1/11 In a new article with Mark Dawson published in @RegGov_journal, we argue that the #EU's current approach to accountability reflects a regulatory bias towards the process of decision-making and interest mediation. 👇 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
2/11 But the #EU is more than a regulatory state. We introduce the concept of the ‘para-regulatory state’ to describe increasing EU regulation in areas of core state powers that are both redistributive and politicized, e.g. fiscal policy, border control, police, public admin etc.
3/11 In these areas, we contend that the #EU requires a substantive notion of accountability, focused on the merit of policy decisions and their likely impact.
4/11 It is not enough to check the correctness of decision-making procedures and the extent to which they include ‘affected parties’ in the process.
5/11 To hold #EU executive actors accountable in a substantive way, accountability forums need to openly address questions of redistribution and political disagreement.
6/11 We illustrate our argument with two cases selected from the #emu, discussing parliamentary accountability in the #EuropeanSemester and judicial accountability of the @ecb
7/11 After showing the emphasis of procedures over substance in both cases, we make several recommendations on how to improve substantive accountability in the #emu.
8/11 For example, we propose that the @europarl could exercise parliamentary scrutiny in #EMU by drawing on a ‘Redistribution Scoreboard’ that would show the impact of #EuropeanSemester decisions across Member States. @EP_Economics
9/11 On the judicial side, a solution would be for the @EUCourtPress to demand more robust substantive justifications from the @ecb regarding the distributive implications of its decisions or to defend those decisions against alternatives.
10/11 We conclude that Majone was ultimately right: while accountability in the regulatory state might be legitimately grounded in procedural devices, accountability in the ‘para-regulatory state’ inevitably concerns the substance of policy.