The people who talk about a "civil war" and independence from the USA have no real idea what it would mean and don't really want it. They want their lives as they live them now, but with some sense that they've settled scores with people who look down on them. /1
They don't really want to know what life would be like without the US infrastructure. They want everything they have now, but with some sort of authority figure who says "It's okay to be terrible. We went and hurt those other folks. Oh, and here's some cash for your pain."
/2
Now, I suppose there are people who are just too stupid to understand that "secession" means "You have to fix all the highways that have that blue shield on them," and "you'll have to use MAGA Bucks instead of the dollar," but most of them really aren't that stupid. /3
They mean "Civil War" as "I want approval to advocate terrorizing people I think are judging me."
These same people, of course, *relentlessly* judge their own fellow citizens and think of them as monsters. Their "equality" is limited to "equality for people like me." /4
Their anger is especially hot now because they've found - as the rest of us warned them - that winning in 2016 wouldn't fix anything, and would only show them later that a majority of their fellow citizens do not agree with them and find them...deplorable. /5
At some point, maybe there will be enough broken families and friendships that some of these folks will get off the ledge. Most won't. They will, like their predecessors in 1865 and 1965, go to their graves thinking they were wronged. /6
There is nothing you can do about this except to lower the temperature by not engaging with the same rancor. Be calm, civil, and outvote them.
I wish there were better answers. But this isn't going to change via rational argument or appeals to conscience. /7x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A quick thread here on working as an academic in the military. I agree with @CarrieALee1's thread on the upside, in general: The money/benefits are insanely good, no methodological warfare, policy-relevant research, etc.
BUT:
/1
cc @dbyman@notabattlechick@JRHunTx
@CarrieALee1@dbyman@notabattlechick@JRHunTx There are downsides. You are working for people who do not understand education and who are, in the main, suspicious of educators. It's a culture clash that is built-in to the institutions. Many of your superiors have no idea what you do all day and think you're not "working." /2
Although tenure is now spreading to PME (thank heavens), the contract system breeds short-term thinking and a timid faculty that is centered way too much on pushing the right buttons for student evaluations. PME students was *way* overempowed in this regard. /3
My former comrades on the right saying that "Because Mitch didn't dump the filibuster in 2017, he never will" are acting as if the past four years didn't happen. So, to use a political science term, let us engage in cutting the shit here for a moment. /1
McConnell and the GOP are without principle; their only principle is power and the expediencies that create power. In 2017, it was not in Mitch's interest to end the filibuster, especially with the risk that the GOP would lose seats in 2018. He knew he might need it. /2
This is the same McConnell whose respect for norms and tradition denied Garland a hearing and rammed through Barrett weeks before an election he knew Trump was likely to lose. He's a master of obstruction and opportunism. So let us cease this nonsense about Mitch's principles. /3
This is a great piece about why nostalgia about that "better time" is bullshit. (Well, it's about more than that.) A few observations, and h/t @RuleandRuin
Why Is Every Young Person in America Watching ‘The Sopranos’?
/1
First, it's a great reflection on how nostalgia runs in regular and stupid cycles. The young people watching The Sopranos are nostalgic watching someone be nostalgic about the period before The Sopranos; nostalgia watching the 2000s while watching someone hating the 2000s. /2
Second, it's a warning that maybe we're now a lot more like Tony than we want to admit. I've said something like this is my recent book about the bored middle-class looking for meaning. That was Tony: Affluent, bored, somewhat self-hating, adrift and depressed. /3
Let us consider for a moment what one of Breitbart's Big Thinkers is admitting 1. Vaccines work 2. Vax resistance is almost entirely partisan 3. Unvaxed people are dying in large numbers
He then gets from this to: THIS IS THE LEFT'S ENTIRE PLAN!
/1
Now, it is *possible* that this is double-triple-reverse pro-vaccine psychology: "They don't REALLY wants us to get vaccinated, so we better do it!"
No one at Breitbart is that smart, so let us consider an alternative explanation.
/2
The more likely explanation is - as it always is - "Look at what you sneering elites made us do."
That way, when people die, it's STILL not their fault, you see. They were bullied into NOT taking the vaccine because they were disrespected or something. So it's on you lefties. /3
Here's what I think - so far - about the Milley business.
- Calls for him to resign are stupid.
- Calls to fire him are stupid.
- The call to China was a *good* thing
- It's a legit question about whether he was preemptively countermanding possible orders from the CINC.
/1
Bad-faith calls from craven opportunists like Rubio mean nothing. And no CJCS has ever had to deal with a mentally ill president who was actively trying to overthrow the constitutional order. But before we cheer any of this, let's remember that everything becomes precedent.
/2
Milley, I think, was trying to steady the ship in case Trump called in some more junior guy and said "Get me Xi on the phone and bring the football." But you don't want it to become a thing where CJCS can say "ignore POTUS orders unless you clear with me." That's dangerous. /3
Few people can write with the same kind of spiritual awareness and kindness of spirit @DavidAFrench brings here. And yet, I am part of the "empathy crisis" he describes. In fact, I am worse: I am past judgment and anger. I have reached indifference, and this, I know, is a sin. /1
@DavidAFrench I feel this enough that I have discussed it with my clergyman. But I also cannot make myself feel something that I cannot feel. I do not gloat or sneer at the deaths of others. What worries me, now, is that these stories have little impact on me. And I am not alone in this. /2
Months of being told "leave me alone" have led me, finally, to cease arguing. I am respecting other adults and fellow citizens in their choices. Yes, I am angry that their choices produce costs on the rest of us, to be sure. But for their illnesses, I am struggling to feel. /3