1. Shining the Spotlight on Dr. Marion Koopmans

via @angoffinet and @uacjess

Principal Investigator

erasmusmc.nl/en/research/re…

"Erasmus MC is closely involved with EcoHealth Alliance"

erasmusmc.nl/en/research/de…

(under collaboration)

2. Don't forget to send that email to SAGO@who.int

with subject:

“Public comments on SAGO members” by 27 October 2021

4. Wuhan Lab Leak "Debunked"

De KNAW. (2020). KNAW-symposium: Het nieuwe coronavirus - Marion Koopmans [YouTube Video]. Retrieved from

Minute 14:00
5. You Tube Q and A

Dr Marion Koopmans on the WHO Investigation of the Origins of the Pandemic



"we found not a grain of evidence for a lab leak theory"

Minute: 2:10
6. PR for WIV

Marion Koopmans doing PR for WIV:

"It's It's certainly not a big big thing"

WHO team scientist: Wuhan lab workers did fall sick in autumn of 2019

nbcnews.com/nightly-news/v…

7. Insert And Backbone?

"we need to talk about the backbone too, not just the insert"



Unredacting Koopman's email may have been an error
8. "Ask Marion" Part 1

(English Translation) 11/06/2021 by @hommel_b

janbhommel.nl/ask-marion-1-e…
9. "Ask Marion" Part 2

(English Translation) 20/06/202 by @hommel_b

janbhommel.nl/ask-marion-2-e…

Archived: archive.ph/Gczf3
10. "Ask Marion" Part 3

(English Translation) 05/07/2021 by @Hommel_bee

Two names are missing under this Lancet letter, while one would expect them, Marion Koopmans and Ron Fouchier...

janbhommel.nl/ask-marion-3-e…

Archived: archive.ph/ajgMx
11. Why did Koopmans not sign the Lancet Letter?

On Feb 7, 2020, Daszak sent an email to Colwell with a list of people they want to approach to sign the statement, including Osterhaus, Koopmans and Haagmans. Haagmans signed it. Koopmans will not.

The question remains; why not?
12. "Ask Marion" Part 4

20/07/2021 by @Hommel_be

"Koopmans liked it all. Whether it was China’s repeated delay of the mission, the lack of raw data, China’s veto over the composition of the team Marion Koopmans did not speak a single word of criticism"

janbhommel.nl/ask-marion-4-t…
12. Gain of Function

"I strongly suspect that this successful Gain-of-function investigation by Ron Fouchier is the reason why Marion Koopmans and he did not sign the letter to The Lancet"
13. Funding
" For Koopmans and Fouchier too, if it were proven that the SARS-CoV-2 virus had escaped from the WIV, it would have disastrous consequences getting funds for Gain-of-function experiments with influenza viruses, just as it would have for Ralph Baric"
14. Funding (2)

Under "Research Projects"

erasmusmc.nl/en/research/re…

Anyone got a Calculator, or a little Dutch Abacus?
15. Erasmus MC, EcoHealth Alliance,Koopmans

Thick as Thieves, Virus Thieves!



@uacjess
16. Unroll Marion Koopmans @threadreaderapp

and send that email to SAGO@who.int

with subject:

“Public comments on SAGO members” by 27 October 2021

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓

Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BillyBostickson

Nov 6
🧵1. In the interview with @danaparish

Redfield stresses that the evidence points to lab creation for a reusable, aerosolized vaccine vector, with US complicity in funding/tech.

He says he is fed up with the cover-ups and predicts that full intel release would confirm this.
🧵2. Proof?

Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements

(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)

He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.

He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
Read 21 tweets
Oct 30
🧵1. Critique of preprint: SARS-COV-2 like FCS hype

Media article 1

dailymail.co.uk/health/article…

Media article 2

straitstimes.com/world/coronavi…
🧵2. The Authors State:

"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."

biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
🧵3. Two fatal flaws: Overreach & Undermine

A. The authors of this study on the BRZ batCoV from Brazil unfortunately overreach themselves when they connect it to SARS-CoV-2 origins.

B. The FCS evidence actually undermines the flawed hypothesis of direct bat to human emergence!
Read 13 tweets
Oct 25
🧵1. Honest question

Did you try to read my pangolin coronavirus report but gave up because it was too long or too complex?

If you didn't see it, link is in next tweet

Help is at hand!

Thanks to Google's pretty amazing "notebook lm"

A video explainer

notebooklm.google.com/notebook/1b843…
🧵2. Just in case..

The massive report is here:

researchgate.net/publication/39…
🧵3. An updated brief explanation on Medium

The Pangolin-Mediated Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2

medium.com/p/the-pangolin…
Read 8 tweets
Oct 4
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"

usrtk.org/wp-content/upl…
2. Hypothetical Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2

Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)

page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:

Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site
Read 15 tweets
Sep 11
1. "We’ll be seen as spies, not scientists.”

x.com/emilyakopp/sta…

Daszak "seems" confused when questioned BY @RepJamesComer whether he ever worked with, or for, spooks.

Unsurprisingly in light of what is shown on page 79 of the DRASTIC EHA files

researchgate.net/publication/39… x.com/Dylan_Housman/…Image
2. He may claim it was post pandemic contact

But thanks to @AGHuff we know it went back quite a while, at least to 2015.

@AGHuff 3. More questions from @NameIsSpartacus

We need to find out why Peter Daszak & EcoHealth had In-Q-Tel backing and why Nathan Wolfe (an obvious intelligence asset with links to Epstein/Maxwell, Boris Nikolic, and Bill Gates) was on their editorial board.

Read 14 tweets
Sep 10
Good to see Generation Z in Asia growing a set of balls and fighting back against shit governments.



#NepalGenZProtest #Myanmar #SriLanka

Hopefully #China will be next!
Just 3 years ago #SrilankaProtest

One year ago #BangladeshProtest

Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(