A Short Thread On Strength Training vs Training for Muscle Growth:
I thought I’ve explain this well enough but maybe not.
Strength and muscle growth aren’t inherently connected
Yes a bigger muscle is always a stronger muscle, but a stronger muscle is not always a bigger muscle
Strength Gains happen the most effective at lower reps, working with a higher percentage of your 1 rep max. Think 1-5 reps.
This actually has less to do with muscle than is does neural adaptation.
Your brain because more efficient at moving the weight via motor units.
Muscles Growth, or Hypertrophy is actually increase in a muscles size.
This happens when we work within 30-80% of our 1 rep max.
For simplicity this is 6-20 (even up to 30) reps.
This is caused by actual tension on the muscle and an adaptive response of the muscles size.
Training regardless of rep range will make you stronger if you’re applying progressive overload.
The key difference is your strength in the 1-5 rep range will be more neural adaptation. Where gaining strength in the 6-20 rep range is more of a muscle (fiber) size increase.
Simply put:
This is why bodybuilders grow bigger in relation to powerlifters.
Bodybuilders are directly training with the goal of making the muscle bigger.
Where powerlifters are trying to simply get stronger and develop a better neural efficiency with the weight.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's talk training frequency and performance: (A Rare Thread)
The reason volume (in terms of reps and sets per session) doesn't inherently equal growth is simple.
This is because LOAD or the amount of weight done over the weeks is what really matters.
I digress 👇👇👇
Training frequency matters for muscle growth even though some literature will say it doesn't.
They state 5–10 sets per week are suffice for growth and you can just do it all in one session and be done, growth has been optimized for the week.
There are major flaws here.
The reason being that if you perform all your sets of say, bench press, in one session, you will no doubt have to drop the weight after your first couple sets. Even if you keep the reps the same, the weight went down.
Any program or training philosophy is just a tool to achieve that goal result.
There is no 100% absolute answer, as it is simply a game of preference.
To caveat off this, there are more optimal approaches to specific goals.
Some will work better than others, this is simply a fact of biology and physiology.
But it is all nil if you cannot follow a program to achieve your desired results.
So for the IF crowd, the keto/carnivore crowd, and even the bodybuilding crowd:
Someone’s specific goals might not align with your philosophy and that’s just fine, at the end of the day all that matters is finding a lifestyle in-line with someone’s goals that they can adhere to.
This is a very popular subject I get asked about all the time.
I want to talk about this and break this down because there are right and wrong ways to do this.
If you’re going to do it, make sure you’re doing it optimal and safely.
Thread👇
First I’ll go over the pros and cons
Pros
- Lifting is done first thing.
- Gyms are less busy
- Start your day off strong
Cons
- Not properly hydrated
- A hard workout can mentally tax you (I’m worthless for a few hours after leg day)
- Fasted weight training is suboptimal
My biggest concern is hydration if you’re going to be lifting first thing in the morning.
Your muscles are comprised of mostly water, and you just went 6-8 hours without water (sleeping)
You need to ensure you have proper hydration for performance and safety reasons.