Eva B.C. Profile picture
24 Oct, 39 tweets, 18 min read
Thread 🧵:
1/ Yesterday, I've investigated a bit on the #AlecBaldwin & #HalynaHutchins tragedy.
I have good reasons to believe this was a Deep State operation and murder. By Deep State, I mean left and right Deep State ‘unity’. I think Alec Baldwin was used without his knowledge.
2/ I don't think Alec Baldwin is any saint. There are many things I dislike and disapprove of Alec Baldwin. He might be guilty of mistakes on the set and many others in his past, but I’ll show you why it can't be possible he intended this. He's a distraction from something huge!!
3/ Most of us haven't heard of Halyna Hutchins before this tragedy. She was a research journalist before she became a cinematographer. Let me show you a short bio I found on Instagram. There’s more on LinkedIn and other places, but this is enough to get a grasp of her background:
4/ Halyna’s husband, Matthew Hutchins, is a lawyer currently working at the firm “Latham & Watkins” in LA, California. He's been in this law firm for about a year. He was in other law firms before. I don't think he's a big fish on his current firm but he might have sensible info.
5/ The law firm “Latham & Watkins” is currently defending Michael Sussman, Clinton’s attorney recently indicted by John Durham for the Trump-Russia probe, hoax, or however you want to call it.

First I show you some reading about Michael Sussman’s case:

npr.org/2021/09/16/103…
6/ Other news about the case before moving forward to show that those who usually defend the Clintons also promoted this news. The hoax might be different than what we think it is:

bbc.com/news/world-us-…

amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/s…

nytimes.com/2021/09/15/us/…

reuters.com/world/us/us-gr…
7/ Now news about the firm defending Sussman in which Halyna’s husband works:

newspunch.com/alec-baldwin-s…

the-sun.com/entertainment/…

reuters.com/legal/legalind…



I only partially agree with this tweet but the news on pictures are real ⬇️

8/ You might be confused or think that it doesn't make sense, since Halyna's husband works on a firm that defends, doesn't attack, the Clintons. But there’s a picture of a tweet circulating on Twitter that Halyna might have written a couple of days before she was shot. This one:
9/ There's no way of knowing for sure if that tweet right above was written or not unless you're the Police in charge of the investigation. Halyna’ Twitter account has been disabled by someone. We can't see any of the tweets she wrote. Here’s her account:

twitter.com/halynahutchins…
10/ I believe the tweet above was written and published by Halyna. I don't base my opinion on fact but intuition. I've read a lot more than what you see on this thread.
My intuition comes from logic and evidence of conspiracy too:



archive.ph/2021.10.23-072…
11/ However, there's another picture circulating of a tweet from Halyna that I believe is FAKE. Also based on logic and intuition. I’ll get onto the Epstein framing later on in the thread, but for now, I show you what I believe is a fake not real tweet on a picture circulating:
12/Now let's move back to proven facts:
There were some issues during the filming. Some crew members protested and walked off hours before the tragedy took place. They were replaced by a nonunion new crew:

latimes.com/entertainment-…

nypost.com/2021/10/23/uni…

bbc.com/news/world-us-…
13/ I encourage you to read the articles right above. Details are quite bloodcurdling, and you’ll miss part of the plot without reading at least the first and last of the 3 right above.
That being said, I do NOT think Alec Baldwin, the 1st AD, nor the armorer planned this at all.
14/ Alec Baldwin, as the film producer, might be guilty of those poor working conditions and some serious mistakes with guns days before. That's part of the production team's responsibility. I’m not 100% sure here. I don't have all the necessary info.

But murder is not the same!
15/ Anyone who has worked in the film industry knows that, despite the causes, whenever there's trouble on a film set... the priority is to solve the problem to keep on filming. Anything else would be solved after filming hours.

The only exceptions are tragedies like this one!
16/ The reason I mentioned the previous tweet is because THE PRODUCTION TEAM BEHAVED AS EXPECTED. THE DEEP STATE KNOWS THIS.

It's not like an office. If some people stop working in an office, the rest of the office doesn't stop working. On a film set, everyone depends on others.
17/ It's easy for the Deep State to create such conditions from far outside if they want to.
It wouldn't be possible for you & me, but they certainly can, and they've done it several times.

I'm not forgiving Alec Baldwin for his part of the responsibility, but not as a murderer.
18/ There are many ways in which the DEEP STATE can modify the conditions on a film set without their knowledge. First, the BUDGET: Getting a lot, little, or none of the Government's indirect subsidies is one way. Another is authorizations and bureaucracy. And the list goes on...
19/ The Deep State is capable of interfering and controlling tiny details from outside... if they have the drive to do so. Many cases in history have proven it already.

Remember that new crew entered that same day on the film set. And not just any crew, but Halyna's camera crew.
20/ For those unfamiliar with the film industry it's good to know that real guns are often used for VFX, but NEVER WITH REAL BULLETS on a film set! EVER!
The only exception would be a real police officer or others for protection close by. But no one from the film crew, of course!
21/ I don't think it was an accident. Someone brought a real bullet to the film set and introduced it on the gun when nobody saw it. (The bullet that killed Halyna). Call me a conspiracy theorist, but there’s no film purpose in doing so. The only purpose I can think of is murder.
22/ Now let's talk about Epstein's plot. Here I have some uncertainties. It's the part of the puzzle in which I’m missing more pieces. For sure some want us to think Alec Baldwin was involved in Epstein’s operations. He is listed in Epstein’s black book:

23/ Here are other tweets so you can think of your own conclusions. I’m not sure honestly.







