In an open letter, an employee of German public broadcaster ARD for 12 years is critical of one and a half years of Corona coverage: Ole Skambraks claims these questions do not get the attention they should ... 0/
1. Why do we know so little about “gain of function research” (which aims at making viruses more dangerous to humans)?
2. Why does the new Infection Protection Act state that the basic right to bodily integrity and the inviolability of one’s home may be restricted henceforth – even without an epidemic situation?
3. Why must people who have already had Covid-19 still get the jab, even though they are at least as well protected as those who are vaccinated?
4. Why are we not talking about ”Event 201” and the global pandemic exercises held shortly before the spread of SARS-CoV-2 — at all, or only in the context of conspiracy theories?
5. Why was the internal document from German Interior Ministry — a document known to the media and in which the authorities were asked to create a “shock effect” to underscore the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on human society — not published in full and discussed publicly?
6. Why is the study by Professor Ioannidis on survival rates (99.41% for people under 70) not featured in the headlines, while the fatally flawed, inflated figures produced by Imperial College were? medrxiv.org/content/10.110… dailysceptic.org/the-imperial-m…
7. Why does it say, in a document produced for the German Federal Ministry of Health, that Covid-19 patients stood for no more than 2% of the burden of hospitals during 2020?
8. Why does Bremen have the by far the highest incidence (113 as at 04/10/21) and at, the same time, by far the highest vaccination rate in Germany (79%)?
9. Why were payments of 4 million euro paid into a family account belonging to EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides, who was responsible for concluding the first EU vaccine contracts with pharmaceutical companies?
10. Why are people suffering severe vaccine injury not featured to the same extent as people with severe Covid-19 disease were in 2020?
11. Why is no one disturbed by the irregular way of counting “breakthrough infections” in vaccinated people?
12. Why does the Netherlands report clearly higher volumes of side effects of the Covid-19 vaccines than other countries?
13. Why has the efficacy description of the Covid-19 vaccines published on the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut website been changed three times in the last few weeks?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Having been astonished lately to find a seemingly anti-censorship organisation - @IndexCensorship - publishing defamatory nonsense *advocating* censorship, it is an intellectual relief, if a serious ethical & political concern, to learn it's spook-fed. morningstaronline.co.uk/article/weeken…
It's part of a wider problem: 'The infiltration & manipulation of press freedom & human rights groups by the intelligence services is merely an extension of the cold war efforts to ensure that they remain largely ineffective & steer any campaign into safe, apolitical liberalism.'
Edward Said reflected on the wider problem of 'the insidious intellectual abuses of American power' in this book review from 1999: lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v21/…
The big question here is: Why is CIJA (Commission for International Justice and Accountability) mounting an elaborate sting operation on the citizen investigator?
Here are McKeigue's statement and earlier questions to CIJA director: syriapropagandamedia.org/personal-state… bbc.co.uk/news/uk-565256…
CIJA - and Tsamota, a group of companies with the same director - were previously investigated by European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). CIJA has been funded by several governments, including UK.
In the news last year:
CIJA's operation has also been investigated by @MaxBlumenthal and @BenjaminNorton for Grayzone, who found it 'collaborated with al-Qaeda to wage lawfare on Syria'.
Why have upwards of 20 articles been produced attacking those of us who are questioning important aspects of UK propaganda operations? Several of these are by Dominic Kennedy (listed in Integrity Initiative documents) for the Times. off-guardian.org/2020/10/06/the…
The Times's first hit on the the Working Group - by Kennedy & colleagues - was the very morning US, UK and France were bombing Syria in response to the allegations of a chemical attack on Douma.
Three years on, distinguished and honourable public figures are expressing their deep concern at how the OPCW report on Douma was nobbled by those whose justification for the bombing is challenged by the truth.
1. 'The Syria FFMs operate under bureaucratic not scientific control. The Office of the Director General, which has neither technical nor scientific expertise, controls the investigative and reporting aspects of the FFMs and excludes scientific scrutiny and formal peer review'
2. The original interim report was secretly modified for publication in June 2018 & only stopped when discovered by a member of the Douma team. The modifications drew unsupported conclusions and censored issues about chemistry, toxicology, ballistics and witness testimony.
8 hospitalised from a vessel with accommodation for 234.
We obviously need more information to know what happened in this particular case. But that's also so more generally: we need to know what can go wrong. Here, people fit enough to be serving in the navy have been affected.
Strange! Looking for more information about the Australian sailors hospitalised after covid jab, I found a link to an article in the Daily Mail. But the article had already disappeared.