This man, almost single-handedly made Glem a millionaire, but since Glem is a big pouty baby and they had disagreements (notably that Glem was dead-set on covering up the entire Russia scandal...and also supporting Donald Trump),
so he must be destroyed. Billionaires are EVIL, except for Peter Thiel, who is actually benevolent and really has some good ideas, if you think about it,,,
Nothing, and I mean nothing, drives Glenn more than petty personal animus. Some ally who has 'wronged' him or someone who has criticized him...they are his #1 enemy and he will attack them non-stop until the day he dies. Very similar to the former president (WHDNS).
Absolutely hilarious how the #1 reason this whistleblower is 'fake' is bc it was (in Glem's view) timed to serve a political purpose. The literal exact thing he argued was completely irrelevant when it came to Assange & Giuliani's Hunter laptop.
Julian Assange admitted, out loud, that his exact goal in his coordinated 'leaks' were to harm Hillary Clinton and disrupt the Dems. But again, that was cool. Motive was irrelevant then. But now...the only thing that matters is the motive. Highly principled journalism, yes sir.
(if anyone is not blocked, feel free to ask him what the difference b/w the two are. I'm sure he'll give you a nice, clear coherent answer.)
Anyway.....just another extremely normal day for an extremely normal, non-broken person in Glem-ville.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People ask, 'how could voters believe Dems have positions that they don't actually believe?' Well it's because the GOP bombarded them with lies about Dems and there's just not a great answer for such weaponized shamelessness. Truth just does not work.
The GOP (and its wealthy financial backers) have basically weaponized disinformation/lies to a completely unprecedent degree. And with the rise of technology are able to pump it out completely unchallenged (especially since social media outlets have completely given up).
So the NYT politics guys did a Reddit AMA several days ago. This was the top upvoted post. And then the extremely predictable (point proving) response.
And the predictably smug/condescending follow-up
Needless to say, they were heavily down-voted and deluged with (acurate) negative comments like these
#factcheck: Hamas is not keeping the hostages to rape them, they are just raping the hostages they are keeping for unrelated other reasons.
What....is even going on anymore?
I just don't understand why certain people feel the need to downplay Hamas' awfulness. It's not that hard to say that Hamas is an evil terrorist group, while also believing that innocent people do not deserve to die because of it.
Again, contra the lame "oh so you blindly trust the US govt" line from the above uhh journalists, the actual things to weigh:
Side 1- Israeli govt, US govt, every open-source analyst on this site & most importantly, the fact that the hospital was not destroyed
Side 2- Hamas' word
So yeah, I guess it's a real he-said, she-said if you just ignore everything but the competing government claims & also only pretend that the USG/Israel's 'lies' matter and not the fact that the initial claims by Hamas of the hospital being destroyed & 500-1000 dead, were a lie.
A lot of people I respect really, really showed their asses. And if they want to be able to maintain any sort of 'high ground' when it comes to journalistic integrity, really should at least make a basic statement that they got out over their skis.
And of course a lot of people who I don't really respect, but I don't expect them to ever admit they were wrong. Because that's just not what people do #onhere.
I'm not slightly 'gloating'. This entire site & almost all of the media falsely/uncritically ran with a characterization that relied solely on Hamas' word and created a major international incident. Sorry, if you don't think that deserves to be called out.