While the FabIndia ad has been reduced to a bindi & Urdu debate, I think a core issue is that, like many enterprises that start with a social purpose, after a point they lose mission focus & growth is dictated purely by commerce. So the identity begins to shift.. 1/4
The perceived identity of an ‘Indian brand’, built on the shoulders of small scale artisans and producers across India, a brand that was set up to give a platform to native Indian art, artists, weavers, design and fabric - and taking all that to the world 2/4
Over time, FabIndia has become a unidimensional apparel giant, one of many, but lost its roots, its quality, its perceived connect to small scale producers, eventually giving in to biz pressures & profits. Its this focus shift we see in the ad, made for their target customer 3/4
Would be interesting to compare the branding and communication done by @Amul_Coop and @FabindiaNews for example. Both Social Enterprises, both based on a co-op model. While Amul keeps mission focus and grows with that at the center, FabIndia is just another apparel brand now. 4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Historic decisions for the #agri sector with the ordinances announced by the Union Govt, creating a progressive path forward for India's farmers, intermediaries & agri-entrepreneurs. My take on the impact in simple terms, from a farmer/ agri-entrepreneur lens...
1/n Previously, farmers with marketable surplus could only sell to Licensed buyers such as State & private mandis, APMC licenced cold storages/ warehouses/ Companies. But these buyers could sell to anyone! A very skewed market, right!? Farmer lost earning, Trader gained margins!
2/n Further, with the Essential Commodities Act (ECA) Govt had the right to impose price or stock control on commodities or ban exports at any time. This created intense volatility & trust deficit. No entrepreneur small or large wanted to venture into this unpredictable quagmire.