Apart from the increasing level of humour of this story, there's a problem of our discourse that is dangerous for our society and our future. /1
Apparently a moderator invited someone from an organization he profoundly dislikes to interview him. He regarded the person as discredited when the person stated he's a carpenter - and thus works with dead wood. His mind turned off. /2
When the carpenter pointed out that we can grow wood, the moderator curiously stated that we can also grow concrete - and now seems on a mission to confirm this wrong statement. Why is this tragic? /3
Because in this latest video the moderator explicitly states that cement is a disaster for the environment because of CO2. The carpenter, it is safe to say, would agree. And again - why is this tragic? /4
Because there's an intelligent debate to be had about sustainability. Is wood generally sustainable? What wood? Can concrete be made more sustainable? And how? But instead we pigeonhole people and on the basis of this close our brain. We don't listen. /5
The original show could have become a good, interesting and informative one we need. Instead, we get attempts at discrediting people.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Holger Hestermeyer

Holger Hestermeyer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hhesterm

27 Oct
The 24 hour news cycle at work. Here's a quick deescalation thread to explain (thread)
France was contemplating measures. Apparently in a press meeting these were discussed under the heading of "seafood ban" (h/t @jonhenley ). This lead to the times report. thetimes.co.uk/article/france…
Now a seafood ban in my off-the-top-of-my-hat analysis seems to breach the TCA. (Is it a countermeasure? Cannot do those under the TCA if you don't find wording to support it). BUT...
Read 5 tweets
24 Oct
So here we go: Why Weiss and K 3/21 (the decision of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal) are - in law - fundamentally different. A thread. Even I hope it won't be a long one. (Thread)
Let's start with the caveats. First of all there's a ton of writing on composition of Polish courts and all that. This is not a thread about those issues. Others have written competently about that.
Second caveat: I do not read Polish, I have to rely on the translation provided by the Polish Court itself. I do not like the translation the BVerfG provides. I assume there will be problems with the Polish Court's translation, too. But let's assume the basics are ok.
Read 24 tweets
13 Oct
Quick thread with links to EU proposals.
1) Q&A overview ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
2) Governance (or stakeholder engagement) ec.europa.eu/info/system/fi…
Read 9 tweets
28 Sep
What I learned from twitter today about the driver shortage: the statistics of which country lacks how many drivers are all problematic. Why?
Because the implication of that number is unclear. Poland, for example, lacks far more drivers than the UK. But the reason is that Poland is a market for drivers servicing logistics all over the EU.
Cross-border delivery of services and cabotage have a significant impact on the reality of EU trucking that is poorly represented by "X drivers are missing".
Read 5 tweets
28 Sep
The capacity to correct mistakes. A Brexit tragedy in 3 acts. (Thread)
Act 1: The realization that the EU is slow in correcting mistakes. Motivating some people to say we need to leave the EU.
To build a majority, those who simply don't want to be in the EU and those who have such abstract considerations are insufficient. Promises are made. Consequences talked down.
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
I fear I profoundly disagree with Andrew in this regard. Leaving for the sake of leaving as @iainmartin1 expresses here is entirely legitimate - and we would be better of if people had been frank and open about this. Let me explain this point of view (thread)
@iainmartin1 But I do not want to explain this in terms of Brexit, but in terms of Switzerland (yes, I did that once years ago, but it‘s worthwhile to recall that). So here we go: Switzerland is a great country. Richer than we are. And many would say more democratic than many /2
However, I do not want to be part of Switzerland. Personally I do not get the Swiss type of democracy, I cannot emotionally relate to the magic formula at all and would not call Switzerland more democratic. But it‘s the Swiss way and that‘s fine with me from the outside. /3
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(