Here are some insights about his brother Stephen Baldwin. You know they don't get along:

24/ Conclusion:
Alec Baldwin couldn't possibly plan this tragedy. It doesn't make any sense. He’s not an unknown hatched man quite in the dark. Why would he want to destroy himself?

All the rest is not fortuitous, but the feasible prospective motive behind the murder for others.
25/ I don't think Halyna's husband planned this either. It was easy for him not to tell her anything if he suspected Halyna could be killed.
I believe this is a Deep State murder, sending them a message of what they can not talk about. Maybe Alec and Halyna’s husband know it now.
26/ I believe Alec Baldwin is the perfect distraction for the Deep State purposes with the Clintons, Trump, etc. Some get distracted supporting him or accusing him. Meanwhile, we're lacking key info that we know it's been purposely hidden. Maybe, or quite probably, by blackmail.
27/I would like to know some opinions since these types of cases are never truly solved. We see often how some detectives appear dead when the Deep State is involved. Doing their job properly is not appreciated. And we know for sure the Clinton connection. What do you guys think?
* On tweet 24 I wanted to write “quiet” not “quite.”
The left and right are both selling the same lie on media: “It was an accident.” Typical Deep State tactics: Different perspectives, same lie.
This was no accident! Anyone familiar with the film industry knows it if they use their brain for a minute. It can only happen by a plan.
I've found an amazing thread by a film armorer. It supports everything that I said about firearms on a film set and a lot more! (He's an expert on that particular field). I point out on pictures what I consider key to bear in mind on this plot of events.

28/ Wow!😨😱
I’ll explain and provide all the evidence on the🧵. This is part of the newly released affidavit for search warrant.

But here you have THE REASON why this murder could take place:

THE CART WITH THE GUNS WAS LEFT OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE DUE TO COVID19 RESTRICTIONS.
29/ ⬆️ About the previous picture, let me clarify again that it was NOT a prop-gun, but a real gun. It's not the lawyer's fault, but the MSM's fault for explaining it wrong to the public to mislead people.
I share again this thread from a film armorer that explains it perfectly:
30/ In this part of the document, the director wounded, Joel Souza, explained the rehearsal scene. So... whoever secretly introduced a real bullet on the film set and the gun... knew that Alec Baldwin would point the gun towards the camera lens with Halyna Hutchins right behind.
31/ Here Joel Souza explained what's true and I know by experience. The film crew is not checked, just as I've never been checked either for entering a supermarket or a bus. But guns should NEVER be unwatched, and live ammo should NEVER be on a film set!

32/ And they were shuttled to an area away from the set!

The perfect scenario for murder:
•The camera crew was replaced hours before.
•The cart with the guns outside.
•The film crew was shuttled away from the set right before the fatal rehearsal when Halyna was killed.
33/ The affiant “believes there is a probable cause.”

I don't only believe it, I’m 100% convinced. Despite all the negligence, (still in shock about the gun cart outside unwatched with the Covid excuse)... THIS CRIME COULD ONLY HAPPEN by introducing a real bullet INTENTIONALLY.
34/ As I promised, here you have the whole official document of the affidavit recently released. It's eight pages: 4 here, and 4 on the next tweet. And the link where I found it on the next tweet as well:
35/ Here are the last 4 pages, and the tweet with the link to the Facebook page where I found it.

36/ To end this first cycle, (now that it's clear this crime was INTENTIONAL and NOT ACCIDENTAL)... I bring you back to the beginning of the thread... in which I present several FACTS + CLUES that lead to my theory of WHO, HOW & WHY could have intended and PLANNED THIS MURDER:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eva B.C.

Eva B.C. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @eva2712

22 Oct
I don't think #AlecBaldwin is guilty at all, and I don't think the propman in charge of firearms brought a real bullet on the set either. The propman should have checked right before the scene, but I believe someone else introduced the bullet BEFORE with further base intentions.
Sadly, it wouldn't be the 1st time that the top commanding elites order such actions secretly to change politics and law. Sometimes they've been caught for doing so. If now that's the case, it wouldn't be new.

Remember: There's no reason for bringing a real bullet to a film set!
#AlecBaldwin
For those who don't know, real guns are used with blank bullets (NOT REAL BULLETS) quite often for sound and VFX. These 2 short basic links here show you.
The true question is:
Who brought a REAL BULLET to a film set?

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank_(ca…

Read 4 tweets
26 Sep
🚨💉🚨💉🚨

Thread🧵

1/ English 🇺🇸

Skip Spanish translation.

Please read the whole thread to understand the connection I've seen between this CERN forum about A.I. a week ago and the current Covid 💉s.

CERN’s Forum on September 18th, 2021, (last week):
🚨💉🚨💉🚨

Hilo🧵

1/ Español 🇪🇸

Por favor lean el hilo completo para entender la conexión entre el último fórum CERN (Consejo Eurepeo para la Investigación Nuclear) sobre I.A. y las actuales 💉.

Fórum CERN el 18 de septiembre, 2021, (la semana pasada):
2/ 🇺🇸

In the middle of the video (2 hours 3 min. 21 sec.), the host presents the next speaker:

ED BOYDEN, MIT Professor. He co-directs the MIT Center for Neurobiological Engineering.

The host presents A.I. mirroring us and asks him:
“Can mapping the brain help us simulate it?”
Read 42 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(