But first, what is a corporation, anyway? Put simply, it's a legal abstraction allowing many people, with a defined relationship between them, to appear as one, in the eyes of the law (and other humans). Perhaps a better way to think of it is as a "composite person".
However, as always, the devil is in the details. The character of that composition is what ultimately gives rise to corporatism, the reduction to the lowest-common-denominator.
Why do corporations tend to reduce themselves to the lowest common denominator? 🧵
The book "Loonshots" refers to the idea of "return on politics": Companies should try to make sure that it's more advantageous for one's career to make actual contributions than to be engaged in internal marketing of one's work and angling to get promoted and/or amass more power.
Likewise, @BretWeinstein and @HeatherEHeying refer to the problem of administrators in universities: those who are willing to bear "networking", woriking in committees, and implementing policies, are those who get to control the future, overriding those who focus on their work.
Whoever claims that the American and Australian experiences are so divergent as to not be intelligible is either lost or pulling a fast one (or both). Within the breadth and depth of possible human cultures, these two are so similar that they're hard to even distinguish.
Biden is going to war with Tesla to help out UAW. 🧵
Why is Sandy Munro, a 50+ year veteran of Detroit, who's worked on everything from ATVs to pickup trucks to fighter jets, pissed off about the appointment of @missy_cummings as NHTSA advisor?
1. Tesla gets its cobalt from Canada, known hotbed of slavery 2. But cobalt is fungible, so their batteries use as little as possible, and their new ones don't use any of it (see LFP) 3. "Family wealth questionably obtained" is of course repeating the fake emerald mine BS. See: