@RSI@senatorshoshana Allow me to expand. This is a big deal because it's another policy heavyweight, with significant credibility on the Hill, coming out in favor of a sentencing reform package that's flying under the radar of most reporters, but will do a lot of good once enacted.
@RSI@senatorshoshana But @RSI is *also* endorsing the Equal Act, as a matter of public safety and common sense. That bill would finally #endthedisparity in crack and powder cocaine punishment, but faces an uncertain future in the Senate despite a resounding 6-1 vote in the House.
@RSI@senatorshoshana Every voice matters here, but it's really beautiful to see the bipartisan, cross-ideological movement for criminal justice reform come together around such an important goal. Thank you to @RSI for this endorsement.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Barbarian invasions didn't singlehandedly topple the Roman Empire, nor did (per Gibbon and other scolds) some too-narratively-convenient collapse of republican virtue. Instead, the fall of Rome was at least in part a supply chain failure.
A short thread!!
Starting in the mid-second century B.C.E., the Roman state provided free or subsidized grain to some subset of the population. Egypt began to supply most of that grain starting in the reign of Augustus.
Fast forward to roughly 400 C.E. and, while Egypt now supplies Constantinople, the Western Roman Empire still depends on grain from North Africa. Around midcentury, though, Gothic armies capture North Africa. Regular traffic of grain ships across the Mediterranean *to Rome* ends.
Downplaying the increase in homicides makes it seem like “reform is a luxury.” That’s a mistake, says @JohnFPfaff. Really insightful point that turns the issue’s framing on its head.
Yes, crime in general is down. But violent crime drives the political discussion, and murder especially, says @JohnFPfaff.
This @ZaidJilani piece on policing waits until the very end to note that, for many, the policing-heavy status quo wasn’t working. That’s the core of the progressive argument for reimagining public safety — which he then faults progressives for not making. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Worth noting that the piece’s inflammatory framing — “progressive denial” of rising crime — isn’t even borne out by Jilani’s examples. @AOC and @JohnFPfaff are warning against a reactionary backslide into mass incarceration, NOT denying the need for a policy response to crime.
In Jilani’s defense, there ARE some progressives who treat rising crime as an (ahem) “inconvenient truth” rather than an urgent problem calling for creative solutions. But they are (thankfully) increasingly confined to the margins and shut out of serious policy debates.