"You are committing crimes against humanity" is among many featured that make this an organised sustained campaign of intimidation and threat, and malicious communication. Have the govt & police said how they are responding to this?
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1450893104890908683
Would welcome info on whether this is criminal & whether police are treating it as such.
Clearly radicalising of those issuing proceedings
Do those in receipt of such letters have a claim for libel too? Would support to bring a handful of cases have any impact on this network?
Clearly radicalising of those issuing proceedings
Do those in receipt of such letters have a claim for libel too? Would support to bring a handful of cases have any impact on this network?
Obviously crazy content. Esp role of the Pope. But "serving" fantasy legal notices with righteous anger against NHS, school "crimes against humanity" clearly radicalises. Reduces inhibitions to create warped moral framework to legitimise violence once "legal" notices are ignored.
This is an archetype of "socialisation towards violence" (not just among those carting a gallows around). Prevent should be involved where they can be (though these individuals may be likely to refuse participation).
Pre-pandemic, growing number vulnerable to radicalisation, with an unclear/mixed ideology & attraction to extreme events and violence. Angriest fringe of a fringe (doing personal targeted actions) of anti-vax/lockdown movements mix that with a new 'cause'
opendemocracy.net/en/countering-…
opendemocracy.net/en/countering-…
Can clearly see here the socialisation towards violence in these responses, after the same person posted footage of issuing a bogus legal notice at family home of the well known journalist. These messages contain unlawful explicit threats & intimidation
https://twitter.com/theJeremyVine/status/1447179962503606279?t=QTq71qgxn95O9He2Qc7kFQ&s=19
Key distinction is between
* right to protest vaccines, masks, or Covid itself (however weak the case being made)
Vs
* personal targeted actions (with threat/intimidation)
This bogus claim to be "serving" legal notices is a form of intimidation; a threat of future consequences.
* right to protest vaccines, masks, or Covid itself (however weak the case being made)
Vs
* personal targeted actions (with threat/intimidation)
This bogus claim to be "serving" legal notices is a form of intimidation; a threat of future consequences.
Some interesting thoughts on the law here. The third strand links to my concern about the delusion about issuing legal documents
https://twitter.com/LevinsLaw/status/1451204239473139718?t=R5zuj2-amylCuwQoTizs1w&s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
