I like Congressman Kinzinger and I'm on his side, but I'm baffled by the soundtrack. I'm not carping about something trivial here. The soundtrack is an aspect of a certain flattened emotional sensibility that's part of the larger problem:
It involves the loss of a sense of what's emotionally appropriate. It involves the rendering of what should be the most serious of oratory into an emotionally homogeneous goo. The soundtrack is perhaps suitable for selling something plant-based.
It has no business as the soundtrack to a serious speech, and indeed a serious speech should not have a soundtrack, and if this isn't a serious speech, what is it?
How can we take the message--that there's a grave threat to American democracy--as seriously as he asks us to take it if we've got the "Introducing Twee, a Plant-Based Edible Product" soundtrack running in the background?
It's the sound of shopping while your soul is anesthetized, and it had better be anesthetized or that music would drive you berserk. It's deadening. But without access to the full register of human emotions, why would you care what happens to American democracy?
It suggests democracy is a commercial product just like any other--albeit a low-rent processed food, not Ossetra caviar--and you can safely ignore it.
When you've stripped away all the emotional tones in the palette like this, what's left?
A profound mood of boredom waiting to be relieved by the entertainment of a shouting buffoon.
Sorry, @RepKinzinger, I don't mean to pick on you, you're hardly alone in this. But I notice this strange, flattened affect across the board in American culture now--
--and I think it's *meaningful.* Figuring this out is important to solve the problems you're concerned about. (I am, too.) The only authentic emotion we seem to be comfortable displaying is rage.
Everything else is sentimentalism, kitsch, and some gooey emulsified product made with Natural Emotional Flavor.
A severe threat to the American experiment should evoke *passionate* emotions. And you're damned right about the threat. So this spot shouldn't be numbingly boring. But it is.
My advice: Ditch the soundtrack and re-record. Aim for Henry V at Agincourt. If that idea makes you laugh--why?
Isn't American democracy worth real oratory?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's the details that are so exquisite. "Polly Rodriguez, 34, chief executive of the sexual wellness business Unbound" ..."Mr. Kennedy, co-founder of the herbal supplement brand Plant People ... " "Elaine Purcell, 34 founder of the maternity care start-up Oula" ...
"Emily Fletcher, 42, who runs Ziva Meditation," "Lola Priego, 31, chief executive of the lab-testing start-up Base" (that one's my favorite, tbh) ... and "Ali Kriegsman, 30," who isn't sure how she feels about her employees skipping work because they've got menstrual cramps--
"I want to call out of managing my team sometimes because my period is making me super hormonal,” she concedes.
My brother tells me he no longer knows what's going on in my life because I'm never on Twitter anymore. Which is true. For reasons I don't understand, I just got bored with Twitter.
It isn't owed to some scheme for self-improvement: I didn't make some big decision that Twitter was a waste of time and life or anything. I just got bored.
However, I've been getting a number of emails from people who, I guess, are starting to worry.
Especially since they've also received no newsletter recently. But don't worry. There is no cause. We're working hard to debut the new @cosmo_globalist website. All is well.
I really see no reason--nothing to be gained, and no excuse--for having insulted France so profoundly. They were entitled to a warning, and entitled to hear it from AUS and US, rather than finding out in Politico.
In international relations as in love, if you're going to dump someone, you should do them the courtesy of telling them to their face. Letting them hear it on the grapevine is just needlessly humiliating.
Bonjour @forumrefugies, je me demande si vous pouviez me renseigner. Je suis extrêmement inquiète pour une famille de huit personnes, dont cinq filles, en Afghanistan. Ils sont en danger grave car le père travaillait pour une ONG française;
et la mère et la fille étaient toutes deux des avocats qui travaillaient pour les droits des femmes. Ils sont maintenant cachés et désespérés. J'essaie de trouver un moyen de les aider à retrouver leur liberté et leur sécurité.
Existe-t-il un programme, en France, qui me permettrait de parrainer cette famille ? S'ils peuvent obtenir un visa pour venir en France, il y a une chance qu'ils puissent partir sur un vol commercial si les compagnies aériennes recommencent à fonctionner.
"The decision is contrary to the letter and the spirit of cooperation that had prevailed between France and Australia, based on a relationship of political trust as well as Australia's development of a very high level industrial and technological defense base."
"The American choice, which leads to the removal of an ally and a European partner like France from a structuring partnership with Australia, at a time when we are facing unprecedented challenges in the Indo-Pacific region--
--both in terms of our values and in regard to respect for multilateralism based on the rule of law--marks an absence of coherence that France can only observe and regret."
1/ I'm extremely concerned about a particular family of eight--including five daughters--in Afghanistan. They're at exceptionally high risk because the father worked for a French NGO and both mother and daughter were women's rights activists.
2/ They're now in hiding and desperate. I'm trying to figure out a realistic way to help them get to freedom and safety. I'd be extremely grateful for any advice anyone can give me about pathways to get them a) visas to a safe country; and b) safe passage to that country.
@is_OwenLewis, Canada has a program that allows people privately to sponsor refugees. If @cosmo_globalist were able to raise money to support them, might someone in your community be willing to sponsor them?