6529 Profile picture
23 Oct, 47 tweets, 11 min read
1/ What is an NFT?

Wait, what? Isn't this easy?

I am not so sure.

Let's take a look!
2/ Let's start with the definition:

[Non-Fungible] [Token]

This is a branding disaster since nobody had ever used the word non-fungible before NFTs.

But I think we are stuck with it now, so we need to make it work.

Let's address the [Non-Fungible] part first
3/ To understand non-fungible, we must first understand fungible.

"(of goods contracted for without an individual specimen being specified) able to replace or be replaced by another identical item; mutually interchangeable."

-Oxford English Dictionary
4/ One important observation is that very few things in life are fungible.

Look around you.

Your table, your ham sandwich, your husband or wife, your dog, your goldfish, your kid, your t-shirt, your rosebush, your neighbor, your car

All non-fungible
5/ We mostly encounter fungible objects in financial matters where fungibility is a simplification to make things efficient.

If you buy 10 shares of Google from your broker, you don't care which 10 shares you received, they are all 'mutually interchangeable'
6/ If you go to deli and buy a bagel with cream cheese and you pay with cash, neither you nor the deli owner care which specific $5 bill you are giving him.

BTC and ETH are the same way. When you pay for gas to snipe a Golden Snail, you don't care which ETH you are using
7/ OK, so all of that above is WRONG.

Bank Notes are actually non-fungible. See that serial number in the top left.

That is a unique identifier that tells you all types of things about the bank note

uscurrency.gov/denominations/…
8/ Google shares also are numbered.

The precise way to think about bank notes and company shares is that they are:

1) non-fungible financial instruments
2) that we have all socially decided to treat as fungible

OK, is that it? No there is more
9/ Money is not truly fungible, primarily due to anti-money-laundering regulations

Trying taking $1M in cash to your local Citibank branch and see how fungible it is

Or try wiring USD to/from North Korea

Or even, in a market far from the USA, try trading a torn bank note.
10/ OK, fine, what about grain? That is another fungible good.

Sure, we treat it as fungible for convenience, but it is certainly non-fungible.

If we had the technology to analyze every single grain of wheat in silo in an fast way, we would see they are all different.
11/ So the precise way to think about fungible objects IRL is that, typically, they are:

a) non-fungible objects
b) that we have decided to treat as fungible for convenience
c) except, in some cases, when we treat them as non-fungible after all
12/ Almost everything is non-fungible.

In a different path of history, NFTs would just have been called "tokens" and in the few cases that we want them to be fungible, we would have invented FTs ("fungible tokens").

But, here we are, so we proceed
13/ So what does a 'non-fungible' token mean in a crypto context?

It means something very simple. It has a number.

This is Fidenza #313 on the ArtBlocks contract. You see that "313" at the end of the URL?

That is the token number that ends in "313"

opensea.io/assets/0xa7d8d…
14/ Here is the Etherscan of the tx when the 6529 Museum acquired 313

What you are seeing is that two wallets swapped:

[1,000 Ether Tokens]
for
[1 Art Blocks token 78000313]

etherscan.io/tx/0x41c71c8a1…
15/ Go down one, and you get Fidenza token 312

opensea.io/assets/0xa7d8d…
16/ Go up one, and you get Fidenza token 314

NFTs are just numbered tokens. #312 is a different number than #313 that is a different number than #314. It is that simple.

opensea.io/assets/0xa7d8d…
17/ OK, but where is the art?

What art? NFTs are TOKENS.

Tokens can be used to represent anything, not just "art"

I could issue 100 6529PartyTokens and say "whoever has one, can come to my party on Saturday night"

And the lower the number, the more priority you get in line.
18/ I know this sounds dumb, but it is very deep. NFTs are tokens.

What you are buying, selling, storing in your Ethereum wallet is the token, nothing more and nothing else.

Once you understand this, you will actually understand everything about NFTs
19/ So back to Fidenzas.

How do we know that these specific tokens on this specific Ethereum contract represent the true and genuine Fidenza tokens?

Well because @artblocks_io (the platform) and @tylerxhobbs (the artist) told us, that is why.

This is also that simple.
20/ OK, but where is the art? Well, this depends on the specific implementation.

Let's go through in order from more to less centralized.

An NFT token has a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) which you can think of as a URL
21/ In the most centralized implementation of an NFT, that URL will point to someone's website with an image of the art.

So the model here is:
a) this token
b) points to this URL
c) at this URL is this JPG

Wait, what? This sounds fake? You are buying a URL?!
22/ No, you are not buying a URL.

You are buying a piece of art and the token is the certificate of authenticity.

Just like when you buy 6529PartyToken, and the URI has the address to my bar, you are not buying a URL, you are buying good times at my bar
23/ I bought an Andy Warhol Tomato Soup Can print a few years ago.

