Done" 1/39
As a reminder, they've been attempting to get Brexit done for 6 years and have only succeeded in gaslighting the UK public, throwing out multiple workable deals (including Johnson's "Oven Ready one) and are now on the cusp of breaking International law 2/39
But it's okay though! They've wheeled out several minister who all confirm we're not in fact breaking International Law because Northern Ireland is in "grave and imminent peril" and that means they can do what they want 3/39
I'm not going to quote tweet this as I'm having a hard time keeping up with replies to the original thread and don't want an additional pile on - check my tweets/replies for what's going on
I've read the replies
They're predominantly anti-MSM (old media) and pro YouTube (new media)
What I find interesting is Tenbarge used to work for an online company (new media) and moved to NBC (old media)
See the disconnect there?
Just because you report on online stuff for (old) MSM doesn't mean that you're not part of the MSM system
It works in a certain way, it has certain expectations and certain rules on how it reports events
I'm just look at the UK media (MailOnline or Daily Express anyone?)
Anti-Vaxxers recently served an NHS hostpital in Colchester with "Legal Documents"
I've already covered the Nurember Code that they site, and broken down why these documents probably aren't as legal as they think they are but one of the things that they mentioned was Motu proprio - which a few of us have nicknamed the "pope code"
So what is it?
I've already covered the Nuremberg Code that they cite, and broken down why these documents probably aren't as legal as they think they are but one of the things that they mentioned was Motu proprio - which a few of us have nicknamed the "pope code"
Apparently anyone can serve legal documents in England
It is recommended that you use a professional process server though as if the papers are not served correctly it can mean big issues in your court case later on.
Do we think these papers were served correctly?
At a bare minimum, the woman forced to receive these "legal documents" would have had to sign for each envelope to show that she received them
She would also have to agree that she is capable of acting as a representative of the person named in the papers