Schweitzer answered the question. He just did it like a coy politician. He says HE didn’t fire her. He points to Human Resources and identifies the Premier’s office as running HR.
So that narrows it down to a few people.
So that narrows it down to a few people.
https://twitter.com/staysaif/status/1453770732744286232
It could be the premier, his chief of staff, or Director of Issues Management. Maybe a couple others, but that’s it.
A likely scenario was Dreeshen complaining to Kenney that his ex intimate partner was harassing him. Kenney said get rid of her and one of the others made it happen. But that’s a guess.
The question remains, did Dreeshen get a lecture from Kenney about inappropriateness of sleeping with the staff and drinking to oblivion at the Legislature? Or did he turn a blind eye.
Of note: Schweitzer was demoted by Bumbles. And replaced with a Dominionist. Indicating Schweitzer is not part of the radically religious crowd.
Madu is.
Madu is.
The divide in UCP is between the radically religious Wildrose and the far right libertarians who still retain some modicum of morals and ethics.
It’s the same divide in CPC.
It’s the same divide in CPC.
Dominionists have a firm grip on power and want more extreme policies implemented. More in line with their quasi-religious fascistic beliefs and values.
Sounds like after the fourth wave death policies, the Austrian economy libertarians are having second thoughts about Kenney.
Sounds like after the fourth wave death policies, the Austrian economy libertarians are having second thoughts about Kenney.
Leela Aheer is a Dominionist. They are having second thoughts about Kenney’s commitment to the ideology as well.
Both Aheer and Schweitzer were demoted by Kenney.
Unsurprising. Narcissistic autocrats surround themselves with “yes men” to prevent a challenge to their power.
Both Aheer and Schweitzer were demoted by Kenney.
Unsurprising. Narcissistic autocrats surround themselves with “yes men” to prevent a challenge to their power.
Kenney has open mutiny from both factions. Meaning he hasn’t consolidated his power enough to ward off challenges to his authority. Unlike Trump, he does not command loyalty. Waining support from the base means power is up for grabs.
Aheer and Schweitzer might be challenging Kenney for control of the party.
It’s not that I believe Schweitzer is any better than Kenney. He’s be less sadistic, but he doesn’t have the charisma to lead a UCP divided party. Neither does Aheer. Kenney is aware of that.
It’s not that I believe Schweitzer is any better than Kenney. He’s be less sadistic, but he doesn’t have the charisma to lead a UCP divided party. Neither does Aheer. Kenney is aware of that.
The interesting thing about opportunistic ideological extremists is that loyalty isn’t part of the equation.
The ends justify the means. So stabbing your leader in the back to save the cause isn’t disloyalty. It’s safekeeping power.
The ends justify the means. So stabbing your leader in the back to save the cause isn’t disloyalty. It’s safekeeping power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