But there are also posters, replicas, fake Warhol prints and so on.

How did I know I was spending six figures on "the real one"?

Well, it is kindof disconcerting if you come from crypto land
24/ [Nice man at the gallery] See, this is Andy Warhol's signature on the back.

[6529] Cool! But how do I know this signature is real?

[Gallery Man] Here is this piece of paper where my gallery says it is real

[6529] How do you know?

[GM] We are a top gallery, etc, etc
25/ For someone used to cryptographic signatures, a piece of paper and some hand-waving was an utterly alarming confirmation on which to spend six figures.

But I wanted a soup can, the gallery is legit, I swallowed hard and bought it, counting that the social consensus was real
26/ By IRL art world standards, the provenance assurances for NFT art are so lol better that it is like comparing a rocket ship to a horse.

There are hundreds of thousands, soon to be millions of people, soon to be hundreds of millions who know @tylerxhobbs & Fidenzas
27/ And even if Tyler and the art blocks team are captured by aliens tomorrow, we are not all going to forget on which contract Fidenzas were issued.

Unlike with soup cans where I relied on an opaque assurance from an insider, anyone can check which wallet has Fidenza 313 token
28/ So back to where the art is? Pointing to a centralized website is ok, not great.

Why not great? Well someone, ideally, will keep the website running for a long time and people are bad at that.

Now, it is not as tragic as people make it out to be
29/ Why is the URI useful?

It is useful for automated services, progressively metaverse-like. The reason that @opensea and @oncyber_io know what to display on their website/gallery is that they follow the URI.

If the site goes down, the automated system will fail
30/ OK, that sounds bad? It is bad for unknown art.

If this happened for a famous piece of art, for which there is broad and practical social consensus about what the art is, it would not matter. People would link to somewhere else with a copy of the art and life goes on.
31/ OK, what is better than that?

The next step in decentralization of the art itself is to point the URI to decentralized storage like IPFS instead of to a website.

Now you are not relying on one website to stay up and anyone, including the buyer, can replicate
32/ This is quite good.

I think URIs pointing to IPFS or Arweave are more than good enough for pretty good longevity assurances.

If pieces are important, people will pin them and keep them alive.

This should be the market standard for now
33/ What comes after that? Well, you can put the art onchain - store the actual art on the Ethereum blockchain.

This is massively, hugely expensive because you are creating thousands of copies of it.

There you just need ETH to survive for longevity assurances
34/ This is only practical for procedurally or vector based art so the file size can be made small enough.

It can't work for, say, photography because it will be cost-prohibitive.

It will be a cool, but niche approach for now
35/ The 6529 Gradients have done both (IPFS and on-chain)

The SVG (vector file) for each gradient was written into the blockchain itself.

The URI points to a rendered image on IPFS

opensea.io/collection/652…
36/ So I think for art longevity, it goes as follows:

a) centralized website: OK, not great, can work for important art due to social consensus

b) decentralized storage: very good!

c) on-chain: great, but for certain cases only

d) on-chain + decentralized storage: nerd mode
37/ With that all taken care of, let's talk about the silly stuff.

"Right Click, Save As"

What you are buying is the certificate of authenticity, the token, and its security assurances are infinity times stronger than IRL art.

No faking it possible
38/ Right-click Saving As Fidenza 313 is exactly like Right Click Saving As a Warhol soup can.

You can download a Warhol for your computer
You can buy a poster online
You can commission someone to print a copy

But you don't own a Warhol original print that way
39/ The main difference between "can you fake a Fidenza?" and "can you fake a Warhol?" is that is infinity times harder to fake a Fidenza.

Sadly for him, Right Click Save As guy has it literally backwards.
40/ "OK, but everyone can see your Fidenza even if they don't buy it"

This is some weird stuff.

It is almost like these people have never heard of a "museum" where you can go see all types of art that you don't own.
41/ The fact that NFTs have solved the problem of:

"someone can own it and pay the artist"
and
"everyone in the world can see it and enjoy it"

is a huge boom to the world, to art, to public goods and to making the world a better place.
42/ You can confirm this by checking the opposite case.

Imagine that all the rich people in the world got together to buy all the art and hide it in a freeport warehouse in Geneva.

Is this something to be applauded or to be horrified about?

We are on the right side here fam
43/ I do not collect art to hide it from other people.

That my Warhol can only be in one place at once, and I can't have all of you over to see it, is a bug, not a feature.

Fidenzas can be both online and also printed on my wall if I choose
44/ "But you don't own the copyright to the NFT art"

This is also weird stuff.

I don't own the copyright to the Warhol soup can I bought either, the Warhol estate does.

I also did not acquire the copyright to the Harry Potter franchise when I bought the book at Amazon.
45/ One sec: I saw this in the replies and thought this deserved a place in the thread

46/ So, let's summarize the important stuff:

a) Everything is non-fungible
b) The token is the NFT
c) A token can represent anything (art is just the start)
d) Provenance is perfect in NFTs
e) NFTs have feature after feature after feature. IRL is kindof buggy tho 😉
47/ If you would like to learn more about NFTs or why fighting for an open metaverse is important, go to this pinned tweet.

The first link is educational. The second link is the plan.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 6529

6529 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @punk6529

16 Oct
1/ On The City Experiment

I started this thread below literally on a 1 second feelz-converted-to-a-tweet.

Been thinking about it a bit more and will share a couple of thoughts plus a new organizational model for the cities in the thread below

2/ For me the most amazing thing about art is "you get to see the world through someone else's eyes"

What more incredible thing than this? I go through life trying to absorb as much as possible - through travel, through books, through as much inflow to my brain as possible
3/ Art is another way to do this, from very practical "here is a picture of an iceberg or person that I might never see IRL" to conceptual "here is what Dali dreams about"

It is awesome
Read 10 tweets
13 Oct
1/ On Eyes On Earth and Citizen Science

First, you MUST go watch this remarkable piece of art by @MattScobel that joined 6529 Museum Permanent Collection

It is a 24 hour view of all satellites circling the earth

foundation.app/@scobel/~/95439
2/ Second, read about the process of putting this together

mattscobel.com/eyes-on-earth

Hundreds of hours of work went into compiling the data, modeling it, trouble-shooting it and so on.
3/ What do I see here?

I see the beginnings of a new funding model, not just for art, but for collectively funded citizen science.

This particular NFT is as much science as it is art, not far off from the type of work that might receive a research grant or be a thesis.
Read 14 tweets
7 Oct
1/ On the 6529 Gradient Collection

So now that @lphaCentauriKid is live with his SR Genesis piece...

...time to add some more end-of-week fun and send @6529er live with his NFT genesis piece.
2/ As most of you know, @6529er has designed the iconic 6529 logo.

I am obsessed with this logo. I sometimes go to my own profile page just to look at it.

It is, imho, @6529er's finest work.

It is time tonight to start step 1 of its journey into the metaverse. ImageImage
3/ A few weeks ago, I asked @6529er to think about how he would like to represent the logo in his genesis collection.

He came back with the type of austere, clean and subtle collection that I love.
Read 42 tweets
5 Oct
1/ On A Pathway To An Open Metaverse

We are going to make a run at changing the arc of history.

It is a Return of the Jedi vs the Death Star style mission.

They have the money and the power. We mostly have our brains, our community and gm.

But it might be just enough
2/ A step back.

6529 has been involved in crypto since BTC summer 2013.

From the first day, I was convinced that BTC and its successors would change the world, make it a better world, decentralize power away from choke points, and that this was a net good for humanity
3/ I played a small role in BTC's development and acceptance.

Small in the scheme of things, but important to me, and, at the time, it was a "risky" move.

And since then I have been waiting for our more decentralized social systems to emerge.

And waiting, and waiting...
Read 100 tweets
3 Oct
1/ On ETH Gas Prices

Are Ethereum gas prices expensive for buying, transporting and storing art?

My 🔥 take is that they are very inexpensive relative to what they are replacing

Is this because 6529 buys 1,000 ETH pieces? NO!

We will work it out on less expensive pieces
2/ I just bought some 0.1ETH "gm" pieces (so about $350) and have been paying about $35 in gas (10% of the price), so 90% to the artist and 10% in distribution costs.

Is that a lot 🐳or a little 🤏?
3/ Well, what is my alternative in IRL?

~ For any physical object you buy at retail for $350, not just 'art' but the cool vase on your bookshelf, somewhere between 40% to 75% of the cost is 'distribution' costs - from transportation to middlemen to the cost of the store / staff
Read 14 tweets
3 Oct
1/ So a friend asked me about this tweet - "doesn't this piss you off?" and I thought I would tweet my answer.

The short answer is "no"

Yes, at some level @Vince_Van_Dough / @StarryNight_Cap / @zhusu & "mystery billionaire" & 6529 are competing for certain pieces, but...
2/ ...it is much more important that our individual efforts aggregate to help the NFT art space.

It is easy to think about this in reverse.

If 6529 was the only buyer of generative art at >1,000 ETH, would the space be better or worse off?
3/ Another lens:

In a year, do I hope that there are 30 people/funds/daos competing for these top generative pieces or just the 3 of us?

I hope that there are 30, even though it will make things harder for 6529 Museum as a permanent buyer, not seller
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(