Two comments. 1) Not everyone can or should fight every fight all the time. And telling people to care about what you care about, not what they care most about, is harmful to activism.
2) My main concern about climate activism has long been how it increasingly resembles an ideological (or religious) belief that justifies every sacrifice in the present for a bright and glorious future. It's familiar.
I'm not a climate change skeptic. It's a huge issue requiring focus & resources. I'm a skeptic of those who would, for example, make worthless green deals with totalitarian regimes to distort the past and ruin the present in order to save the future.
Change takes energy. We are not going to solve the climate problem, or any problem, by reducing our energy investment, but by increasing it to spur innovation & prosperity. Demanding billions, mostly poor, suffer for the rich world's sins is obscene and won't even work.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garry Kasparov

Garry Kasparov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kasparov63

14 Oct
A conceptual problem with the West's dealings with Putin for 20 years now is they assume there's ideology and strategy, when it's boring-but-effective money and chaos and corruption.
US media and pundits had a similar problem with Trump. Demagoguery doesn't have to be sophisticated or novel to work. If you control enough of the environment, you can win, or at least inflict huge damage.
Control can come from a populist's appeal on mass and social media or from a dictator's riot police. It can be billions flowing into Western institutions to weaken and corrupt them. It's not complicated. It's propaganda. It's mafia.
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
Honoring great deeds and risk-takers who defy conventional wisdom can inspire others to follow in their footsteps, be it into uncharted waters or outer space, and we sorely need such daring today. My op-ed on why I celebrate Columbus Day: wsj.com/articles/colum…
"This caricature of Columbus as little more than a rapacious villain is as simplistic and wrongheaded as the version of him as a savior-hero who proved the world was round." History is not a zero-sum game.
"We must teach the good and the bad of our leaders, our founders, our heroes and saints. Otherwise, myths take hold too easily, such as the Confederate “Lost Cause,” left to fester like an open wound."
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
As the UN General Assembly begins, read @EnesKanter and me in the @NYDailyNews on how it has become a platform for dictators, unfit to be hosted and funded by the United States. nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-ope…
"Lacking any legitimacy from fair elections at home, dictators are always eager to appear on international stages and summits, especially in the U.S."
Authoritarian regimes are aggressively infiltrating international institutions, from Russia's abuse of Interpol–whose Congress is being hosted by Erdogan's Turkey this year–to China's deadly manipulation of the World Health Organization.
Read 4 tweets
2 Sep
Calling people "alarmist" is usually just a way of trying to discredit them, demonstrated by the fact that it goes on even after they've been proven correct.
When they cannot answer your arguments or refute the facts, they attack your tone and tactics. But that's not what they really want. They want you to stop, to shut up, to be ignored.
If you weren't right, they wouldn't care. When I joined others in Russia in 2005 to warn that Putin was creating a dictatorship, I was called hysterical, alarmist, etc. Instead of stopping as it all came true, the attacks continued.
Read 6 tweets
1 Sep
Pres. Biden's speech about leaving Afghanistan and nation-building was at least consistent until he said "human rights will be the center of our foreign policy." How, when the bad guys use force and don't care about your diplomacy?
Non-military action is vital to promote human rights, and can be very effective. Economic tools and cultural norms are essential. But when the enemies of the free world realize you've taken force off the table, you have 15 years of democracy in retreat.
When Assad's regime was crumbling, Putin sent fighter jets to support him. Obama sent John Kerry. Ukraine, Venezuela, Hong Kong, Belarus, Afghanistan—they use force when they know the free world will not even agree on sanctions.
Read 10 tweets
8 Aug
A tragedy and a shame. Many will be slaughtered and millions will be cast back into the Taliban dark ages. And it shows America is a untrustworthy ally, in contrast with dictators like Putin who show loyalty to their vile peers and allies. npr.org/2021/08/08/102…
I supported Biden over Trump without reservations in 2020. He had the chance to set America back on the path of standing for good, for the values of its founding. Instead, he is charting a course for the most defeatist and defeated US foreign policy in memory.
We saw in Obama the failure of trying to be friends with everyone. We saw in Trump a transactional, valueless president who used foreign policy for personal gain. If America is to mean anything more than cliches about freedom, it must show it in its actions.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(