#SeditionHunters have worked for months to understand the order & organization under the seeming chaos of the Capitol attack. New analysis suggests: U.S. democracy hung by a thread for critical minutes. And we owe an immense debt to the men and women who fought to preserve it. 1/
New public resources include detailed timelines of the Jan 6 attack, backed up by hours of synchronized video; and a heartbreaking study of the fight for the “tunnel” door, & one of its heroes, by Emmy-award winning director Consuelo Gonzalez. Watch it. 2/
To understand why the tunnel was so important, pull back & consider patterns on Jan 6. Beneath the chaos are ordered motions, directed by people with bullhorns. The seeming plan: to hit multiple entries at once, flood the building, & block police reinforcements. But it failed. 3/
The plan faltered on the W. Plaza when police resistance bought crucial time - but a series of coordinated attacks broke successive police lines on both E & W sides. By 2:41 PM, invaders were pouring into the Capitol from 4 breaches and walking into the basement-level tunnel. 4/
Imagine had this succeeded: the Capitol mobbed, lawmakers hiding, police unable to reach them from inside (access tunnels blocked) or outside (surrounded by 1000s of ‘protestors’). It took swift coordinated action to position crowds just right - watch. 5/
But MPD commanders had chosen the tunnel to retreat into, and around 2:41 PM the call went out: “They’re not getting into this building”. Exhausted officers had fought on the Plaza for 1.5 hours, but they turned around, and they held the door. 6/
Watch for yourself in two new sync’d videos. The first, from @StevieG54099097, starts minutes after the initial breach of the East doors - then it was go time on the West. A rush broke through on the W Plaza and people surged up to the tunnel entrance. 7/
The second, from Consuelo Gonzalez (Mohair Media) starts 10 minutes after the mob hit the entrance - watch them regroup & organize surges and brutal attacks. By 3:19 PM, police had pushed back, but Officer Fanone was dragged out into the mob. 8/
What you don’t see here is what happened inside the building. While police fought in the tunnel, new reinforcements materialized inside: MPD, SWAT teams, who came up from below unimpeded. By 3:21, Fanone is unconscious, but police are gaining upstairs. 9/
The re-establishment of control is clear in new video released by the DOJ: quietly, and unseen from the outside, law enforcement had moved in and re-taken the Rotunda by 3:27 PM. While battles outside raged for another 1.5 hours, the momentum had turned. (h/t @JordanOnRecord) /10
How did this all play out, and why did people keep fighting afterwards? You can read the full timeline yourself at links below, and watch video - every individual event has a link to supporting video evidence. Here is the timeline in table form... 11/ docs.google.com/document/d/1jx…
And here is the timeline as a detailed source list. The new HBO documentary (released Oct. 20) is called “Days of Rage”. But the timeline implies that not everyone was raging. Someone had been building that rage, and was planning to use it. 12/ docs.google.com/document/d/1yM…
The timeline here is made possible by 9 months of work by volunteers in the #SeditionHunters community, mapping, timing, and synchronizing video. We organized it to help people understand, with links to primary-source evidence, so everyone can watch and judge for themselves. 13/
The @January6thCmte's work and FBI arrests will continue to focus attention on those responsible for the Capitol attack. We will keep working as well. To follow along, here’s a list of resources - you can see what has been done, what is left to do. 14/ docs.google.com/document/d/1zB…
Correction - the HBO documentary is "Four Hours at the Capitol". It's the NYT visual piece that is "Day of Rage". HBO includes extensive interviews with J6 figures; brace for a "Who Shot Ashli Babbitt" T-shirt. 15/ nytimes.com/video/us/polit…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, the NYT is shameful for sourcing an anti-Mamdani article from notorious white supremacist Jordan Lasker. But it's worse. Lasker, who they call an "academic", is a student whose only paper of note is INFAMOUS for unethical data use that got his tenured co-author fired. 1/
