Tragedy on the set of Rust reminds me of the decades old story of Jon-Erik Hexum, young rising star actor who as a joke put a prop gun to his head on set and fired the trigger not realizing that a "blank" if it's fired in direct contact with your head has a forceful enough ...
2/ discharge to kill you if you put it to your temple. He died. Young handsome guy in his 20s. This was like in the mid-80s. I've been wanting to ask: has there been any reporting of what set of facts possibly led to Baldwin fatally injuring one person and seriously injuring ...
3/ another? Were live bullets in the prop gun? I honestly don't know if that's possible. If it is what makes it different from a gun? why not just use a gun with blanks? This isn't a leading question: are there any details on this?
Okay there you go. Propmaster on set wasn't union but local hire and somehow or another (presumably just tragic/negligent accident) live rounds were in the gun rather than blanks.
2/ hollywood producer pal of mine tells me that having any actual gun even w blanks on set these days is pretty uncommon since it's so easy to recreate the sound and visual in post-production. blanks and a real gun these days tends to be on low budget productions.
3/ ADDENDA: My note above is incomplete. The Propmaster on the Rust set wasn't a member of Local 44 but we don't know if that person might have been a member of Local 480, which covers New Mexico. That can't be ruled out.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshtpm

22 Oct
Many more details in this LAT piece. Many of which are terrifying to hear if you're anyone with liability for what was happening on this set. But the description of events sounds somewhat different here. latimes.com/entertainment-…
2/ As a non-movie person I'd been assuming this was during the filming of a scene. But the reference here to an accidental discharge seems less a matter of an accidental firing of a real bullet than the gun firing between scenes. This cld perhaps explain why the DP & Director ...
3/ were near enough to the weapon to both be injured from a single firing of the weapon.
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
Few more points on this. I know everyone is dunking on him. But I feel profound sympathy for Baldwin. This is an unimaginable nightmare. But piecing together the various facts I discuss in the thread below it appears that this was a bit of a DIY, low budget production set.
2/ Says here there was no union propmaster/armorer involved. Just a local hire. Curious what movie people say about this. But I don't think this is like you had some non-union construction guys building your house. My impression is that all the people who are prop/armorers ...
3/ in movie work are union. So saying the folks doing that weren't union sounds like they didn't really have someone on set who does this professionally. As noted in the thread, producer friend of mine tells me that most major production sets don't use actual firearms anymore ...
Read 5 tweets
20 Oct
obviously she’s not the only one supporting these things. but all of them together really is basically the economic agenda of dc lobbyists, private equity and VC world. It’s what you come up with if you give each lobbyists a shopping list to fill out at donor events
like again, it’s not that she’s unique precisely. but basically this is a list you come to only if you have no policy views and you have the donors text their asks while your on the phone to the White House. She doesn’t even go through the motions
3/ I mean, carried interest. Lol. According to IRS regs you’re not even allowed to know what carried interest means unless you make more than $2m a year in taxable income.
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
So the idea is that Facebook essentially wants to distance itself from … well, Facebook. The company will be named Zuckplex let’s say and then it has a range of products of which Facebook is just is one. It has the feel of a mobster trying to move assets into legit enterprises.
2/Or simply one of many companies that began as makers of something obscure or tawdry and then tried to moonwalk their way into something classy and respectable. For some reason I’m reminded of Banana Republic’s transition from kitsch safari gear brand to midrange clothing brand.
3/ Not really the same thing but somehow seems related. Google obviously did this. So there’s precedent. But two big issues stand out. The first is that Google was already far more diversified than search by the time of the alphabet rebrand. Maps, gmail, self-driving cars …
Read 13 tweets
13 Oct
Have been thinking about this. Demoralization among Dems - driven overwhelmingly by dawdling on Capitol Hill, maybe secondarily by slow motion investigations - is endangering the outcome in the Virginia Gov's race.
2/ There is a big and dangerous disconnect. It's hard to see any sense that there is any sense of urgency in DC about bringing this legislative round to a close. It's actually very urgent. Everyone with a vote who is negotiating in the press (which includes almost everyone) ...
3/ desperately needs to STFU. Get in a room get to where this ends up. Pass the legislation and move on. Obviously everyone is angling for their desired outcome. And that's totally understandable. But they're arguing over how to do the house renovation while the house is ...
Read 5 tweets
10 Oct
what's weird abt this is that, if i'm reading the details right, it suggests sharing with an ideological and nationalistic motive rather than cash which has been the standard motive in recent decades.
2/ reading the piece again it suggests that foreign country ratted the couple out. Says the guy send docs to foreign country and that those docs were then forwarded to an FBI official. FBI then set up a sting. Makes it sound like the foreign country didn't want to play ...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(