It’s not a coincidence that Facebook profited off radicalization and sowing violence and insurrection.
This system is tuned, specifically, to reward destructive behavior and corporations that intentionally and ruthlessly ignore human consequences.
To fully grasp what Facebook has done and why it has done it, you also have to look elsewhere, to corporations that poison customers, that destroy the environment, that lie and cover up even when they know full and well they’re wreaking unbelievable damage.
This is systemic.
Facebook and other social media poison society and radicalize their users just as other corporations relentlessly destroy the world.
It’s the very nature of the corporate system that needs addressed, its lawless and unethical, unquestionably cruel, nature that needs changed.
What neoliberalism did by unleashing the corporation, by dismantling every roadblock and regulation, was to release a bloodthirsty and thoughtless monster onto the world. That it would come to destroy public life, democracy, and reality itself was an inevitability.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There’s just a direct line between pop country fetishizing fake working class white “culture” for middle and upper class conservatives in order to sell them trucks and cheap booze and this dangerous but patently absurd Right Wing movement.
I talk about it a bit here, but there’s so much to this authoritarianism that is rooted in consumer culture and overcompensation among an insecure population that finds an outlet and meaning in all this cruelty and gleeful ignorance.
Watching all these wealthy and privileged people pretend to be working class cowboys while supplementing their identities with big ticket purchases and the sneering anger of Trumpism is just so ridiculous and yet so dangerous.
Despite witnessing with our own eyes the attempted overthrow of the 2020 Election and our government, people in the media and politics continue to tell us it wasn't that bad, that it was just a brief blip
But the truth is that is was part of an ongoing authoritarian movement
2/
Though January 6th has been framed as the culmination of that authoritarian movement, its failure does not represent an *end* but a beginning.
Failed coups represent a crossroads. The choice is ours as to whether it grows and is eventually successful in its goals.
A stable society where people are treated humanely and enjoy freedoms is IMPOSSIBLE when the entire economy is programmed to reward businesses and grifters who peddle violent fascism as a product and view suffering as good for their bottom line.
AT&T’s cultivation and funding of OANN, a network rooted in white supremacist paranoia, is telling.
Radicalizing viewers and calling for fascistic executions is good for corporate profits. While it destabilizes society and gets people killed, it represents a sound investment.
The line between grift and ideology is razor thin and often nonexistent. What we’re watching with companies like Facebook is a recognition that dangerous, murderous ideas can be incredibly lucrative. And the corporate obsession with profit at all costs means they’ll sacrifice us.
Republican politicians banning mandates and ensuring their constituents will suffer and die, all to garner a brief thumbs up from Fox News, aid big business, and troll the opposition, is a truth that is so wildly horrific it’s almost impossible to really sit with for long.
Confronted with the fact that most of the GOP leadership and media class are vaccinated and enjoy the safety of mandates is a horror. It charges us to remember that so many of our crises are choices of pure greed and opportunism that override concern, empathy, and logic.
On tomorrow’s Muckrake Podcast we talk about rising fascism as corresponding with the wealthy seeing profit opportunities in marketing niches. And that’s what it comes down to. Grifters and opportunists prioritizing wealth and power over human lives.
I regret to inform you that even if the government is violently overthrown and blood runs in the street that leading publications are still going to feature articles worrying over “troubling trends on college campuses” and “the Left’s illiberal wokism.”
There’s too much money to be made in catering to populations worried about social change, too much in advertising, too much cache in creating a sense of “impartiality.”
Not to mention, the leading publications are owned by the wealthy who want to avoid any substantive change.
Again, the Left/Right, Liberal/Conservative paradigm you’ve been forcefed is nonsensical.
These publications run these articles because they have a huge incentive to stifle anything from actually changing. That would mean risking wealth and power.
From the very beginning, Manchin and Sinema have been taking advantage of how our media treats politics like spectacle and entertainment, using their dissenting votes as an opportunity to gain attention and fundraise through lobbyists looking to affect their decisions.
2/
By focusing on incidents like Sinema being followed into a bathroom, attention has been shifted from the legislation which will actually make lives better for living, breathing people into mini-scenes of morality and ethics.