Who is the NYT's "academic" source? Lasker is or was a PhD student at Texas Tech, but his only paper of note is earlier, from 2019: "Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability", whose misuse of data triggered a major investigation and got Cleveland State Prof. Bryan Pesta fired. 2/
The Chronicle of Higher Ed wrote about the scandal. It wasn't just that the article was "racist pseudoscience". It was that the authors misused data from the NIH and lied on their data application - filed by Bryan Pesta. A flagrant ethics violation. 3/ archive.is/KwbGy
Reminder: Elon Musk, whose Starship just blew up on the test stand (with its extra fuel tanks nearby), was allowed for THIRTY YEARS to lie about his training in science. He started lying in 1995, kept lying - and suffered no consequences. But physics itself has consequences. 1/
Just listen to the man's nonsense about how he is shaped by physics and consider: the press allowed him to bullshit like this for 30 YEARS. Of course he got convinced he can just make up his own reality. If anyone died in the Starship explosion tonight, blame the press too. 2/
In 2022 I did a 69-Tweet thread on Elon's fake AstroBoy Genius image, hoping to ward off what was coming: Elon helping to overthrow democracy. What you saw on the launchpad tonight, that's what he's doing now to US science, to our country: exploding it. 3/
Sure, it's funny that Fox News is now using "86" in talking about a fired reporter, when less than a month ago they demanded the FBI investigate "86" as a death threat. But the joke is on us. Performative outrage over bullshit is a test of YOU, to see if you'll accept it. 1/
You can't criticize Fox's words as hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is when someone committed to the truth is inconsistent. Fox and others are post-truth: they're just making noises to see if they can get you to react. They're gaming you. 2/
All of us have a psychological need for rationality. We need to feel that words have meaning, that people mean what they say. We do understand that people lie: a lie is a meaningful but false statement, to deceive. But what Fox is doing here is worse, and harder to cope with. 3/
ABC's explanation of why they suspended correspondent Terry Moran misuses the word "objective". Moran said Stephen Miller was a "world-class hater" and "his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment". Those are objectively true statements. Miller's hatred is deeply documented. 1/
Moran ascribed to Miller an emotion: "hatred". A decade of reporting has documented, objectively, that Miller hates. In 2018, LA Mag interviewed his high school classmates and reported their stories of how Miller hated minorities. "Hate" is their word. 2/ lamag.com/politics/steph…
Terry Moran also said that for Stephen Miller, "hatred is his spiritual nourishment". That's colorful language, but also documented. Here's a high school classmate of Miller's with a story of Miller saying awful, provocative things to immigrants: "he wanted to be hated". 3/
Reminder: Trump has tried this before. It's part of his dream of control, to send in the National Guard against the will of a state or mayor. On May 29, 2020, he Tweeted the threat: "Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts.." 1/
Trump has also overtly sought a Secretary of Defense willing to order the National Guard to shoot at protestors. In 2020 he fired Mark Esper and put in Chris Miller for that reason. Pete Hegseth may face a terrible test now. 2/
On Jan 6, the National Guard arrived late likely because sane heads in the Pentagon delayed them til local police had regained control, out of fear of what Trump might order. There are fewer sane heads now. Hegseth is already failing his test. 3/
Howard Lutnick, our Sec. of Commerce, shows a disconnect from material reality that will make Americans die. A weather forecast cannot be "automated" or MADE AT ALL without data. And Trump is cutting the satellites and weather stations that provide that data. 1/
Lutnick, who is in charge of NOAA and its National Weather Service, seem to think that if you say "web" and "cloud" and "computer" and "AI" then by some magic knowledge appears. But weather forecasts depend on MEASUREMENTS. Which Lutnick is cutting. 2/ kcci.com/article/propos…
The proposed NOAA budget cuts both current satellite operations and planned future satellites meant to make better predictions. Lutnick's testimony suggests: people have forgotten that not everything is a simulation, that reality exists (and bites). 3/ spacenews.com/omb-suggests-n…