1 year ago @jeremycorbyn was unjustly suspended by the LP for a measured, honest response to the EHRC Report. Starmer and the msm put the perverse spin on it that Corbyn had said that "antisemitism was exaggerated". He said nothing of the sort. 1/7
He said: "Anyone claiming there is no antisemitism in the LP is wrong... and sometimes it is voiced by people who think of themselves as on the left." But he rightly exonerated the vast bulk of LP members from the disgusting stain of being unjustly accused of antisemitism. 2/7
Corbyn said that "the scale of the problem" was "dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media." Many Jewish LP members and constituents agree, and wrote to newspapers+on social media to say so. 3/7
Corbyn called for the Report’s recommendations to be implemented re processes, but did not accept all of its findings. He's not the only one. The report relies on an elastic+unconvincing concept of "harassment" and imprecise comments on party "culture" unbacked by evidence. 4/7
Starmer called the report "a day of shame" but made no comment when a few days later a Joint Parl Ctte slammed the EHRC for internal+external failures re racial equality. No comment either when women condemned an EHRC "whitewash" of gender pay discrimination at the BBC. 5/7
Neither did Starmer commen on a set of very dubious EHRC appointments condemned by anti-racists. All these events were within days/weeks of the "damning" EHRC Report on Labour+Antisemitism. This silence is damning. Why should proponents of equality have any faith in the EHRC? 6/7
An NEC panel rightly overturned Corbyn's suspension but Starmer then removed the LP whip from him. This was an act of weakness, not strength. Nearly 35,000 constituents voted for Corbyn to continue being their Labour MP in 2019. It's time to listen to them. #RestoreTheWhip 7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rosenberg

David Rosenberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidjrosenberg

29 May
In recent years @jeremycorbyn was one of shamefully few politicians warning of the menacing growth of far right politics in central+E. Europe. His condemnation of the Johnson-Orban meeting was consistent with that. Stephen Pollard’s deranged response is consistent too. 1/4
It is consistent with his obsessive anti-left politics, his own praise of very right wing Islamophobes (eg Douglas Murray), and with his defence in 2009 of a far right (pro-Israel) antisemite invited to Tory Conference. 2/4
It also expresses his embarrassment that Corbyn voiced the condemnation of the Johnson-Orban meeting that Jewish establishment orgs should have done (it seems that they too can’t bring themselves to condemn pro-Israel antisemites, Islamophobes and anti-Roma racists. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
14 May
Watching with horror the recent wave of pogrom-style thuggery by Far Right Israelis and settlers, I've been recalling the prescient of critiques of Zionism made by Henryk Erlich, prominent leader of the Jewish Workers' Bund in late 1930s Poland. 1/5
In 1938 he said: "The Zionists regard themselves as second-class citizens in Poland. Their aim is to be first-class citizens in Palestine and make the Arabs second-class citizens." That same year he wrote an article entitled "is Zionism a liberating democratic movement?" 2/5
He said: "When the Zionists speak to the non-Jewish world they are tremendous democrats and depict conditions in the Palestine today and of the future as models of freedom and progress. But if a Jewish state should arise in Palestine, 3/5
Read 5 tweets
25 Mar
Very pleased to see the release of the "Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism" this afternoon. It is everything that the IHRA definition is not!
It stems from serious and sustained, work by academics across continents, who have seen the weaknesses of the IHRA in action. 1/6
The have seen how it has been easily used and abused to delegitimise not only views, but also the purveyors of views, which are actually not antisemitic. Whatever the intention of IHRA's original author, it has become a witch-hunter's charter (he has protested against that.) 2/6
The authors of the Jerusalem Declaration are determined to assist people+institutions to respond to real antisemitism in effective and educational ways, while upholding free speech on Israel, Palestine and Zionism, and not allowing Palestinian voices to be stifled. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
5 Mar
The chutzpah of @BoardofDeputies knows no bounds. As willing soldiers in the British establishment's war on Corbyn, they helped to install Boris Johnson, while turning a blind eye not only to Johnson's Islamophobia, anti-black racism, homophobia, his antisemitic novel, 1/2
but also the verifiable links of the Tory Party with other racist and anti-immigrant parties and government across Europe. BoD are continuing their personal vendetta by issuing a joint statement with a Zionist advocacy group in Canada attacking a scheduled event on 20 March. 2/7
Organised by Progressive International, Canada's New Democratic Party MP Niki Ashton and Corbyn will discuss "Building Solidarity" in the context of "growing inequality... rise of the far right... the threat of climate change... the Covid crisis... austerity, privatization". 3/7
Read 8 tweets
4 Mar
If ICC set the beginning of the investigation earlier, the BoD would find another excuse to rubbish it or call it "compromised". The BoD sees its role as defending the interests of Jews in Britain. Why should that mean defending the Israeli government+military from scrutiny? 1/5
Why fear investigation if you think Israel's actions are defensible? You could ask that the investigation start in 2013 but you do know that B'Tselem reported: "Three times as many people were killed in the West Bank in 2013 as were in 2012." Most were Palestinian civilians. 2/5
And who do the BoD think they are speaking for when they try to rubbish this investigation? Every major survey of British Jewish opinion for many years has found a majority of Jews in Britain opposed to the continued occupation, and more are now willing to air that publicly. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
4 Mar
2 years ago today I was fuming as I heard the Blairite Labour MP, Siobhain McDonagh, agree with John Humphreys on Radio 4, that "to be anti-capitalist you have to be antisemitic". She was doing her best to undermine Jeremy Corbyn at the time instead of attacking the Tories. 1/4
How stupid must she feels today, knowing that she helped usher in our most murderous Tory Government ever, which is now trying to salvage itself by borrowing some economic policies from Corbyn's 2017 manifesto! Starmer, meanwhile, opposes Tory plans to raise Corporation Tax. 2/4
Here are some beautiful Yiddish anti-capitalist words by Sh. Ansky in 1902 to honour the Jewish Workers' Bund: "Mir shvern tsu himl a blutiker has.
tsum merder un royber fun arbeter klas,
der keyser, di hersher, di kapitalistn,
mir shvern zey alemen farnikhtn, farvistn" 3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(