Here we go I guess. Iβve been meaning to write this for a while now but took some time off from writing for a while.
Figured now is as good a time as any to talk about freedom in One Piece.
I particularly want to talk about Luffyβs changing ideals of freedom, especially before and after Marineford.
Iβll reference a couple of other threads during this and post links at the bottom though.
First and foremost, Luffy is an existentialist, he primarily acts on acts of his own agency and Free will and I believe that this from Luffy is where many of the misconceptions of freedom in One Piece form.
Because all thought Luffy acts freely he is fundamentally not free.
Though Luffy may be an existentialist and free to choose his actions and willing to do exactly what he wants when he wants, so long as people stand in his way he is not free to control the aftermath.
Due to his upbringing with Ace and Sabo the three all strive to become Pirates for different reasons. Ace to prove heβs different from his βevilβ bloodline, Sabo to escape his Royal bloodβ¦
And Luffy to become the freest man on the sea.
To Luffy, being the Pirate King is having been so free that you can travel anywhere unchallenged. He doesnβt intend to rule the world, he intends to see it. Unbound Adventure.
Luffy goes where he wants and does what he wants, he is free to the extent that he largely always can control where he goes, and if there are things in his way he removes them.
This largely ties into the concept of Luffyβs amorality and lack of will to be a hero, because heroβs cannot do what they want, they must act heroically and this restricts them.
Luffy is free to choose who he helps and when.
He repeatedly throws Lawβs plans out the window as soon as his own desire to see an enemy defeated overwhelms the common sense route of the plan.
Luffy charges at Caesar, Doffy and Kaido one after the other to help spread freedom as he sees it.
Doflamingo in particular gives us a clear image of Luffyβs obsession with freedom, his strings wrap and constrict and bind everything beneath him and form a physical barrier to Luffyβs freedom, βsuffocatingβ him.
But Luffyβs ideals of freedom are different before and after the Timeskip (well actually before and after they meet Aokiji but thatβs slightly different.)
Throughout the pre Timeskip Luffy recklessly acts as he wants and does what he wants.
But following the crews decimation at the hands of a single Admiral the idea is planted in Luffyβs head that he is perhaps not as free as he originally thought.
Suddenly there are obvious things in Luffyβs path which may inhibit his adventure.
At this point Luffy begins to strive to grow stronger, heβll need to be able to protect the things he loves if he wants to live the way he wants to.
This slowly builds from this point onwards, Admirals, Warlords, The Government itself, all become obstacles.
This culminates at Sabaody. Luffy pushes against the world as he wishes and suddenly the world starts pushing back and placing restraints on him.
Luffyβs weakness to protect what he loves leads to his crew being blown apart by Kuma.
These events followed by Luffy charging into a war only to not be able to protect Ace makes Luffy realise fully that he is not truly free unless he can defeat absolutely anyone who may be able to take away the things he loves.
Because Luffyβs concept of freedom is tied to his concept of adventure, and his sense of adventure is tied to his love of his friends, his found family.
This culminates in Luffyβs declaration of his weakness. While bound in bandages he effectively declares he is not free.
From the return to Sabaody Luffy becomes more fixated on protecting everything and taking everything on his shoulders, we see this fully on Onigashima as he becomes more and more fixated on fighting Kaido alone, to protect everyone.
Luffyβs Pirate King dream has become a combination of his desire to be free to adventure and his realisation that to truly be free he must be able to protect what is dear to him.
So long as the Government can take away what he loves Luffy isnβt truly free.
This doesnβt detract from his existentialism or his personal freedom of choice, it just means that within the grander scheme of things Luffy canβt really be free until nothing can stop him doing what he wants. Action without negative consequences.
Thatβs about all I have to say, I just wanted to talk about the difference between freedom of agency and freedom from consequence.
Iβll drop links to @ThePhantomStra5 βs threads on Luffyβs existentialism & his thread on the post-Marineford moment as well as my own on morality.
Also Iβve only tackled Luffyβs personal and internalised concept of freedom here, Iβll drop another short thread of him imbuing freedom on others and how that escalates as he becomes stronger in the story.
A core theme surrounding Kaido throughout his run as the primary antagonist of One Pieceβs Yonko Saga has been his obsession with death. Kaido is introduced trying to kill himself and immediately ties himself to a core principal.
Kaido is shown to be too strong to die. However, his introductory chapter brings about somewhat of a controversy: at face value he wants to die so badly he is willing to kill himself but this is a falsehood.