Hello Sue. I am a co-author of this report. Please could you expand a little more on what is ‘utterly abhorrent’ about this foreword? In either it’s content or the fact it’s attached to the report? 
https://twitter.com/suepascoe001/status/1452720855671267340
O dear. I appear to be blocked. Were I not blocked I would like to have a conversation about what exactly in the substance of this report which I co- authored did Ms Pascoe find so ‘abhorrent’.
Then go on to discuss the utility and purpose of describing arguments who don’t agree with as ‘utterly abhorrent’ rather than either engaging with their substance or respecting that person’s right to make the argument.
And to ask Ms Pascoe why it is acceptable for adherents of gender ideology to advance their cause by political lobbying - but not ok for its opponents? Why do you believe gender ideology should be promoted without criticism? What out of all the religions makes it so special?
I will venture a little guess. Because it affirms and elevates the entitlement of men over the safety and dignity of women and girls. And that makes it very appealing to some.
Active in what way I wonder? Referring to Sue Pascoe.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
