As promised, we continue the @AFI_WG's policy primer series with a primer on #fieldwork 🌍📝🌏. Authored by @BeBedeGe, @HeathershawJ & @ilyas_saliba, it suggests a list of institutional measures which support the fieldwork approval process and enable good practice and safety. 1/
⚠️⚠️After a number of recent high-profile incidents of researchers suffering harassment, arrest, detention and even death while on fieldwork, increased attention has rightly been given to protecting UK-affiliated staff and doctoral researchers when conducting research abroad. 2/
While the risks are real, the challenge for 🇬🇧universities is much broader than protecting their researchers. The question is then how to safeguard their staff while at the same time enable them to engage in quality fieldwork under difficult circumstances. 3/
Part of the difficulty lies in the fact that fieldwork contexts (incl. digital fieldwork) are so diverse that they defy generic assessment. Travel advisories, political risk databases & standardised ethical procedures can be poor instruments at capturing actual fieldwork risk. 4/
👉👉An approach which is standard and universal may appear appropriate to governing bodies, but may not be properly responsible, and can lead to mistrust or frustration, rather than enable researchers engaged in fieldwork abroad. 5/
👉👉A university’s approach to fieldwork support should be based on and tailored to the specific risk in each case rather than command-and-control. That puts into practice #AcademicFreedom and also allows researchers to take a more active role in the research ethics process. 6/
🎯What does this look like in practice?🎯
Let's start with a couple of broader institutional measures which can help to assess whether and under what conditions to approve #fieldwork: first, ethics committees should seek external advice regarding high-risk projects. 7/
Second, risk assessment procedures for travel should be light-touch and fully integrated with ethics processes. 8/
Third, supervisors of student and early-career researchers should take professional responsibility for preparing and supporting student and staff fieldwork. 9/
And more specifically, researchers should be encouraged to create support pairs or networks for their fieldwork beyond their immediate colleagues and institutions. 10/
Enhanced travel insurance should be made available. 11/
And just as universities have budgets for Open Access to research findings, they should also allocate specific budgets to support open fieldwork, as well as set aside funds for laptops, phones, tablets and security software and support services. 12/
Finally, for student and early-career researchers, pre-departure training courses and interdisciplinary fieldwork colloquia, focusing on soft skills and the practice of research should be resourced. 13/
You can access the full policy primer on Enabling #fieldwork in Difficult Environments via the @AFI_WG website: bit.ly/3jrAN12 / end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"We are writing to express solidarity with all our persecuted colleagues... and calling on the Chinese government to revoke these unjustified sanctions and to accept that scholarship on China, like scholarship on any country, entails scrutiny of its policies, goals and actions.
We also pledge to continue to be inclusive in our own work and engage with all academic views, including those the Chinese government is trying to marginalise. We request our universities and research institutions to demonstrate their unconditional commitment to academic freedom,
1/ @UUKIntl released a report today on security guidelines for universities and featured in Times @CharlieHParker. It needs consideration and we are happy to debate it with them at their conference on 11-12 Nov. However, here are some initial thoughts.
2/ We are happy that the reports cites our work as well as that of @Sar@GPPi among others - alas not @ucu. It also adopts our definition of academic freedom and highlights the values of codes of conduct to protect academic from. However, we have a number of concerns.
3/ The report makes some positive references to "values" and academic freedom. But it fails to recognise that the values of UK universities are universal, and the institutions are inherently international not just affected by “internationalisation”.