It's hard to overstate what a scam academic and scientific publishing is. 1/
It's run by an oligopoly of wildly profitable companies that coerce academics into working for free for them, and then sell the product of their labors back to the academics' employers (often public institutions) for eye-popping sums. 2/
Here's how that works: a publicly funded researcher (often working for a public institution) does some research. In order to progress up the career ladder and secure more funding, they need to publish their research in a prestigious journal. 3/
That journal asks other publicly funded researchers (chosen by a volunteer editorial board of publicly funded researchers) to peer-review and edit the paper. 4/
If the paper is selected for publication, the researcher signs over their copyright in it - life plus 70 years - to the journal, for free.
Then, the sales department of the journal pays a call on institutions that pays the salaries of the paper's authors. 5/
They offer a "subscription" to the journal - that is, access to a database that costs almost nothing to maintain - that can cost tens of thousands of dollars per year. Journal subscriptions have experienced rapid, sustained price inflation for decades. 6/
If someone at that institution were to share the paper their colleague produced in the next lab over, they'd be committing copyright infringement - because their colleague had to give their copyright as a condition of publication, which is a condition of career advancement. 7/
This is #ChokepointCapitalism at its finest: publishers' primary "asset" is a legally defensible barrier between academics and their career prospects, so it can coerce them into accepting all kinds of abusive conduct. 8/
But as bad as it is that billion-dollar multinationals are extracting huge, parasitic rents from our publicly funded knowledge-creation system, that's really just the tip of the iceberg. The real harms come from what this does to science and scholarship. 9/
Locking up all those papers means that researchers who aren't affiliated with wealthy institutions are denied access to the raw materials of study and experimentation. 10/
(Naturally, this problem is most keenly felt in the Global South, which means that scientists and scholars in poor countries are denied access to the materials that might help them alleviate the scourges of poverty). 11/
Just as bad is the problem of the study of knowledge itself - the kind of textual analysis that can reveal holes, biases and defects in our research programs. 12/
Large-scale text-mining is essential to this kind of work, especially when it comes to fighting corruption in science. 13/
Back when @aaronsw was at Stanford, he used his access to the digital law library to do text-mining that showed that when law schools got money from fossil fuel giants, their scholars produced papers that exonerated carbon barons from liability for climate change. 14/
No one knows what Aaron was doing when he downloaded millions of papers from MIT - an act that resulted in his malicious prosecution, leading to his eventual suicide. But many of Aaron's friends suspect he was in the early stages of a similar project. 15/
Aaron's was not the first researcher with a great idea for text-mining analysis, and he won't be the last. And the next Aaron will have a much easier time of it. 16/
That's because @carlmalamud has just released "The General Index" - a full-text-searchable index of 100,000,000 scientific articles.
The catalog contains 355 billion words, and returns five-word snippets (firmly within fair use's boundaries) and citations in response to queries. It's publicly available for all to mine and search.
It's the latest in a series of breathtaking open knowledge efforts from Malamud, who was a frequent collaborator of Aaron's. 19/
And it's part of a wider movement to free up access to scientific and scholarly knowledge by any means necessary, from wildcat efforts like @sci_hub_ to the campaign to end #VaccineApartheid:
ETA - If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
TECHNICALLY I'm on holiday, visiting family overseas, and offline until mid-Nov. HOWEVER, I read an amazing novel on the flight and HAD to post a review. Enjoy! 2/
The paperback for Attack Surface - a standalone Little Brother book for adults - is out!
"LaserWriter II" is Tamara Shopsin's fictionalized history of Tekserv, NYC's legendary Apple computer repair store. 1/
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
It's a vivid, loving, heartfelt portrait of an heroic moment in the history of personal computing: a moment when computers transformed lives and captured the hearts of people in every field of endeavor.
This is (probably) the last installment of Pluralistic in all its form until mid-Nov; I'm leaving for an overseas family holiday to see our relatives in a few hours and unless something really urgent happens, I'll probably not be back until we return and shake off the jetlag. 2/
The paperback for Attack Surface - a standalone Little Brother book for adults - is out!
Last year, the EU introduced the #DigitalServicesAct as part of a package of anti-monopoly measures aimed at US-based Big Tech. EU regulators could lead here, since - unlike US regulators - they don't have to worry about Big Tech as a source of national "soft power." 1/
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
That's why the EU gave us the #GDPR, a serious and far-reaching privacy law. 2/
Unfortunately, the GDPR has been hamstrung by its enforcement problems. Under the GDPR, enforcement is delegated to each country's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). 3/
The DMCA was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1998. It has a weird history. Its inception came from Bruce Lehmann, Microsoft's chief copyright enforcer, whom Clinton tapped to serve as his Copyright Czar. 1/
This was back in the "Information Superhighway" days, when Al Gore was holding hearings on the demilitarization and commercialization of the internet. 2/
Lehmann presented Gore with a proposal that was so utterly bonkers that it made subsequent net.lunacy ("series of tubes," etc) look reasonable by comparison.