Thread/ The replies to my article mocking the 100k "Hezbollah fighters" claim tend to argue that "no, it is possible." Come on folks...run the numbers.
Who are Hezbollah supporters? Some of the Shi'ites in Lebanon. That's the basic pool of people who join Hezbollah, besides some folk from Syria or Iraq who somehow found their way to the group.
Given the principle pool is Lebanon. And it's among Shi'ites and it's a segment of those Shi'ites. What number do you think the pool of potential supporters is? Let's say out of maybe 7 million Lebanese...are we talking 1-2 million potential supporters?
Now wait a sec. We need to look at the supporters as a traditional demographic pyramid with men and women, children and elderly. So what percent of those supporters are military age men who conceivably could join and train? 500,000 men? And what percent them 18-40
So people are saying that basically every man within that group who could potentially have joined, did join...did get trained? Really? Like it was 100% recruitment...
Is it possible Hezbollah thinks it can draw on a pool of 100,000 men. Sure. Is it plausible they trained them all? No.
Someone wrote that Hamas has like 25,000 fighters...well Hamas draws on like 2 million people in the Gaza Strip and those people are completely stuck there.
So Hamas, with 2 million people at hand, could only get 25,000 men under arms. Hezbollah...which operates in a much more free environment, unable to forcibly recruit and not relying on destitute men...has four times that?
By contrast the Israeli Haganah that transformed from a fighting force to the IDF in 1948-49 had like 30,000 to then 60,000 fighters, including women I think. And it had the yishuv population of around a million or so to draw on.
It's just not reasonable to come up with this 100,000 figure except through extreme exaggeration or counting old men who once were linked to Hezbollah and teens who went to a "summer camp" or whatever. Hard core actual fighters is like a quarter of that maybe...maybe.
But exaggeration isn't unique to Hezbollah. I read that Iran pretends its Basij has between 5 million to 7 million and even up to 20 million...because they just count everyone as a member...but that's not really reliable.
Countries that pretend every military age male is a potential fighter can draw all sorts of stats, but anyone who studies war knows that this is not how war works. Even in times of extreme crisis with mass mobilization...not everyone goes to fight.
You can of course look to history to the Paraguayan War, the last year of Nazi Germany, the last year of the Confederacy or other examples where societies tried to mobilize everyone...like the Soviets did for war as well..and some of these were real machine economies.
Hezbollah has a good organization but by nature good organizations like Hezbollah are lean and small, that's why they are successful, when they pretend to take in "everyone" they will grow blubbery and fail.
Those are my thoughts on the "it's possible" model for Hezbollah size. Anyway do your own comparisons with the PMU or Houthis or whoever.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That’s a new low for the pro-Ankara desk, to whitewash and deny the Armenian Genocide as “upheavals”…I wonder if they also call the Holocaust “upheavals”. Why is it that when it comes to reporting on Ankara, the Ankara desk is more far-right and reactionary than the regime
It’s not an “upheaval” when people are systematically ethnic cleansed and deported and genocided. The same media can report with empathy about migrants at the US border, why can’t they have empathy for Armenians? And also why do they continue to whitewash genocide in Afrin?
These same media talk about “facts matter” and “truth matters” and “democracy dies in darkness”….well describing extermination and genocide as “upheavals” is exactly how truth is eviscerated.
If rockets were used to target Tanf, the operator has to fire them from somewhere and there is a 55-kilometer zone around their military base near al-Tanf...so that is beyond range of 107mm and near 122mm rockets, right? So what kind of rockets? Drones is easier to use.
That is why drones were used against Erbil and other areas in KRG because rockets are very difficult to get into place in Nineveh in range. There were several rocket attacks also on Erbil but they were not very precise. The drone attacks by contrast hit a hangar. See.
We know this because the pro-Iran groups used rockets dozens of times from 2019 to 2020 but transitioned to drones in 2021. This is well known. And documented. mideastcenter.org/post/rockets-f…
What a strange article, it claims to give us the “story” behind the outrage, casts doubt on official reports but then the entire article is just speculation and has no further details, didn’t interview anyone; it’s not opinion based on any additional facts, just casting doubt.Odd
I won’t post a link to it because I think that major media has a responsibility, if they are going to call into question a widely reported rape, and pretend there is “the story behind” that they will provide info and not just muddy the waters
Also the bizarre speciation that the bystanders were afraid but also that one filmed it and didn’t call the police….and that the bystanders may also be racist. Well which is it? Were they afraid, or racist? Why film it but not call police?
The Defense Ministry has successfully carried out a series of interceptions to shoot down drones with a powerful airborne laser system installed on a civilian light aircraft. m.jpost.com/israel-news/is…
Back in 2020 “Israel is developing lasers to defeat drones, rockets, artillery, mortars and anti-tank guided missiles, its Defense Ministry announced Jan. 8, calling the effort a major breakthrough by its Directorate of Defense Research and Development.” defensenews.com/industry/techw…
New in #IsraelDefenseNews; Israel Weapon Industries (IWI) - a member of the SK Group and leader in the production of combat-proven small arms for military forces, police etc announces the expansion of its comprehensive range of riot-
control solutions
2/ launching the GAL Versatile Protective Suit (VPS). "Designed for the protection of forces while maintaining public order, the lightweight, wearable
protection system is adaptable to all scenarios.
The GAL VPS absorbs massive kinetic trauma and reduces and diverts"
"the transfer of a blow to the body. A comprehensive, 3-level operational solution, the GAL VPS is flexible and easy to wear. It includes a vest and arm and leg protectors, all anti-trauma, and weighs just 4.4 kg
at W2 and 5.9kg at W4, making it most lightweight protective suit"
Remember all that mumbo-jumbo about a borderless world and globalization blah blah…well turns out that this is a world is walls and MORE walls everyday, and soon it will all be walls. A divided, totalitarian world is what this century brings. Boxes and more alertness. Bigotry
I had to sit through these ridiculous classes in university where people would talk about their world without borders….yeah it was tried in Schengen, I was there in HU in 2015 when it began to breakdown, also saw the border wall Ankara put up, I saw the one Israel built etc etc
When I was in high school people used to go leave water for migrants crossing from Mexico in Arizona…now there are walls and more walls…I think basically everywhere I’ve been I’ve seen the walls and fences go up. And then the pandemic and more CCTV etc etc