1/11 In a new article with Mark Dawson published in @RegGov_journal, we argue that the #EU's current approach to accountability reflects a regulatory bias towards the process of decision-making and interest mediation. 👇
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
2/11 But the #EU is more than a regulatory state. We introduce the concept of the ‘para-regulatory state’ to describe increasing EU regulation in areas of core state powers that are both redistributive and politicized, e.g. fiscal policy, border control, police, public admin etc.
3/11 In these areas, we contend that the #EU requires a substantive notion of accountability, focused on the merit of policy decisions and their likely impact.
4/11 It is not enough to check the correctness of decision-making procedures and the extent to which they include ‘affected parties’ in the process.
5/11 To hold #EU executive actors accountable in a substantive way, accountability forums need to openly address questions of redistribution and political disagreement.
6/11 We illustrate our argument with two cases selected from the #emu, discussing parliamentary accountability in the #EuropeanSemester and judicial accountability of the @ecb
7/11 After showing the emphasis of procedures over substance in both cases, we make several recommendations on how to improve substantive accountability in the #emu.
8/11 For example, we propose that the @europarl could exercise parliamentary scrutiny in #EMU by drawing on a ‘Redistribution Scoreboard’ that would show the impact of #EuropeanSemester decisions across Member States. @EP_Economics
9/11 On the judicial side, a solution would be for the @EUCourtPress to demand more robust substantive justifications from the @ecb regarding the distributive implications of its decisions or to defend those decisions against alternatives.
10/11 We conclude that Majone was ultimately right: while accountability in the regulatory state might be legitimately grounded in procedural devices, accountability in the ‘para-regulatory state’ inevitably concerns the substance of policy.
11/11 We are grateful to Markus Jachtenfuchs, @ana_bobic and @BJMbraun for comments on earlier versions of the paper. The article is #OpenAccess and supported by @ERC_Research funding at the @thehertieschool @DelorsBerlin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adina Akbik

Adina Akbik Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(