I have this theory that professionals can only communicate in 2 directions, which is why it’s very rare to see union leaders in the press. A short 🧵…
CEOs communicate down, to their employees, and also out, to the world. They’re generally the main spokesperson for the company.
Individual experts within the company are sometimes asked to talk about their area of expertise, while also communicating up to their managers. Out and up is ok.
Middle managers, who have to communicate both down to their direct reports and up to their own managers, are quoted less often: down and up and out is too many directions.
Union leadership has to communicate to members and also to employers. It’s a delicate balance at the best of times. Adding in public messaging would only serve to confuse matters, which is why you tend to see it only at the very biggest unions, dealing with many many employers.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Felix Salmon

Felix Salmon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @felixsalmon

21 Oct
Trying to work out what this could be. “A successful enforcement action, as well as two related actions, by a U.S. federal regulator and a foreign regulator.” In the amount of about $1b-$2b. cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres…
I mean, if the CFTC is going to put out blind-item press releases, of course we’re all going to start guessing
But I’m having difficulty thinking of anything recent and CFTC-adjacent that reached $1 billion or more
Read 4 tweets
10 Jun
I have a story out this morning about the staggering amount of unemployment fraud that has happened over the past year — as much as $400b. A quick 🧵:
axios.com/pandemic-unemp…
First, yes, this data comes from security companies with skin in the game — ID.me and LexisNexis. Also, crime statistics are always fuzzy. There's nothing here that's precise. On the other hand, government sources aren't disputing these numbers.
The big picture is that unemployment fraud has become systematized. It's sold on a SAAS basis on the dark web, and it's operated by very sophisticated international syndicates in Russia, China, Nigeria, and increasingly Romania.
Read 8 tweets
1 May
I’m genuinely interested: Who is the man on the left, and what does the $2.1m number refer to?

Ed Ruscha’s “Hurting the Word Radio #2” was bought directly from the artist in the early 70s by Joan & Jack Quinn, for much less than $2.1m; they sold it for $52m. Image
cc @MasterworksIO who might be able to shed some light on this
Ok so mystery solved on who the man is, he’s a stock-photo model istockphoto.com/photo/ambition…
Read 6 tweets
28 Apr
My free idea for Substack: Allow people to pay for emails they’ve read and enjoyed, rather than forcing them to only pay for emails that haven’t even been written yet.
A subscription is a big commitment. But when I read a great email like @CaseyNewton’s yesterday, I would love to pay him a buck or two to say “thank you for doing that reporting, this was great.”
An ex-post payment system has other advantages. For one thing, it encourages broader distribution, rather than paywalls. For another, it’s a great real-time indicator of what your audience loves and values and wants to read more of.
Read 8 tweets
12 Mar
Where can I find the download link if I want to download the 21,069 x 21,069 Beeple that just sold for $69 million? Is that possible?
Found it! Here it is: ipfsgateway.makersplace.com/ipfs/QmXkxpwAH…

It really is an interesting artwork. For one thing, at least one of the Everydays is duplicated: Image
Also even at 21,069 x 21,069 resolution, some of the Everydays are so small that they get very pixelated if you try to zoom in on them. Image
Read 5 tweets
13 Sep 20
Here’s @andrewrsorkin on Friedman and stakeholder capitalism. His choice of words here — “making” stedda “growing” — is an important sleight of hand that often undergirds my debates with @Three_Guineas on this subject. nytimes.com/2020/09/11/bus…
Hotels are some of the longest-running businesses in the world. So let’s consider a hotel that has been run by the same family for 250 years. Its owners need to *make* money, sure. They’re rich capitalists. But they don’t need to *increase* their profits every year.
Since 1972, the idea of “shareholder capitalism” has morphed from “companies need to make enough money to be able to pay their dividend every quarter” into “companies need profit *growth* that will cause their share price to rise indefinitely.”
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(