Hindus like our women in Bindi.. We think they look even more beautiful wearing a Bindi. At least I do.
Problem is secular progressive libtards among us, cannot dare to speak this to the women they love - just to preserve their libtard image. 😀 Their loss...
It is really stupid of @FabindiaNews types - their largest market (i.e. Hindus) really like something.
They have this insight.
All they need to do is - have their models smiling cheerfully with diyas, fuljhaDis etc wearing Saari and Bindi wishing happy Diwali. Thats it. :D
Hindus may fancy all sorts of pouts and what not.
But on festive occasions, we do not like people fighting, or pouting or presenting themselves in a manner that we consider "inauspicious". Like not wearing a Bindi on evening of Lakshmi Poojan.. How dumb can one be? 😀
I am sorry, I am not very well versed with the "trends" on twitter. I usually write only what I have in mind and get out of here. So I am a bit late in this.
But excellent initiative by @ShefVaidya ji.. Full support. You spoke what all of us wanted to say.
There is a reason why Arthashāstra was a neglected political treatise until Brits excavated it out of oblivion. And there was not much memory of Maurya in general public discourse of Hindus.
Stories of vikramāditya or Bhojaraja are still popular. What does it tell us?
I like to call the chāNākyan school of polity as the “left handed polity”. Otherwise known as āpaddharma.
The main reference point of Hindu polity is either mahābhārata and rāmāyaNa (for example) and anushāsana parva of MBH for the theory of political and economic sciences.
That is precisely my doubt. If influence of V1 was so strong on Hindu community, why did a huge chunk of Hindu population gradually turn to Sikh Panth?
I presumed that this was because the hold of V1 on spiritual matters of all Hindus wasn’t strong enough.
But it has been very strongly rebutted by Punjab Brahmins on my TL since yesterday
I (not being a Punjabi myself) have accept that I was wrong and they are telling me things about their influence (historically) on Hindu society at large was strong as any other part of desh.
Sameer Wankhede’s video in mosque counselling Mullahs to use Sharia & Islamic Haram concept to keep Muslims away from narcotics (both as peddlers and addicts)
What he says is intersting : majority of arrested drug peddlers and drug addicts are Muslims
Sameer Wankhede’s mother was a Muslim and he too seems, for all practical purposes, a Muslim.
Although looks like officially he is a Hindu as was his father (Jñānadeva Wankhede).
He is married to famous Marathi actress Krānti Redkar.
All in all : based on all this, he is a अवघड जागेचे दुखणे (pain in a difficult/embarrassing location) for sekoolar parties.
Since he is a Marathi and married to a Marathi famous actress, his Marathi Manoos credentials are also impeccable 😀 thereby silencing Sena(s).
Any idea, group, memetic position, philosophy, a communal habit - anything that wishes to survive in India - has to survive with a collective blessings of Hindu society
Corollary - any idea/system/social-group that survives in India, has blessings of collective Hindu society.
This includes existence of systems (like constitution), or existence of ideas (like democracy, secularism etc) or a social grouping (minority non-Hindu religions and their adherents).
Their existence is because of whatever goodwill Hindus collectively have towards that entity.
The existence of non-Hindu ideas, memes, people and systems is NOT guaranteed by constitution or any other fancy construct.
It is Hindus as collective who have decided that the said system or construct should exist.
And it can only exist until Hindus as a collective wish it so
China was flooded with Opium which was forcibly grown in India by Brits and pushed in China with help of ancestors of some famous industrialist dynasties
Thereby underlining Balzac’s famous saying - Behind every great Fortune there is crime
But Balzac’s saying isn’t the point.
Point is - have the BIF (both phoren BIF handlers and their deshi sepoys) pushed to the wall (financially speaking) that they have increasingly resort of narcotics to fund their political and BIF activities?
Is desperation in BIF so high that they will enable what a section of Hongkong based Chinese merchants enabled by collaborating with British East India Company?
It is foolish (of BIF) to immediately enable drug-infiltration on massive scale in India so early after fall of AFG.