UK govt has finally published details of its heat & buildings strategy, which will be out in full tomorrow
🎯new gas boiler ban* from 2035
💷£3.9bn funding inc £450m for heat pumps
📜shift levies off electricity bills over 10yrs
🔥decision on hydrogen heat in 2026
THREAD
First, why does this matter?
The UK's way off track against its legally-binding climate goals, inc net-zero by 2050 & the interim carbon budgets for late 2020s onwards
We can expect more on how govt expects to close gap tomorrow (?) w publication of delayed UK net-zero strategy
But heat and buildings probably the trickiest area in political terms: it's up close & personal, it could be disruptive – low-carbon heat's currently expensive
Overall, UK has made rapid recent progress thanks to nearly phasing out coal in power sector, but CO2 from homes is actually *increasing* making it the 2nd largest source of emissions after transport
Homes (largely their gas boilers) = 16% of UK GHGs
So what's in this new strategy?
🎯"Ban" on new gas boilers from 2035
Press release wording is loose, saying govt has a "confirmed ambition" that all new heating systems from 2035 will be low carbon
That's…not a ban
What does "confirmed ambition" mean?
Back in the Energy White Paper, govt said it "expected" new heating installs to be low carbon by the mid-2030s
Being a cynic, I'd say "confirmed ambition" is constructively ambiguous enough for all in Cabinet to agree to & to spin as appropriate
So…it's a ban! But also, not a ban!
Given press around this, I'm not surprised.
(+Basically if market/public treats as ban, it's a ban.)
(The press release stresses that "no-one will be forced to remove their existing fossil fuel boilers".
Anyone using the phrase "forced to rip out their boilers" should henceforth put £1 in the naughty jar.)
On to the funding…
💷 £3.9bn is…not anywhere close, even with existing spend, to making up the £9.2bn for home energy efficiency improvements pledged in the Tory manifesto
In terms of funding, £450m over 3yrs –at £5,000 per home– is just 30,000 installations/yr, barely an increase on current rates & WAY short of govt target for 600,000/yr by 2028 (it'd pay for 5% of that)
CCC says we need 100k/yr in existing homes to 2025
But govt making big play on innovation, with £60m to help make heat pumps as cheap as or cheaper than gas boilers by 2030 – with cost reductions of 25-50% "expected" by 2025
*If* that happens, need for grants falls away
(Here's the latest on current heat pump costs from @JennyC_Hill at the CCC)
Govt leaving a decision on hydrogen heat until 2026
By then, govt saying heat pumps 50% cheaper + being installed at scale…
Draw your own conclusions 🤷♂️
(Don't be surprised if there is nevertheless plenty of coverage around hydrogen heat tomorrow – I've personally received a bunch of press releases touting it as a solution for low-carbon heat.)
NEW: UK climate advisers now "more optimistic" net-zero goals can be met
🎯Net-zero "possible" + "good for economy"
📉CO2 halved vs 1990
📈More "credible" policies
🚘🏡EV/heat pumps soaring
But…
⚡"Critical" to cut power prices
✈️Flight CO2 "risk"
1/9
For the first time I can remember, the CCC says its progress report is "optimistic" about UK climate goals being hit. Interim chair Prof Piers Forster says he is "more optimistic" than last yr due to last govt's policies starting to deliver + changes since Labour took office
2/9
Another notable change is that the CCC seems to be getting less prescriptive…
CCC has faced (inaccurate) charges that it has, in effect, set govt policy. But it's now being clearer than ever that it only offers advice – and policy is up to govt.
IEA: Oil still on track to peak by 2030; oil for fuel to peak in 2027
"annual growth slows…to just a trickle over the next several years, with a small decline expected in 2030, based on today’s policy settings and market trends"
Here are some of the most striking charts 🧵 1/8
In recent years, global oil demand has been almost entirely driven by growth in China…
…and that party is now over
Equally, US "dominance" of rising oil supply is also a thing of the past 2/8
Since last year, the IEA has raised its oil demand outlook for the US, due to EV rollbacks etc, but it has simultaneously cut its outlook for China by the same amount
So global demand in 2030 is right where the IEA thought it would be last year 3/8
In Q1 of 2025, the clean-energy driven drop in power sector CO2 outweighed small increases in other sectors of China's economy, driving a 1.6% fall year-on-year overall
FACTCHECK: Almost all the headlines on Tony Blair / net-zero are *wildly* inaccurate
REALITY:
1️⃣Net-zero is *only way* to stop warming
2️⃣Blair calls for tech to "turbocharge our path to net-zero"
3️⃣He categorically *does not* say "net-zero is doomed to fail"
🧵 1/6
Blair says a "strategy based on either 'phasing out' fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail"
This is logically & categorically not the same as saying "net-zero is doomed to fail"
(If you can't see why, I can't help you) 2/6
Nor does Blair say "current net-zero policies are doomed"
Because literally no govt in the world has a current net-zero policy to "phase out fossil fuels in the short term or limit consumption"
Instead, world's govts agreed at COP28 to "transition away from fossil fuels" 3/6
NEW: Official advisers CCC say UK shld cut emissions 87% by 2040
⚖️Net cost of net-zero 73% less than thought
💷Total cost to 2050 = £108bn (~£4bn/yr, 0.2% GDP)
🏡🚗H’hold energy/fuel bills to fall £1,400
🔌Electrification is key
THREAD: New UK govt contract with Drax biomass power plant
* 4-yr contract 2027-2031
* £113/MWh (2012 prices – £155 in today's money)
* Output cap of 6TWh (<2% of UK supplies, cf recent yrs 12-15TWh)
* CfD cost ~£500m/yr
* 100% of fuel must be "sustainable", up from 70% 1/5
UK govt says the contract helps security of electricity supplies, but gives Drax a "much more limited role than today" ie it's limited to run at roughly 25% of its max output
This means it's mainly going to be running when it isn't windy
Drax has had issues with existing 70% sustainable sourcing rule, but as it'll need less than half the fuel it has been buying to date, the new 100% rule looks more achievable
Notably, new contract terms allow govt to reclaim subsidy if rule not met