Please send your feedback to SAGO@who.int before the 27th Oct.
When it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck - it must be a duck.
So personally I will be asking for some ducks to be removed and replaced with independent experts in biosafety and biosecurity.
'What else would you do? [--] Apart from - you know - an audit: open the book, open the freezer, show everything which is an inspection - that is a very different mechanism.
***I have my doubts that this would yield anything new.***’
First group listed on the Erasmus Viroscience “Collaborators” webpage is EcoHealth Alliance.
She has been constantly praising the safety of Chinese labs, implying that such an accident is impossible:
Which show how blind she is, as Chinese experts themselves have decried the structural biosafety issues in their labs: lack of qualified people, lack of funding (sometime no maintenance budget!), poor processes, lack of supervision, etc.
Yuan Zhiming of the WIV (Oct 2019):
Yang Zhanqiu of Wuhan University (Feb 2020):
"Lab trash can contain man-made viruses, bacteria or microbes with a potentially deadly impact [--].
Some researchers discharge laboratory materials into the sewer after experiments without a specific biological disposal mechanism”
‘Notice on Strengthening the Biosafety Management of Pathogenic Microorganism Laboratories’ (9th Feb 2020)
"some ‘problems and risks’ still remain"
then it list many shortcomings, including unauthorised lab activities, improper storage and disposal, etc: bit.ly/2XHKUas
Duck #3: Supaporn Wacharapluesadee ('Chu').
Supaporn has been extremely close to Pater Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance since she was picked up by Callahan as the main DARPA asset in Thailand as early as 2004. siliconicarus.org/2020/07/31/dar…
Since then she has worked very closely with Peter Daszak, Olival & Epstein of EHA - showing herself as a very reliable anchor for their work in Thailand - funded via DARPA and NIH.
She also did the bat guano epiphany paper of 2013 with Olival and Epstein from EcoHealth Alliance - a few months after the Mojiang’s workers deaths, using old DARPA samples and DARPA PREDICT funding, and never mentioning Mojiang.
And she was back with Linfa Wang (who never disclosed DEFUSE) in a Nature paper about bat and pangolin BatCoVs similar to SARS-CoV-2 in Feb 2021, just when the WHO team was in Wuhan. nature.com/articles/s4146…
Fortuitous timing.
(Unfortunately the pangolins have been debunked)
Anyway that is my list of top ducks.
Please check the SAGO list, reach your own conclusions, and send your feedback to SAGO@who.int before the 27th Oct.
And please ask for more biosafety and biosecurity experts to be included. who.int/news-room/arti…
"Nothing goes right all the time. So it is in research labs. Despite sophisticated safety installations and strict rules in virology labs accidents and leaks happen. Indeed, they are underreported."
"The virologists doing this work said it would help them predict the next pandemic virus. Armed with this insight, they claimed it would be possible to develop preventive vaccines and drugs that could be frozen and stored."
"African diplomats are becoming exasperated by China's demands for diplomatic support on every issue from Covid-19's origins to the human rights of the Uighurs in Xinjiang province,.."
"..whether it's in the World Health Organization, the UN Human Rights Council, diplomatic sources told Africa Confidential."
"Chinese diplomats email, text and call their African counterparts directly to get them to sign joint letters, support motions and other measures.."
“Withholding data from the government agency that funds your work with taxpayer dollars does not engender trust. Federal research grants are not an entitlement." plus.cq.com/shareExternal/…
"Failing to comply with oversight measures put into place largely for safety reasons is inexcusable. I’m not going to sit idly by while [EHA] inaction allows unqualified grifters and opportunists free reign to disparage my entire profession, ultimately making everyone less safe"
Jaime Yassif (@JaimeYassif), senior fellow for global biological policy and programs:
"I would have flagged this project.
Looking at the experiment of concern that's highlighted in the letter, it appears to me as gain-of-function research, even before the 'one log' requirement."
If you check the research directions over the last few years, in Wuhan (WIV, WIBP), Beijing and in collaboration with the US (inc. Baric's lab), vaccines and antiviral therapies (such as mABs) against MERS and SARS-type viruses were all the rage.
From there, being surprised that Chinese scientists could have changed the receptor binding site on MERS is just like being surprised that trucks are travelling down a motorway that has just been built.
The whole CTR (Cooperative Threat Reduction) philosophy of Callahan was to use cooperation at the scientists level, where cooperation at government level was elusive.
Callahan started the Prophecy program at DARPA (he was their portfolio manager from 2002 to 2012).
The CTR strategy (renamed BEP) was rolled out to DURC research in Asia.
For instance he picked up Supaporn and funded most of her research with EcoHealth Alliance in Thailand (BAA grants).
Funds went to Laos too via the Naval Medical Research Centre Asia. bepstate.net/about-us/
The same strategy was effectively applied to China, especially after they started working on their P4 with France (against better advice from the US).
In China the NIH stepped in with its R01 grants to EHA.
You had a good time calling the research-related hypothesis 'Debunked' at the KNAW-symposium in Dec 20.
Alongside meteorite (!), snakes and some other flotsam.
You had been working for a while with your the Chinese side of the WHO-Team (remote work started around Oct-Nov 20) and you were already pretty clear on your convictions.
You made the same claims in June 21, adding that there was no point going further:
You were also very dismissive of any criticism, and fully in line on this with a now very compromised Peter Daszak, who at the time was hiding DEFUSE: