#FridayPhysicsFun - @maartengm brought up cutting as a topic, and it is an interesting one. How do knives work? How sharp can you go? Is it the path to Royalty?
A knife is nearly a wedge. Wedges, one of the six simple machines, work (1) as a double incline, spreading out the splitting force over a long distance, and (2) by focusing the pushing force onto a thin edge. hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Mechanic…
The amplification of force, the mechanical advantage, is 1/tan(α) where α is the tip angle. Make α approach zero and very little force is needed to separate the target.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanica…
In a plastic material most force is used to deform the material, which pushes back. Work goes into deformation. In a brittle material cutting creates a fracture that may race ahead of the blade. The work done goes into the surface energy of the crack.
A knife also cuts by slicing, especially in soft materials where pushing just squishes them. This induces a shear force that can tear the material. Bread knifes and saws are serrated to boost this effect. physics.aps.org/articles/v5/139
journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/1…
Incidentally, this is why curved swords are effective: the shape guarantees more movement along the target when slicing (and a small initial strike region). Thicker blades can be stronger but are less sharp.
claireryanauthor.com/blog/2016/6/6/…
Scissors cut by exerting a lot of shear force on things caught between the blades, amplified by the lever design. Cheap scissors mostly use shear, while quality ones also have good blades.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scissors#…
One of my favourite slicers is the Knife-Edge Scanning Microscope (KESM) that uses a diamond edge to slice tissue while shining light through the edge to a sensor, acting as a simultaneous scanner. It can do 1 μm slices. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knife-edg…
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
The sharpest blade in use is ancient: obsidian, natural volcanic glass. Standard razor blades have edges 30-60 nm wide, while obsidian blades go down to 3 nm. edition.cnn.com/2015/04/02/hea…
In addition, their edges are smooth rather than jagged like steel. Steel is composed of small crystals, so when it fractures it will have a serrated pattern following the crystal joins. Obsidian is amorphous so when it cracks the crack just follows the lines of stress.
A smooth blade that is finer than a cell (and some macromolecules) makes for very effective cutting with less scarring. europepmc.org/article/med/84…
The problem is that obsidian is hard and brittle, so it easily fractures if there is any lateral stress. Not so good in surgery. Maybe desirable in a weapon. But the elasticity of metal scalpels makes them last much longer.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macuahuitl
Still, razors are dulled by human hair too. Apparently, the hair can trigger formation of microcracks (presumably between crystals) that lead to chipping.
news.mit.edu/2020/why-shavi…
science.org/doi/full/10.11…
The sharpest imagined blade is the monofiliament whip beloved by cyberpunk fiction: super-strong, a single molecule thick. (Gibson may have popularized it in the short story Johnny Mnemonic 1981, but Randall Garrett used it first, in 1963)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monomolec…
The problem is that it is too fine: a 0.4 nm wire cutting through a 4 nm cell membrane will push molecules apart but they will happily rejoin behind it. Especially since they move faster than the wire. I would not be surprised if collagen chains broke & rejoined after the wire.
It might locally cause dislocations in the crystal structure of metal, but as steel shows, imperfect metal is strong too. I suspect it would just push through, leaving the metal lattice to realign behind.
I think the sharpest cut would be from cosmic strings, hypothetical 1D topological defects in field theories. They would be about 1 fm across. scholarpedia.org/article/Cosmic… guava.physics.uiuc.edu/~nigel/courses…
Isn't that too thin to cut? Maybe not, since their enormous mass causes a deficit angle in spacetime: passing through an object it would either separate or push together matter by that angle. Especially negative mass strings would be awesome knives.
They would be almost as sharp as Aunt Maya's lack of sword in the epic webcomic Kill Six Billion Demons. killsixbilliondemons.com/comic/wielder-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anders Sandberg

Anders Sandberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anderssandberg

7 Oct
#FridayPhysicsFun – This year’s Nobel Prize in Physics went to Manabe, Hasselmann (climate) and Parisi. Media will focus on the climate stuff, because it is easy to explain. But what did Parisi do? And why does it matter for machine learning? nobelprize.org/prizes/physics…
A lot of this is way beyond me: I am not good enough at statistical mechanics to explain or use this directly. But I can see the shadows cast on the landscape by these results, and they are awesome. nobelprize.org/uploads/2021/1…
The start is spin glasses: solids where some atoms have spins that affect other spins, but in a disordered way (rather than the neat all parallel spins in ferromagnetic materials). They try to minimize their energy, but there will be frustration.
Read 21 tweets
2 Oct
#FridayPhysicsFun – Stretching the definition of physics a fair bit, sigmoid growth curves are useful… except for predicting the future.
Sigmoids get the name from being S-shaped curves, taking the name from Greek letter sigma. They are also called logistic curves, ogives, s-curves, Gompertz curves, Bass curves, Verhulst growth...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_…
First, an initially accelerating growth period, leading up to a turning point. Then the growth slows and the curve tends towards an asymptote (or maximum/ saturation level). There are many formulas that give such curves.
Read 20 tweets
3 Sep
#FridayPhysicsFun – I am back home in the apartment where I grew up on the 11th floor. That is about 30 m down to the street, and as a kid I often considered the fate of toys dropped from the balcony. How does falling really work? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagalund
The schoolbook answer is that the gravitational force F=mg accelerates the object as per Newton’s second law of motion F=ma and the falling object has an acceleration a=g because the mass factor cancels from both equations.
The velocity becomes v(t)=gt at time t, and the distance travelled d(t)=(1/2)gt^2. I remember kid-me inverting the later formula to t=sqrt(2h/g) and checking by dropping marbles that they took about 2.47 s to hit the ground. Fortunately nobody got hurt.
Read 17 tweets
3 Sep
Yet another rediscovery that simplified abstractions of neurons are simpler than the real thing! quantamagazine.org/how-computatio… To be fair, Beniaguev, Segev & London have a neat way of quantifying it using a kind of circuit complexity: doi.org/10.1016/j.neur…
IMHO the coolest result is that the NMDA receptors contribute a lot of the complexity in biological neurons: leave them out, and things simplify a lot. They are well placed to change properties deeply based on experience.
On the other hand, the fact that even ReLU-sum-of-weighted-input artificial neurons are not just computationally universal but actually work really well for real applications hint that maybe complex neurons are overrated.
Read 4 tweets
21 Aug
VQGAN+CLIP: "Moominvalley by Tove Jansson" (+trending on ArtStation)
+"rendered in Maya", +"Line art"
+"Tom of Finland" (the ultimate Finnish LGBTQ collaboration?) I really love the trees in the background.
Read 7 tweets
20 Aug
#FridayPhysicsFun – Normal crystals consist of atoms or molecules arranged in a regular lattice. Recently there has been experimental demonstrations of 2D Wigner crystals – crystals made of just electrons.
quantamagazine.org/physicists-cre…
The idea is pretty old: Eugene Wigner proposed in 1934 that electrons would repel each other and if the density was low enough form a lattice. The repulsion dominates over the kinetic energy and makes it “solid”.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_cr…
Too high density and they “quantum melt” as the kinetic energy dominates and the lattice dissolves. Too high temperature and they melt normally because of thermal vibration. 3D Wigner crystals need a lower density than 2D crystals to solidify.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(