After a week-long whirlwind trial, closing arguments in the case of Lev Parnas and Andrey Kukushkin are about to begin.

Follow along here.

Background from opening statements, @lawcrimenews lawandcrime.com/high-profile/t…
Assistant U.S. Attorney Hagan Cordell Scotten will be delivering summations for the government for an estimated 1 hour and 20 minutes.

Then Parnas's attorney Joseph Bondy is up for less than that.

Kukushkin's lawyer Gerry Lefcourt will be roughly an hour.
AUSA Scotten lays out the conspiracy count for jurors:

"It's clear as day that there was an agreement here."
Scotten on the Russian tycoon whose money Parnas and Kukushkin allegedly funneled: "Andrey Muraviev is the financial resource. He was paying the bills."
Scotten: "It's clear why they're doing this—to get the licenses they need for their cannabis business."
To accomplish this, Scotten says, they needed political support and turned to the people they believed would be Nevada's next governor and AG: Adam Laxalt and Wes Duncan, respectively.

ICYMI: Laxalt's testimony lawandcrime.com/high-profile/n…
Scotten: "This is exactly what straw donations look like."

The prosecutor notes that Muraviev's name is not on any of the forms.

If they thought the donations were legal, why not just put his name on the forms, Scotten asks.
Scotten: "The whole point of a contribution is that a politician likes you."
Scotten says jurors know the defendants "acted willfully" because they read the news about their crimes while they were committing them.

"Parnas's crimes were so notorious that they made the news," and Kukushkin shared that news with Muraviev, he says.
Scotten notes that neither defendant ever voted.

They"acting like diehard partisans," but they "couldn't care less about politics," he notes.
Scotten: "Make no mistake: The purpose behind this conspiracy was influence-buying."
Scotten says that Muraviev had a picture of someone "mooning the Statue of Liberty" as his WhatsApp avatar, and this is whom Kukushkin chose to associate with.
Side note:

Throughout these summations, the prosecutor refers to communications submitted into evidence.

That evidence is typically made public during trial but it has not been released to date by the U.S. Attorney's office for SDNY, so far as I'm aware.
Scotten claims that Parnas made false statements about his company Global Energy Producers in an affidavit:

"If you think what you're doing is legal, you can be honest about it."
Scotten tackles defense argument that only a small portion of the $1 million from Muraviev was allegedly funneled into U.S. elections.

"It’s true he [Muraviev] only got about $150,000 worth of crime, but that’s still a whole lot of crime," the prosecutor said.
Government summation concludes.

10 minute recess.

Bondy up next for Parnas.
Service advisory: I'm going to be pivoting to a pre-trial hearing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case around noon, and my colleague @MarisaRSarnoff will take over on a double-byline story to come.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

21 Oct
A pre-trial hearing sorting out how much secrecy or transparency will greet jury selection in next month's highly anticipated trial of Ghislaine Maxwell is about to begin.

I'll be covering the proceedings for @LawCrimeNews.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz for the government.

Maxwell’s attorney Bobbi Sternheim speaks for the defense.

As for the defendant: “This is Ms. Maxwell, and I am on the line.”
Note:

In addition to RCFP and the 17 news organizations opposing sealing of the jury questionnaire and voir dire, so has the SDNY in-house press. (Full disclosure: I co-signed that letter to the judge—organized by Law360's @PeteBrush— opposing the sealing.)
Read 12 tweets
20 Oct
Lev Parnas will NOT be testifying at his trial, his lawyer Joseph Bondy just told a judge.
Andrey Kukushkin also will not be testifying, he says.
After Bondy discloses that the defense will rest today, Judge Oetken says he will give jurors a free day today.
Read 4 tweets
19 Oct
The @January6thCmte's business meeting to vote on a contempt report for Steve Bannon is about to begin.

Follow along with me in this thread.

Background here, @lawcrimenews lawandcrime.com/high-profile/j…
You can watch the proceedings here on YouTube.
Chairman @BennieGThompson:

"Let me start by saying that it gives me no joy that I've been forced to call this meeting."
Read 10 tweets
19 Oct
The defense case begins in the Lev Parnas trial.

Parnas's attorney Joseph Bondy calls Joseph Ahearn, a director of the pro-Trump super PAC America First Action.

Seen below: Texts between Parnas and Ahearn released by the House Intel Committee during Trump's first impeachment.
Bondy asks whether there would be any questions that would cause Ahearn to invoke the Fifth Amendment.

"Potentially," Ahearn replies.

Read more of the Parnas and Ahearn messages here: judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
Judge Oetken says that's enough to have him sign an immunity order.

The judge then calls out the jury.
Read 26 tweets
19 Oct
Arraignment is about to begin for a U.S. Capitol police officer charged with obstruction for allegedly advising a Jan. 6 rioter to scrub his social media trail.

I'll be covering the proceedings for @LawCrimeNews.

Background from last week below:

lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-br…
Through his attorney, Michael A. Riley enters pleas of not guilty to two counts of obstruction.
Prosecutors anticipate that discovery in this case will be complete this week.
Read 5 tweets
13 Oct
Good morning from New York.

The trial of Lev Parnas and Andrey Kukushkin is about to begin here in Manhattan Federal Court.

Before opening statements were slated to begin, Judge Oetken said a juror disclosed a possible scheduling issue.

Background: lawandcrime.com/high-profile/e…
The judge excused the juror. There are now two alternates.

Openings anticipated in roughly 10 minutes after the judge initially instructs the panel.
AUSA Aline R Flodr begins by noting that a "Russian tycoon" wired $1 million before the 2018 elections.

"The law requires that political contributions be made in the true donor's name."

"Here, the defendants hid where that money came from."
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(