Misinformation spreads rapidly online. In response, Facebook & @Twitter have suggested using ordinary users as fact checkers. But our new #OpenAccess article, in the inaugural issue of @journalsafetech, finds this is likely not a viable solution 1/ tsjournal.org/index.php/jots… Image
Ordinary users -- and machine learning models based on information from those users -- cannot effectively identify false and misleading news in real time, compared to professional fact checkers, according to our experiment. 2/
In the study, each day 90 Americans and six professional fact checkers (PFCs) evaluated the veracity of a sample of news articles. We collected 12,883 evaluations across 135 articles. 3/
Using this data, we evaluated how well PFCs accurately assessed the veracity of articles -- and compared the results to ordinary users, users with high political knowledge, and machine-learning models based on input from each type of user. 4/
Although machine learning based models perform significantly better than simply aggregating the evaluations of groups of ordinary users, the study found, neither approach is able to perform at the level of PFCs. 5/
In addition, both models perform best when only using the evaluations from those with high political knowledge, suggesting reason for caution for crowdsourcing models that seek to rely on a representative sample of the population See results for simple rules, e.g. 6/ Image
The idea of using ordinary users as fact checkers is appealing. It takes decisions out of the hands of the big, powerful platforms; it is scalable; and it can be more inclusive and representative. Unfortunately, it wasn’t effective in our experiment. 7/
As part of a larger toolkit, real time crowdsourced fact checking may offer a viable tool to combat the spread of online misinformation. Nonetheless we find little evidence that a crowd-based approach, on its own, is sufficient to identify false news. 8/
Congrats to our entire team (@WilliamGodel @zns202 @aslett_kevin @Jonathan_Nagler @RichBonneauNYU @persily @j_a_tucker) for this important research. 9/
Read a summary of our study here 10/10

csmapnyu.org/2021/10/28/new…
To further examine our data, see our open-sourced dataset on Github: github.com/SMAPPNYU/crowd…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with NYU's Center for Social Media and Politics

NYU's Center for Social Media and Politics Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CSMaP_NYU

6 Oct
A lot to unpack from today’s Facebook whistleblower Senate hearing. Here’s some interesting storylines and insightful commentary we’ve seen: 🧵 1/
Many have noted this was one of the most focused and productive Big Tech hearing they've seen. Perhaps lawmakers are ready to cross the aisle and work together on meaningful regulation?
Maybe. @Cat_Zakrzewski @viaCristiano @lizzadwoskin @WillOremus note that lawmakers are outraged, but "there's little consensus on what kind of legislation they might advance."

washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
Read 10 tweets
5 Oct
Platforms have troves of research studying their societal impact. The recent FB revelations, and today's whistleblower hearing, show why it's critical for govt to open that data to outside researchers, @j_a_tucker & @Jonathan_Nagler write in @NYDailyNews

nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-ope…
At @CSMaP_NYU, data is the foundation of everything we study. Often, the data will tell us something different than the anecdotal evidence circulating in the media and online.
For example, in 2016, stories claimed fake news was a widespread problem. In fact, our study found less than 9% of Americans shared links to fake news sites on FB, and this was disproportionately common among people over 65.

smappnyu.wpcomstaging.com/wp-content/upl…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(