Share this page!

Seth Abramson Profile picture
Twitter logo
24 Oct, 4 tweets, 2 min read
(MAJOR FEED NOTE) This feed was cited in the House January 6 Committee's Report to Congress on holding Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress. I told folks PROOF was being followed by the Committee; I hope everyone will now accept that.

Link (see pg. 7): docs.house.gov/meetings/IJ/IJ…
(MORE) Here is the research from PROOF that Congress cited:
(PS) If you'd like to subscribe to PROOF and see the full range of evidence Congress is reviewing from my research and journalism on the events that led to the insurrection, the link is below. Some articles are free, some require subscription (just $5/mo). Sethabramson.substack.com
(PS2) As I mentioned a couple days ago, *much* more exclusive insurrection reporting is coming to PROOF this week.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture
26 Oct
(BREAKING VIDEO) Much of the raw intel Steele compiled—which he estimated to the FBI was 70% accurate—has been corroborated. Some was known at the time—and still—to be unconfirmable. Virtually none of it has been disproven. History will deem Steele a hero.
(INFOGRAPHIC) Anyone uninterested in Trumpist propaganda can easily find summaries of how the raw intel s
Steele compiled has fared with fact-checkers. It’s looking like his 70% estimate was almost exactly correct. An infographic on this is below.

Link: emptylighthouse.com/steele-dossier… ImageImage
(PS) This is the tip of an iceberg. In PROOF OF COLLUSION (Simon & Schuster, 2018) I curated reams of major-media reports on one piece of intel—the Ritz Moscow allegation—and found only evidence of its accuracy. There was no contrary evidence, even if also no conclusive evidence.
Read 6 tweets
Seth Abramson Profile picture
26 Oct
When will people understand that Trump isn’t endorsing men like Parnell, Walker, and Miller who have faced domestic violence allegations *despite* those allegations but *because* of them? Not only can Trump relate—as a known sexual predator—but he loves a “lying woman” narrative. Image
Trump’s 2016 campaign was little more than procedurally sanctioned misogyny—and after 2016 he found new women to abuse online: Pelosi, AOC, Ilhan Omar and countless others. Trump is a textbook monster whose fetish is hurting women. Maybe his endorsements should have that context?
I’m not kidding about this. As a Trump biographer I’m saying that if you put two candidates in front of him who were somehow equal in every way—but one of them had faced domestic violence charges—Trump would prefer him because he would see himself and his attitudes in such abuse.
Read 7 tweets
Seth Abramson Profile picture
26 Oct
Rittenhouse’s victims, who are dead and can’t defend themselves, have been put on trial—without hearing—by a judge and deemed guilty of the crimes of (1) riot, (2) theft and (3) arson. Meanwhile Rittenhouse—who agrees he killed people—gets to pretend it was a “victim”-less crime.
PS/ Please file this news under “things that would never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, *ever* happen to a Black defendant charged with killing a white person.” And I bet not *one white person* supporting this development today would cheer if the races were reversed.
PS2/ As a former public defender, I *agree* there are instances in which the word “victim” is inappropriate at trial—namely any case where the combination of allegation and defense is such that the trial’s purpose is to determine if there *were* “victims” as to *this* defendant.
Read 27 tweets
Seth Abramson Profile picture
26 Oct
NO.

This is unacceptable. Over a MILLION Americans have been infected in the last 14 DAYS, and 20,000 Americans have DIED of COVID-19 in the last 14 DAYS. And both those numbers are low because they're just what's confirmed so far.

No one—NO ONE—should be waving the white flag.
(PS) The "this is it" movement—such as there is one—is comprised of cowards who've decided that the United States can't act responsibly like almost every other country on Earth is. They've decided that the anti-vaxxers have won. They've decided that 50,000 dead a month is *fine*.
(PS2) No one disagrees that at the end of all this there'll be a "new normal." But the rush to declare that we've *arrived* at the "new normal" is a construction of corporate media—which wants to move on to other subjects—and a small number of cowards with (sadly) big megaphones.
Read 6 tweets
Seth Abramson Profile picture
26 Oct
Frank, I agree much of this is thin cruel. But to be clear, there’s no claim that Trump or his inner circle *aimed* for violence in the Capitol. There’s *ample* evidence to suggest they wanted the Capitol *occupied* long enough for the joint session of Congress to be postponed.
I’ve been working on January 6 for over 10 months, and have encountered little evidence the specific aim of Trump or his team was violence. But there’s a mountain of evidence they wanted the Capitol stormed and occupied.

What that required or looked like was little contemplated.
Prior to the Russia investigation, the allegation made by critics of the former president was that the Kremlin had bribed Trump into formulating a pro-Russia foreign policy. Trump fans *miscast* the allegation so that they could say it had been disproven after the Mueller Report.
Read 5 tweets
Seth Abramson Profile picture
25 Oct
MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: January 6 Organizers Say They Participated in "Dozens" of Planning Meetings With GOP Members of Congress and Trump White House Staff

As if there were ever any doubt, we can now be sure of why the GOP wants to kill the January 6 probe. rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
PS/ This new ROLLING STONE report dovetails with what I've been reporting at PROOF since late January: on January 4, 5 and 6 there were many Trump war rooms scattered around downtown DC. PROOF has detailed many of them—and the insurrectionists they hosted. sethabramson.substack.com
PS2/ ROLLING STONE confirms the reporting at PROOF since January with respect to the members of Congress *most* involved in January 6 planning.

PROOF—and now ROLLING STONE—identify these seven Republicans:

🔴 Biggs
🔴 Boebert
🔴 Brooks
🔴 Cawthorn
🔴 Gohmert
🔴 Gosar
🔴 Greene
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @SethAbramson has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @SethAbramson!

Read all threads by @SethAbramson

:(