The biggest problem with this analysis is that it tends to see a revived (“post-liberal”) conservatism as a basically Catholic phenomenon.
/2
Every connection with Catholicism is spelled out. But when Jews such as @oren_cass and @josh_hammer are discussed as leading (“post-liberal) conservative figures, somehow the fact that they are Jews doesn’t come up.
/3
Similarly, the growing post-liberalism among Protestants is left out entirely. No mention is made of the fact that Orban and many of the yound men and women around him are committed Protestants. Or of the signs of a “post-liberal” Protestant conservatism rising in the US.
/4
Once you recognize that the rejection of liberalism is a growing intellectual position among Catholics, Protestants, and Jews, the picture looks rather different.
/5
It isn’t just something peculiar about Catholic intellectuals and the European Catholic tradition. It’s a much deeper phenomenon touching on issues that speak to most conservatives, regardless of their particular religious and national affiliation.
/6
Almost all of the (“post-liberal”) conservative figures you name will be there—speaking alongside anti-Marxist liberals who are increasingly willing to consider an alliance.
/8
That’s the real political landscape emerging on the right:
Conservative Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, and Jews who are critical of liberalism working together—and increasingly being joined by anti-Marxist liberals too.
That’s the big story to pay attention to.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The "spirit" is something real in all human beings--what the Bible calls "ruah" and Plato calls "thymos."
It's what allows us to be angry and sad, to want things and to strive for truth and to be loyal and connected to our family and nation and to stand in awe before God.
/1
But it means little to "be spiritual." Human beings are all, by nature, "spiritual."
/2
The question is what we do with this spirit that is inside us:
Do we use it to accomplish important and good things, or evil? Do we use it puff ourselves full of vanity, or to reach beyond ourselves and become part of a larger family, congregation, and nation?
/3
There was always a problem with the academic study of “classical antiquity,” which was built around the assumption that the West was descended from Greece and Rome—but not from Israel and the Bible. nationalreview.com/news/princeton…
This was an “Enlightenment” theory and it was a nasty one. It was anti-Semitic and anti-Christian too.
But the destruction of Classics department at Princeton, where I went to school is a shameful thing.
I have always thought Classics students should study Hebrew alongside Greek and Latin.
Catholic friends have been urging me to read Waldstein on the common good. So I finally did.
I won’t comment on the theology. But as political theory this essay is naive and misguided. As a basis for political conservatism, it’s a non-starter. /1 thejosias.com/2015/02/03/the…
There are a several problems here. But let’s begin at the end:
Waldstein wants to found the political theory of the state on the thesis that the “primary intrinsic common good” of every legitimate state is “peace.”
(Thesis 34)
I’m sure peace is an aspect of the common good. /2
And it seems that Waldstein wants to define peace in a technical way that expands its meaning, which is fine.
But Waldstein is making the same mistake that is rightly condemned by conservatives when the come across it in liberal political theory:
/3
I don’t accept this new norm, which supposes that when a public figure dies, it’s a signal for everyone who disagreed with him in life to start dancing on his grave.
A decent public culture regards funerals as a time when each of us looks for the positive meaning that can be found in the life of the deceased.
And if we absolutely can’t bring ourselves to abide by this civilized and civilizing custom, then at the very least we can honor those who are grieving by keeping quiet and saving what we have to say for another time.
If you learn the Mosaic Ten Precepts in school, you at least have to discuss the topic of honoring your father and mother—and what you owe older people and ancestors more generally.
When Bible education was eliminated from the schools, all this became alien terrain.
When you come from a traditional society, the entire spectacle of young employees telling their bosses how to run a university or a newspaper looks obscene.