That's correct, a thuggish group of black-clad "protesters" did steal my phone out of my hands as I was recording a public event, after which they forced me to recite a political slogan in order to get it back, then hurled objects at me and threatened to curbstomp me. Cool stuff
When this occurred, the reaction of journalists and activists (negligible difference between the two categories) was generally to praise the theft, the object hurling, and the threat of physical attack. Very cool stuff
People with profiles like this were huge fans of the tactic
This is definitely true, a lot of people on Twitter -- many of whom love to brag about how conscientious and empathetic they are -- thoroughly enjoyed this display of thuggish, violent behavior
This Rolling Stone article that's supposed to contain bombshell new Jan 6 info is a complete dud. It's been public info since well before Jan 6 that dopey GOP members of Congress met with dopey "Stop the Steal" organizers like Ali Akbar. This is just repackaged to seem shocking
How is it at all revelatory, for instance, that Madison Cawthorn's staff communicated with "Stop the Steal" organizers, when Cawthorn was a speaker at the official Jan. 6 "Stop the Steal" rally? What, we previously thought that he just showed up randomly to that event?
Not surprisingly Dem members of Congress wasted no time feverishly sharing the article, which writer Hunter Walker sure seems to appreciate. In doing so they conflate holding meetings about a public, legal political demonstration with having "helped plan" a terrorist attack
The Intercept, @ryangrim, and @nathanTbernard most of all owe an apology (and a retraction) to the Bates College student journalists they defamed. It’s utterly ridiculous:
It's simply impossible for The Intercept to defend Nathan Bernard's fraudulence. So they're going to continue obfuscating and hope that an insufficient number of people notice this revelation of blatant journalistic misconduct. That's their only tactic
Bernard and The Intercept were in such a big rush to "scoop" a story about a small liberal arts college in Maine, that just went off a faulty activist press release without bothering to verify anything -- thereby proliferating false, defamatory information mtracey.substack.com/p/to-suit-its-…
To Suit Its Ideological Agenda, The Intercept Fabricated A Censorship Story That Even The Censorship "Victims" Denounce As False mtracey.substack.com/p/to-suit-its-…
The Intercept dramatically declared that two student journalists at Bates College had been "censored," but they didn't even bother to contact the journalists to ask them if they had been censored -- which the students both vehemently deny. Really bizarre journalistic misconduct
I likely never would have even noticed this relatively insignificant story if Intercept writer @nathanTbernard hadn't badgered me to cover it, lest I be totally owned for hypocrisy. So I covered it, and of course it turns out to be largely BS. (Bernard has stopped replying to me)
The grim trajectory of an aging activist Radical Rocker
I am so owned for hypocrisy! I’ve definitely spent decades branding myself as the most Radical of all Radical Activists, only to then join forces with the pinnacle of establishment media... Substack
Part of the “Facebook Whistleblower” PR strategy is to insist that her prescriptions are steadfastly non-political, but in a Zoom forum she cited the rabidly pro-Democrat group “Pantsuit Nation” as an example of a Facebook-enabled social movement that she wants to preserve
Another part of the PR strategy is for Frances Haugen to speak in nonsense "natsec" jargon to demonstrate how very Serious she is. This, along with phony appeals to children's safety, is a smart tactic for duping gullible Republicans who are otherwise hostile to online censorship
As much as I would love to provide specifics about this particular situation, I can't, because the student in question is extremely paranoid -- for good reason -- about going on the record. These creepy, institutionally-backed snitching protocols are disturbingly effective
The latest update from UC San Diego, which now classifies mask-wearing as a "psychological" safeguard. Raises the question of when a "pandemic" of emotionally-driven paranoia could ever actually end