My free idea for Substack: Allow people to pay for emails they’ve read and enjoyed, rather than forcing them to only pay for emails that haven’t even been written yet.
A subscription is a big commitment. But when I read a great email like @CaseyNewton’s yesterday, I would love to pay him a buck or two to say “thank you for doing that reporting, this was great.”
An ex-post payment system has other advantages. For one thing, it encourages broader distribution, rather than paywalls. For another, it’s a great real-time indicator of what your audience loves and values and wants to read more of.
Micropayments are logistically difficult, but that’s where Substack’s scale comes in. Over the course of a month, readers might rack up enough payments to make the processing fee more manageable. And writers could be paid monthly too.
The risk of course is that micropayments will cannibalize subscriptions. But Substack could use them as a driver of subs, too. “You paid Casey $15 last month. Would you like a $100/yr subscription instead?”
Micropayments also encourage and monetize high-quality occasional newsletters from people who don’t have the time to make them a full-time job.
The central insight here is that newsletter subscriptions are already a way to pay an individual more than they are a way of accessing specific information. So, make those payments easier!
cc @hamishmckenzie & @cjgbest, obviously

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Felix Salmon

Felix Salmon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @felixsalmon

12 Mar
Where can I find the download link if I want to download the 21,069 x 21,069 Beeple that just sold for $69 million? Is that possible?
Found it! Here it is: ipfsgateway.makersplace.com/ipfs/QmXkxpwAH…

It really is an interesting artwork. For one thing, at least one of the Everydays is duplicated: Image
Also even at 21,069 x 21,069 resolution, some of the Everydays are so small that they get very pixelated if you try to zoom in on them. Image
Read 5 tweets
13 Sep 20
Here’s @andrewrsorkin on Friedman and stakeholder capitalism. His choice of words here — “making” stedda “growing” — is an important sleight of hand that often undergirds my debates with @Three_Guineas on this subject. nytimes.com/2020/09/11/bus…
Hotels are some of the longest-running businesses in the world. So let’s consider a hotel that has been run by the same family for 250 years. Its owners need to *make* money, sure. They’re rich capitalists. But they don’t need to *increase* their profits every year.
Since 1972, the idea of “shareholder capitalism” has morphed from “companies need to make enough money to be able to pay their dividend every quarter” into “companies need profit *growth* that will cause their share price to rise indefinitely.”
Read 5 tweets
8 Jul 20
These are two wildly different things, @nathanielpopper. How can you conflate them? nytimes.com/2020/07/08/tec…
@nathanielpopper If you’re dividing revenue by average account size, then obviously mostly what you’re measuring is the number of accounts, not revenue per account or per dollar.
This doesn’t make sense either. What is it supposed to mean that Robinhood trades 25,840 options contracts “for every dollar in the average customer’s account”? It’s a nonsensical metric.
Read 4 tweets
29 May 20
This "Catherine the Great" story in Tatler just broke my mind so I am going to have to tweetstorm it sorry
This is the lede. Um wat?
"gruelling" = 11 engagements in 1 month. (Next graf: "She’s working as hard as a top CEO.")
Read 15 tweets
31 Jan 20
I really don't think I'm exaggerating when I said that today, more than any other day, marks the end of the world as we knew it. (thread)
I was in Piccadilly Circus at 11pm London time, when the UK officially left the EU. The big billboard was a huge sign saying "London is Open". But who were they trying to kid.
It was just hours after the Trump administration announced that the entire USA was closed to any foreigner who had travelled to China of late. (Citizens can come back, but only if they can find a flight, and they face 14 days' quarantine if they've been in certain areas.)
Read 9 tweets
9 Jan 20
My theory about the Teen Vogue / Facebook fiasco is that it was a classic corporate cock-up on both sides. (1/5)
On the FB side, one part of the company decided to sponsor the Teen Vogue conference, and buys a package that includes website sponcon. So they say "here, write an article about these women," make the necessary introductions, and are then promptly forgotten. (2/5)
FB dutifully trots out the women for Teen Vogue, which equally dutifully writes the puff piece, which then gets dropped into the CMS and inadvertently published without the necessary #sponcon disclaimers. When Conde realizes the error, they put a disclaimer at the top. (3/5)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!